QUOTE(Ramjade @ Sep 27 2025, 01:09 PM)
I will give you my opinion. I have very bad opinions on bonds. I will never hold bonds as they are very inefficient.
They are like FD give you inflation return. So your money is practically not growing in line with inflation. At most maybe +2% ahead of inflation only?
Yes it can protect your value when market turns very red but why would I want to protect my value when I don't care about it and more interested in buying the dip?
That's me. Buying bonds means you getting an IOU from the company. You don't get the growth and dividend growth from the company (should it do well). I will give you an an example. If you invest 10k into Apple shares and Apple bonds 10 years ago, the result today is very different.
Yes bond have a place but never in my portfolio. I got no place bonds in my portfolio. That is why I am unorthodox. Textbook said you must own some bonds. For me why must you follow the text book when more successful people than me have never own bonds?
I see your points... but textbooks and even professionals still argue that bonds have a place in a portfolio. Especially as one gets older. Even the Trinity Study recommends 40 to 50% in bonds. (self confession... i hold zero bonds currently. i used t-bills previously just to optimize my spare cash)They are like FD give you inflation return. So your money is practically not growing in line with inflation. At most maybe +2% ahead of inflation only?
Yes it can protect your value when market turns very red but why would I want to protect my value when I don't care about it and more interested in buying the dip?
That's me. Buying bonds means you getting an IOU from the company. You don't get the growth and dividend growth from the company (should it do well). I will give you an an example. If you invest 10k into Apple shares and Apple bonds 10 years ago, the result today is very different.
Yes bond have a place but never in my portfolio. I got no place bonds in my portfolio. That is why I am unorthodox. Textbook said you must own some bonds. For me why must you follow the text book when more successful people than me have never own bonds?
So I sometimes wonder.I s there a blind spot I’m missing here, one that only becomes obvious with age? For example, when you’re 75, should a bulk of assets really be in bonds for stability?
Or is it simply that bonds are less exciting to discuss compared to stocks, gold, or options?
(Maybe it’s also an age factor — at a younger stage, the need for bonds just isn’t as apparent.)
Sep 27 2025, 01:40 PM

Quote
0.0195sec
0.67
6 queries
GZIP Disabled