not sure why this is so controversial (but its project Veritas so I guess they want to sensationalize news like this just like CNN for their narratives). Sinopharm had 2-7% of patients who did not seroconvert at all. Based on epidemiological data from Sri Lanka. Not everyone seroconverts for vaccines.
The controversial part is the snake said no need to test to see if you seroconvert or not?
The important thing to the snake is not u immune or not? The important thing to the snake is u cucuk.
Well the context of "his i wont take pfizer" matters. That time pfizrr was scarce and he was trying to reassure ppl who would get sinovac in lieu of pfizer . Since everyone is now offered pfizer there is nothing hypocritical abt his statement when taking into acct the original context. But im sure u knew taht alraedy and are just finding fault because of ur vendetta .
It's hard to understand how we can trust the safety data provided by Pfizer [1]; we can see that the official package insert approved by the FDA for Comirnaty [2] states that acute allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis) have been reported only in post-marketing surveillance (including EUA); while in the real world [3] the observed rate of acute allergic reactions is close to 2% (1.95% [95% CI, 1.79%-2.13%] ) and the observed rate of anaphylaxis is close to 1/3700 for mRNA Covid-19 vaccines (Pfizer 0.027% [95% CI, 0.011%-0.056%]). It's impossible to miss that in a cohort of 21,700 vaccinated individuals in a clinical trial.
This observational study has been published online in March 2021, it was clear that we could question the authenticity of the safety data published by Pfizer early in the roll-out of this vaccine.
This is why the UK Vaccination Committee said the benefits for children are marginal and don't recommend vaccinating children because they don't know what's the long term side effects.
Oct 17 2021, 02:21 PM
Quote
0.0206sec
0.29
6 queries
GZIP Disabled