Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Personal Wedding Photography, Oct 29, 2007 - non wedding material

views
     
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 16 2007, 09:45 AM, updated 19y ago

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Preview
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Oct 29 2007, 12:17 PM
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 16 2007, 10:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

That's all for today, not sure if I wanna post anymore of them up without the couple's consent

A little about today's shoot.

first of all, what a lovely couple, they are seriously in love, and had all the blessings they could get for their wedding. I'm really happy for them. As for the day, rain was coming on and off from 12-1pm, we got most of the important shots done by 2pm though, so we didn't really miss much. It was raining for the rest of the day. I was pretty excited about the shoot but as soon as I got indoor, some stuff started to piss me off.

I sold my sb600 a few days ago, and now left with my vivitar 285hv. The flash doesn't rotate and I didn't put my flash bracket on, so I could only bounce the flash at fixed direction...which was horrible as not all the time there's stuff to bounce on. Next, the flash took ages to recycle to full, which SERIOUSLY pissed me off. Another thing is when I'm indoor, the 80-200 didn't cut it, wasn't reliable enough at extreme low light, not even at 2.8. Both the flash and lens caused me to miss many shots.

I can't wait to receive my sb80dx, the vivitar doesnt cut it as main flash for wedding photography. I'm contemplating selling my 17-50mm and get the 85mm 1.4 now, a small diversion from my upgrade path but what the heck..that'd leave me with 85mm 1.4 + 50mm 1.8 + 80-200mm 2.8 <- which I think will be used exclusively at outdoor and medium indoor lighting. If the flash doesnt cut it, I really gonna smack my head on the wall sweat.gif

btw, everything shot at f2.8-f4 with manual exposure, you obviously can see that from the exif.

This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 16 2007, 10:49 AM
orenzai
post Sep 16 2007, 11:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


wowow....nice le bro..but i was wondering...since you say very low lighting why you use 1/250? just asking smile.gif
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 16 2007, 11:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Shutter speed doesn't make a difference in flash lighting, it only affects the ambient to flash fill ratio/% and shooting at 1/250 ensures that there's no camera shake/motion blur coz I'm using an 80-200mm lens.

I always set it a little higher than my lens' maximum focal length so I don't have to worry about the shutter speed smile.gif Technically, I can even get away with it at lower shutter speed since the flash will freeze the motion, but it's just one of those practice I try to adhere to.
orenzai
post Sep 16 2007, 12:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


ah..okok..thanks for explaining...hehe...
yewkhuay
post Sep 16 2007, 02:22 PM

I don't even belong here....
*******
Senior Member
6,657 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
nice shots bro....!!!!! i m on my way learning to shoot for indoor event...hopefully this yr end can give some good shots for my fren's wedding!!

so u use the 80-200 more or the 50mm ???
Maniac
post Sep 16 2007, 02:56 PM

That Tech Guy Who Use Nikon For Video
Group Icon
VIP
5,938 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Now In The City of Merlion



80-200 indoor, u must be kidding biggrin.gif

for nikon aps-c indoor, DX 17-55 is the one to die for, forget bout 85/1.4. its not so versatile for indoor, event covering kind of shooting (wedding is one of them)
undazztood
post Sep 16 2007, 02:59 PM

true goodness is understood
*****
Senior Member
991 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Always Somewhere
8hours wedding photo shots. u must be very2 tired after that. i like the 1st one.
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 16 2007, 04:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
one of the other photog dude I took from the mirror, there's a bit of a reflection of me in it laugh.gif

One thing I tend to always look out for is keeping horizontal/vertical planes straight. The other guy told me he usually just shoot loosely, then go back photoshop and rotate it doh.gif I'm very used to keeping the lines straight, always do it unconsciously.

That's all I'm gonna post up from this gig, have another one next week. Gonna try to bring 2 flash next time. Finally, man this laptop monitor sux to the max....wtf? 4bit color kar...pictures look great on my 8bit benq fp241, quality drops 70% when I view the pix over here shakehead.gif

This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 16 2007, 06:35 PM
kelvinyam
post Sep 16 2007, 08:19 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


Beautiful. You caught quite a number of "the right moments".
Mavik
post Sep 16 2007, 08:31 PM

Patience is a virtue
Group Icon
Elite
7,826 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Nice, you managed to capture the moments of the wedding smile.gif

Its a pity the 2nd last shot had a little bit of the guy's head chopped off.
travis_ckf
post Sep 16 2007, 09:54 PM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


Hmm i expected to see more lovely shots of the wedding couple. More to fun perhaps? tongue.gif
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 16 2007, 11:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


yup, these dudes are more of the happy go lucky ones, and the other photog was making them laugh all the time, which is good...you need to talk to them a lot to get them to relax and poses naturally. I was totally out-spoken..can you imagine how much that guy talk? sweat.gif

thanks for all of the comments, for some reasons I thought I posted all the pictures I uploaded to flickr but some didn't show...odd. anyway here are the remaining few:


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
CompMac
post Sep 17 2007, 05:19 AM

世界見てください
******
Senior Member
1,573 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Slave in Seremban...


