QUOTE(rx330 @ May 19 2026, 03:24 PM)
Frankly never crossed my mind, im self employed, but there is the fear if I decided I dont want to carry on the business.
U bring up a very good point, if I stop everything now, money maybe coming in like 15k a month, tops? May need to sell some assets to cover living costs. Property insurance and all those assessment fee quite a sum yearly and most likely family insurance is a priority, there goes a big chunk as well
Or worst case sell all the assets and turn it into liquid, shud be able to get about 4 to 5m
You need to see if your RM4-5m can survive your drawdown at RM30k/m assuming your RM4-5m is not giving any returns. Remember that inflation will double your RM30k every 24 years at 3%p.a inflation.
QUOTE(jasontoh @ May 19 2026, 03:52 PM)
Yeah, I mean, that's the reason I pump it into EPF instead of relying on options or even dividends which are not so consistent.
I go the opposite route as the market have shown be it is easy to X my returns. Amd, data dog, tesla, crowdstrike, lseg have shown me it is easy to few X my reruns. The X returns is superior to what EPF can offer me. Not to mentioned that majority of what I hold have dividends growing at double digit every year and income from options.
QUOTE(MGM @ May 19 2026, 04:10 PM)
Let say u r a fresh STEM graduate with savings of 1 mil, with no investing knowledge but decided to embark into investing life without working a regular JOB (see no job security due to AI) how would u do it to get FIRE.
What about start working at an option training SCHOOL to learn?
100 shares in QQQ that cannot touch.
100 shares in QQQ and just keep selling options on them.
That is it.
Extra money to buy whatever you want.
QUOTE(OPT @ May 19 2026, 04:20 PM)
Maybe already been put out here in the past…i think it’s good for sharing.
AI summary:
The fundamental message of the chart is exactly what the title states: The more money you save out of your paycheck, the less you need to rely on the stock market to do the heavy lifting for your retirement.
Here is how to read and interpret the curves:
1. The Low Savings Rate Trap (Left Side)
If your savings rate is low (e.g., 5% to 10%), the lines are incredibly steep and spaced far apart.
At a 5% savings rate, if you get a 10% return (red line), you can retire in about 30 years. But if you only get a 4% return (green line), it will take you nearly 80 years to retire.
Takeaway: When you don't save much, you are completely at the mercy of investment returns and market luck to reach financial freedom.
2. The Power of "Brute Force" Saving (Middle to Right)
As you move your savings rate past 40% or 50%, notice how sharply the curves drop and how close together they get.
If you save 60% of your income, it takes you about 12 years to retire if you get a bad return (4%), and about 8 years if you get a great return (10%). The gap between success and failure shrinks to just a few years.
Takeaway: High savings acts as a "brute force" mechanism. It reduces the number of years you need to work drastically because of two simultaneous effects: you are accumulating cash incredibly fast, and you are training yourself to live on a smaller percentage of your income (which means you need a smaller nest egg to retire).
3. The Diminishing Returns of Market Performance
At a 10% savings rate, jumping from a 4% return to an 8% return shaves almost 40 years off your working life.
At an 80% savings rate, jumping from a 4% return to an 8% return shaves off less than a single year.
Takeaway: For aggressive savers, optimization of asset allocation, picking the perfect stocks, or worrying about market crashes matters very little in the early-to-middle stages of wealth accumulation because your savings rate dominates the math.
The chart was created by Nick Maggiulli, the Chief Operating Officer and Data Scientist at Ritholtz Wealth Management, and the author of the popular personal finance blog Of Dollars And Data (as credited at the bottom of the image).
No need for AI 😅