




This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Oct 29 2007, 12:17 PM
Personal Wedding Photography, Oct 29, 2007 - non wedding material
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 09:45 AM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
Preview
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Oct 29 2007, 12:17 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 10:24 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() That's all for today, not sure if I wanna post anymore of them up without the couple's consent A little about today's shoot. first of all, what a lovely couple, they are seriously in love, and had all the blessings they could get for their wedding. I'm really happy for them. As for the day, rain was coming on and off from 12-1pm, we got most of the important shots done by 2pm though, so we didn't really miss much. It was raining for the rest of the day. I was pretty excited about the shoot but as soon as I got indoor, some stuff started to piss me off. I sold my sb600 a few days ago, and now left with my vivitar 285hv. The flash doesn't rotate and I didn't put my flash bracket on, so I could only bounce the flash at fixed direction...which was horrible as not all the time there's stuff to bounce on. Next, the flash took ages to recycle to full, which SERIOUSLY pissed me off. Another thing is when I'm indoor, the 80-200 didn't cut it, wasn't reliable enough at extreme low light, not even at 2.8. Both the flash and lens caused me to miss many shots. I can't wait to receive my sb80dx, the vivitar doesnt cut it as main flash for wedding photography. I'm contemplating selling my 17-50mm and get the 85mm 1.4 now, a small diversion from my upgrade path but what the heck..that'd leave me with 85mm 1.4 + 50mm 1.8 + 80-200mm 2.8 <- which I think will be used exclusively at outdoor and medium indoor lighting. If the flash doesnt cut it, I really gonna smack my head on the wall btw, everything shot at f2.8-f4 with manual exposure, you obviously can see that from the exif. This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 16 2007, 10:49 AM |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 11:14 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
wowow....nice le bro..but i was wondering...since you say very low lighting why you use 1/250? just asking
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 11:17 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
Shutter speed doesn't make a difference in flash lighting, it only affects the ambient to flash fill ratio/% and shooting at 1/250 ensures that there's no camera shake/motion blur coz I'm using an 80-200mm lens.
I always set it a little higher than my lens' maximum focal length so I don't have to worry about the shutter speed |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 12:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
ah..okok..thanks for explaining...hehe...
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 02:22 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,657 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
nice shots bro....!!!!! i m on my way learning to shoot for indoor event...hopefully this yr end can give some good shots for my fren's wedding!!
so u use the 80-200 more or the 50mm ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 02:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
5,938 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Now In The City of Merlion |
80-200 indoor, u must be kidding
for nikon aps-c indoor, DX 17-55 is the one to die for, forget bout 85/1.4. its not so versatile for indoor, event covering kind of shooting (wedding is one of them) |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 02:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
991 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Always Somewhere |
8hours wedding photo shots. u must be very2 tired after that. i like the 1st one.
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 04:40 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() one of the other photog dude I took from the mirror, there's a bit of a reflection of me in it One thing I tend to always look out for is keeping horizontal/vertical planes straight. The other guy told me he usually just shoot loosely, then go back photoshop and rotate it That's all I'm gonna post up from this gig, have another one next week. Gonna try to bring 2 flash next time. Finally, man this laptop monitor sux to the max....wtf? 4bit color kar...pictures look great on my 8bit benq fp241, quality drops 70% when I view the pix over here This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 16 2007, 06:35 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 08:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
Beautiful. You caught quite a number of "the right moments".
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 08:31 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Nice, you managed to capture the moments of the wedding
Its a pity the 2nd last shot had a little bit of the guy's head chopped off. |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 09:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One.... |
Hmm i expected to see more lovely shots of the wedding couple. More to fun perhaps?
|
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 11:59 PM
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
yup, these dudes are more of the happy go lucky ones, and the other photog was making them laugh all the time, which is good...you need to talk to them a lot to get them to relax and poses naturally. I was totally out-spoken..can you imagine how much that guy talk?
thanks for all of the comments, for some reasons I thought I posted all the pictures I uploaded to flickr but some didn't show...odd. anyway here are the remaining few: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 05:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
Some comments from me. Sorry if they are not that good as I'm still not thinking well after a flight back from Vienna.
I think a telephoto lens doesn't suit a wedding very well. A wide to medium telephoto zoom lens like what maniac said should be a better choice for capture the moment pictures. A telephoto lens would be great for posed pictures. While the moments captured are good but composition and WB can be better. There are some warm pictures posted. I'm sure you will be shooting great pictures with the right gear, especially with a proper external flash. Thanks for sharing. |
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 08:07 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
very nice. the colour look very natural.. using a telephoto such as 80-200 F2.8 at a speed of 1/250 is good for candid.. but i think if the subject dont move so much. you could slower the speed. the catch the ambient light in extreme low light condition... hmm. had you try to push the iso .. 1000-1600 maybe.is it too high for nikon? than convert the picture to bnw with noise , hehehe.. just my opinion..
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 08:09 PM
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
It's difficult coz the speed has to do with camera shake
Yeah, iso1600 is too high for this camera I don't know why I was so fixated in taking full body shot of the last few pictures, should have zoomed in closer and get waist up shots, I've gotta try to keep that in mind for this coming sat's gig. |
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 10:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,796 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
very nice alamaklor, u had capture the very nice moment of the wedding
as a newbie here i doesnt technical thing on how to take photos, but wat i can feel is the couple is really lovely u had sent the msg to the reader |
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 10:52 PM
|
|
Elite
2,332 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: *KL-ian* |
nice work man! yeah shooting weddings you got to deal with low light environment every time. i don't actually agree that tele lense is not suitable for wedding. for me telelense is one of the must have lense for weddings, for indoor and outdoor shoot. the lense will be very useful and will make capture beautiful candids and potraits. a super wide angle is one of the must have too for weddings. i would say you will need:
+ wide angle + tele + 50mm +powderful flash |
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 11:27 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
I see a lot of photographers not use the 50mm but stick to the 85mm f1.4. But I guess it is a matter of preference right?
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 06:13 AM
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
Yeah, a wide/superwide is quite important for a HUGE group shot
I'll also try to use my 150mm prime for next session, it doesn't hunt as much as my 80-200 after setting the limit switch. Gonna just toss all the stuff in my waist pouch. I think the 50mm vs 85mm is just a preference. Some people like to be closer to the subjects, some like to be farther away. But as far as bokeh is concerned, the 85mm 1.4 is one of the best. Oh btw, I will have wedding gigs every saturday, maybe on sundays too This post has been edited by AlamakLor: Sep 18 2007, 06:15 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0194sec
0.30
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 04:34 AM |