Some comments from me. Sorry if they are not that good as I'm still not thinking well after a flight back from Vienna.

I think a telephoto lens doesn't suit a wedding very well. A wide to medium telephoto zoom lens like what maniac said should be a better choice for capture the moment pictures. A telephoto lens would be great for posed pictures.

While the moments captured are good but composition and WB can be better. There are some warm pictures posted.

I'm sure you will be shooting great pictures with the right gear, especially with a proper external flash.

Thanks for sharing.
turbovtec
post Sep 17 2007, 08:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
very nice. the colour look very natural.. using a telephoto such as 80-200 F2.8 at a speed of 1/250 is good for candid.. but i think if the subject dont move so much. you could slower the speed. the catch the ambient light in extreme low light condition... hmm. had you try to push the iso .. 1000-1600 maybe.is it too high for nikon? than convert the picture to bnw with noise , hehehe.. just my opinion.. smile.gif
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 17 2007, 08:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


It's difficult coz the speed has to do with camera shake sweat.gif I would be able to get a better blend of ambient + flash if I was using 70-200mm vr with vr enabled, but unfortunately, need to shoot at relatively high shutter speed on this lens. I'll try to find out what's the min shutter speed I can handle with this lens + flash.

Yeah, iso1600 is too high for this camera biggrin.gif but it was alright on my older D50. You are right, I did shoot some high iso pictures intended to be converted to B&W and keep the noise as film grain, but somehow i just cannot take it sweat.gif I think I'll shoot at iso800 top for this camera.

I don't know why I was so fixated in taking full body shot of the last few pictures, should have zoomed in closer and get waist up shots, I've gotta try to keep that in mind for this coming sat's gig.
wtm0325
post Sep 17 2007, 10:26 PM


******
Senior Member
1,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2005

very nice alamaklor, u had capture the very nice moment of the wedding

as a newbie here i doesnt technical thing on how to take photos, but wat i can feel is the couple is really lovely

u had sent the msg to the reader smile.gif
zadan
post Sep 17 2007, 10:52 PM

= BF 2 FeVa =
Group Icon
Elite
2,332 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: *KL-ian*

nice work man! yeah shooting weddings you got to deal with low light environment every time. i don't actually agree that tele lense is not suitable for wedding. for me telelense is one of the must have lense for weddings, for indoor and outdoor shoot. the lense will be very useful and will make capture beautiful candids and potraits. a super wide angle is one of the must have too for weddings. i would say you will need:

+ wide angle
+ tele
+ 50mm
+powderful flash laugh.gif
Mavik
post Sep 17 2007, 11:27 PM

Patience is a virtue
Group Icon
Elite
7,826 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



I see a lot of photographers not use the 50mm but stick to the 85mm f1.4. But I guess it is a matter of preference right? smile.gif
TSAlamakLor
post Sep 18 2007, 06:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Yeah, a wide/superwide is quite important for a HUGE group shot biggrin.gif I sold my 50mm when I sold my d50, but I just repurchased that lens and is on the way to me. Hopefully I can get it by end of the month. I'm also getting my ac adapter for my flash some time this week, which helps to recycle the flash to full in < 2s. I'll try to see if it is viable to setup a stationary flash at a strategic location during next wedding ceremony to help reduce my on-camera flash power usage until my sb80dx arrives.

I'll also try to use my 150mm prime for next session, it doesn't hunt as much as my 80-200 after setting the limit switch. Gonna just toss all the stuff in my waist pouch.

I think the 50mm vs 85mm is just a preference. Some people like to be closer to the subjects, some like to be farther away. But as far as bokeh is concerned, the 85mm 1.4 is one of the best.

Oh btw, I will have wedding gigs every saturday, maybe on sundays too rclxms.gif so prepare for lovely couple pictures. I plan to shoot strictly b&w for next wedding preparation.

This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 18 2007, 06:15 AM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0194sec    0.30    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 04:34 AM