Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FI/RE - Financial Independence / Retire Early

views
     
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 11 2023, 02:37 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ronnie @ Aug 11 2023, 02:16 PM)
With >RM2m in EPF, and utilise the EPF dividend annually, would it be consider FI/RE ?
If yes, which F.I.R.E. category will it fall under ?
*
If you use the 4% rule, you will have around RM80k per year to spend without running out of funds.

So you decide if that's enough.
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 11 2023, 03:37 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(batman1172 @ Aug 11 2023, 03:27 PM)
the 4% rule is not applicable if refering to pulling out dividends from EPF. it won't last forever due to inflation. its more to US stock/bond portfolio which pay 10%. EPF 6% also cannot.
*
4% is not referring to dividends, it's more like a rule to slowly drawdown your savings at a sustainable rate.

The 80k has taken into account that he has 2mil, around 20-25yrs to spend, return of 5% and inflation of 3% annually.

So if he just wants to know can he retire with RM2mil, answer is yes if he is okay with spending roughly that 80k or so a year.

EPF returns generally has kept up with inflation and as the money compounds so does your runway, the one that hasn't kept up is more like people's salary.
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 15 2023, 12:58 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(hksgmy @ Aug 15 2023, 10:17 AM)
I’m my opinion that’s so very true. I carried on working even after I achieved (lean) FIRE some 10 years ago and saw how that actually helped boost up the reserves exponentially to fat FIRE now and I’m still working part time to make sure I don’t feel a loss of sense of self worth and purpose.
*
Yep, people always think FIRE is retire and do nothing, but forgot the FI part of it.

I absolutely enjoy what I do, even with the shit days. I get paid well, I get challenges to solve, I have intellectual discussions with smart people.

Fully knowing I can walk away from it without a care should I choose to. That's the FI part.
SUSfuzzy
post Nov 8 2023, 05:53 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(batman1172 @ Nov 8 2023, 03:04 PM)
For those that aim to retire. RM240,000 cannot already. need 3.9m according to study below. That's about USD1m said many times in this forum.

HSBC survey shows Malaysia’s mass affluent aim to stop working by age 57, need RM3.9 mil for comfortable retirement

https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/689008
*
QUOTE
In the HSBC Quality of Life report released yesterday, the “mass affluent” were defined as individuals with between US$100,000 and US$2 million (RM460,000 and RM9.3 million) of investable wealth.


They asked mass affluent segment, those that is on median CURRENTLY carrying a net worth of MYR4-5mil.

Which is why they say they want at least MYR4mil to retire comfortably, because they already living this kind of lifestyle now.


SUSfuzzy
post Nov 8 2023, 08:12 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Wedchar2912 @ Nov 8 2023, 08:04 PM)
their definition of mass affluent is targeted towards developed country's "mass" "affluent". Not our country's affluent segment...

our affluent group is actually quite poor, especially the bottom affluent group.  nod.gif
*
Cannot be, according to all here retirement fund must be USD1-2mil wor, else how to survive 😂
SUSfuzzy
post Feb 26 2024, 09:58 AM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(icemanfx @ Feb 25 2024, 02:27 PM)
some /k and .... lack sense of humour.
*
stay out of there man... sweat.gif
SUSfuzzy
post Dec 5 2024, 01:53 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Wedchar2912 @ Dec 5 2024, 01:06 PM)
you seemed to like to ask these type questions almost on a monthly basis...

the answer will remain the same, cos your question is basic. can retire with 4 million? can. end of story.

next question? if wish for better help, need better refined questions with specific details.
*
He's a troll from k/ la.
SUSfuzzy
post Apr 6 2025, 05:40 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(jutamind @ Apr 5 2025, 08:05 PM)
Just came across this article this morning on the amount required for retirement. T20 retirement sum for 25 years required 7m

Sos
*
Stupid article from a purported "financial guru".

Firstly, uses household income to spin it as average income. Household income here is combined income of 3.8 person. As such, average monthly in per person is only around 5k, not 19k.

Secondly, this is gross income, not nett. You take away 11% for EPF, 20+% for tax your take home is around RM4.4k. On top of that, this goes to service your house, car, child education, commute to work or whatever. In general, people still have at least 10-20% left for savings and investment, so your actual spend is only around 4k to round it up.

Post retirement, taking away the house, education and general commute, I'll be generous and say your spending is around 3k per month, not 15k a month.

Secondly, they use a very misleading manner to say "savings" required and compound it at 2%. So he's ignoring EPF's return or ASB, or gold, or FD, or stock market which all compound higher than 2%?

Somehow you can be T20 in salary but doesn't understand investments that beat 2%?

Lastly, maybe it's a typo but if you start work at 25 with 5k and retire at 65 with 5k, your EPF is RM1.9mil, not RM1.04mil (plus retirement age is 60 so maybe he knows something we don't).

So please be reminded that anyone can call themselves financial guru but you have to think critically about what they are trying to sell you.
SUSfuzzy
post Apr 23 2025, 01:26 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Why is everyone here talking as if they are already late 50's - 60's?
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 19 2025, 02:15 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I've been lucky to have been asked to go garden leave a couple of times before I moved to a new organisation.

I can't even do a month of that, so RE is an alien concept to me. FI is what I'm chasing, as what the famous saying goes, get your f- you money.

Then we can decide what we want to do with our time.
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 19 2025, 03:21 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Ramjade @ Aug 19 2025, 03:14 PM)
You will find walking in jungle is quite relaxing and nice. Yes mosquitoes are a nuisance.
*
cannot weh, i tried the camping all. Just not my thing. I bought pc / game console, not my thing.

I think need more time to structure what if I have additional 8hours a day to do what i like sweat.gif
SUSfuzzy
post Aug 20 2025, 01:58 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(pillage2001 @ Aug 20 2025, 01:37 PM)
What on earth you guys doing that need 22k a month today.......Assuming all paid up.
*
People suck at budgeting tongue.gif

They think they gonna baller every day.
SUSfuzzy
post Sep 23 2025, 11:53 AM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(guy3288 @ Sep 23 2025, 10:33 AM)
Engineering is under professional, white collar better

Vocational no need university, polytechnic diploma can do
But hands on can be physically taxing...less prestige..

Is Singapore offering higher than 4000 for new Eng grads from Malaysia?
No discrimination?
*
Median pay for fresh engineering grads from the top unis in SG is around 4k. Their MOE publishes the data - but its skewed because those that has shit pay or no job wouldn't fill in these kind of survey gua.

Secondly, roughly 50% of the graduates each year can't find a job.

QUOTE
As at June 2025, 9,300 fresh resident graduates were employed, for an employment rate of 51.9 per cent – up from 8,600 graduates and an employment rate of 47.9 per cent for the previous cohort.


Things are tough out there.
SUSfuzzy
post Sep 23 2025, 12:46 PM

*pew pew pew*
*******
Senior Member
7,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Wedchar2912 @ Sep 23 2025, 12:41 PM)

It’s kind of funny. Everyone talks about wanting innovation and opportunities for the youth, but the system is literally designed to keep the old guard parked in their chairs. And guess what, the older crowd is usually the most resistant to change. Since govs are supposed to represent the people, I guess that means people and businesses like it this way? Lol.

*
Won't want to steer to much into politics else get red card again lol.

But, government represent the majority voters. And those who votes tend to be older crowd. So everything is skewed to them - if they can't work and make money - they can't have a good living - they vote opposition. So, prolong the retirement age - give them more subsidies.

The young ones? Claim they lazy, not hardworking, not gritty, not government's fault.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0748sec    0.09    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:49 PM