Lol, if you would like to compare I don't mind, just don't catch me on a busy day. But it kind of makes me feel like when I was in primary school, like I used to compare with my friends whose lollypop was bigger or who could eat their ice cream faster and not get brain freeze.
Did I say you didn't care about your animals? I said you take initiative to do all this, but the main keys of a miller is that you breed in mass and do not check the genetics, you don't back track 3 generations beforehand before you breed them and such. Like I said, you take initiative to do all this but you do not do it selectively, you breed for quantity right? Do you or do you not? Do you look into their genes? Know what genes each hamster carries so you can carry out to find a suitable gene to compliment it? A normal golden syrian may carry many genes, they may carry the BEC gene, the cinnamon gene, the black gene, basically any of the recessive genes. If you do not take all this into consideration, then you're considered a miller.
It's like businessmen, there are good businessmen that do their jobs well, earn a steady pay and honest living, but there are some that cheat ppl for a living, have terrible patience and such just that they cheat ppl professionally without tarnishing their reputation, but they both are still considered businessmen, no? Ugly model, stunningly beautiful model, model that can't talk properly, still a model, no?
Like explained before, a miller is basically a person that breeds a specific or multiple types of animals in mass production. There are many categories of millers, but the basic explanation for it is that. If I had 100+ hamsters, 200+ breeding gliders, 300+ rats and mice and I don't research on their genetics, all I do is feed them and breed them for the quantity and sell them, then I am considered a miller. But I do not, like Crazymouse said, you think in business terms but you take into consideration about the diet, but when you agreed on the 'feed according to your budget' thing for the gliders, I disagreed, that's all. I do not think in business terms, I am a hobbyist that breeds under a certain standard for quality, that is that.
What is a (Name of animal) miller? A mass breeder of (Name of animal).
What are these mass breeders usually called? (Name of animal) Miller.
It's the same thing, just that 'mass breeder' has not been used very often to describe millers, so it doesn't sound so bad.
I do know that you willingly accept animals given to you free or cheap and you breed them to sell. In breeder/Pet ownership Ethics, that is not a good thing to do. That already marks the level of your quality. A breeder that controls their line and genetics will not simply accept hamsters from just anyone to breed.
In a way, I don't think it's fair to compare though, my line consists of imported blood, so they look different from the local syrians. I don't have any robos to compare to yours, I only have some syrians that I kept after my breeding project. Unless you want to compare the health, that would mean going to the vet, checking the internal organs like the liver, kidneys, lungs, the blood, the level of white blood cells and red blood cells, the nasal passage, the intestines etc. I would rather spend that money elsewhere like on buying better food, hay and bedding for my animals.
It all boils down to
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Puppy/Glider/Kitten'Hamster Mill = Very large quantities of animals kept in a limited area = Less care given due to the large quantity, level of care spreads out thinner to each animal = Not so good health/Not so good genetics/Not so good temperament.
Like I said, unless you do nothing but spend time everyday with your breeding animals like a person that has 200 breeding pairs of gliders, you will have barely enough time to eat, sleep, bathe, work etc. It can't be helped that the level of care deteriorates due to the large number, so as a result the animals will deteriorate in some way, be it quality, health etc. Unless you hire a full-time worker just to care for your animals or something.
I am not trying to brand you or make you look bad.
If I really wanted to brand you as the so called taboo word HAMSTER MILLER, I would have said something like, 'This Mako guy only breeds for the numbers and sells them at a cheap price to attract ppl to buy in quantity, feeds them cheap grains bought from some pet shop. Don't buy from him, his hamsters sure unhealthy and die faster.' This is
IF I really don't have brains and simply bark things without thinking, wanting to brand you and really do think sooo badly about the word 'MILLER'.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Now if you were a puppy miller, it would be a completely different story. Puppy Millers are branded so hard that ppl that know what a puppy mill is will never wish to get any puppy from one. In a nutshell, puppies need a LOT more space, time, care and food compared to hamsters and gliders. They are more intelligent and suffer greatly from neglect. The 'minimum cost at maximum output' also applies here, so imagine the care and diet given to these poor souls. For those who don't know, just go look in youtube, specially the ones involving PETA, as they go undercover and take real footage of puppy mills.
Your post about the gliders and Iory's opinion and stuff is already self-explanatory. It all started with a simple, 'Advise from a typical miller', why do you feel you must defend this word from ppl so much? Unless you are one? Especially when I did not say he/she is a glider miller? If a person is doing something that fits that criteria, like the example I put on myself, the person is considered a miller for certain type(s) of animal(s).
So because millers are feeding their gliders apples and cat food, must we do so too? Is it wrong to say that the advise is from a miller so that the person receiving the advise would know and we can correct it? How else would you advise? 'Oh, that's what 'mass breeders of sugar gliders' feed their gliders to reduce cost and gain maximum output.' That actually sounds worse and the word 'mass breeder' will not be taken kindly. We do know ppl running glidermills, but yet we still do not brand them or reveal their identity. All we can do is educate possible future glider owners and let them decide. If they ask for an opinion directly on a certain glider, we will speak out our honest opinion because they asked for it.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Also, the condition in hamster mills and glider mills are very different. Hamsters actually have it worse in those real mass production mills that breed commercially in the thousands. There are even some mills that feed their hamsters nothing but turnips and one measly bag of hamster mix spread out to hundreds of hamsters like once a month. Those are not hamster mills, those are like, commercial millers/breeders for hamsters. Gliders don't really have that kind of situation because they are not so commercially bred as they don't fetch enough profit over maintenance. Hamsters can survive on almost anything but gliders can't, gliders don't undergo population booms like rodents that have between 4 to 10 in a litter and the demand for gliders is not as high as hamsters, gliders can't be sold RM4 to RM7 per head like hamsters. Hope they don't sink anywhere near that situation though.
----
Tired of writing such long replies, sorry to tumpang the hamsters in the topic though. Also, I won't go any further as I don't want this thread to be closed. Want to discuss further than this bout hamsters can welcome it in the Hamster thread. The spoilers are to make the post shorter and not such an eyesore.
This post has been edited by Reanne: Jan 23 2008, 07:35 AM