BF 2042 game.
I in top 5. Internet is good
I in less then top 10. Line is bad
Unifi Connection Issue to International Server, Occured usually at night 9-11pm
Unifi Connection Issue to International Server, Occured usually at night 9-11pm
|
|
Dec 9 2022, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
BF 2042 game.
I in top 5. Internet is good I in less then top 10. Line is bad |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 10 2022, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
my 20mbps 4G maxis perform better then this unfi when this shit happened.
|
|
|
Jan 18 2023, 09:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
One thing i noticed when gamming. If you use more data the internet is responsive. If you use less less responsive.
This might be CPU set to Auto on tm site. |
|
|
Jan 31 2023, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
Joke of the year.
My maxis Lte gamming experience is far better then my 300mbps fiber unfi. Time to switch to maxis fiber |
|
|
Mar 28 2023, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
I am sick with this slow connection. Time to leave unfi.
|
|
|
Jun 4 2023, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2023, 09:34 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2023, 12:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
Problem coming back
|
|
|
Dec 23 2023, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
Is the local node is that slow us down. Own Tmnet internal hardware.
|
|
|
Dec 23 2023, 03:08 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(go626201 @ Dec 23 2023, 02:38 PM) We know it is tm issue,but the problem is we need OVH to get contact with TM for pressing tm to fix it. Maxis on tm infra also effectedSince we normal home user report TM do not have enough power to force tm for fixing it. This post has been edited by OlgaC4: Dec 23 2023, 03:09 PM |
|
|
Jan 16 2024, 08:38 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(dev/numb @ Jan 15 2024, 09:52 PM) Noticed past few days my ping to SG VPN server improved greatly, even during peak night time. Is their own tm hardware. They have fix it.Traceroute revealed change of peering provider. Previously mine was going through PCCW. Now Level3. Very surprised. No wonder everywhere raining. Hopefully I didn’t jinx it with this post and it continues like this. |
|
|
Jan 18 2024, 09:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 19 2024, 10:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2024, 11:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(go626201 @ Jan 20 2024, 12:14 AM) Not sure which dns server u are using,my end all giving low ping ip. This ping already high. I got much lower then this.ping s1.hdslb.com Pinging s1.hdslb.com.w.kunlunar.com [163.181.88.174] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 163.181.88.174: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=55 Reply from 163.181.88.174: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=55 Reply from 163.181.88.174: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=55 Reply from 163.181.88.174: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=55 ping api.live.bilibili.com and ping www.bilibili.com Pinging i.w.bilicdn1.com [164.52.39.42] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 164.52.39.42: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=53 Reply from 164.52.39.42: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=53 Reply from 164.52.39.42: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=53 Reply from 164.52.39.42: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=53 |
|
|
Jan 21 2024, 03:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(BenYeeHua @ Jan 21 2024, 03:13 PM) Interesting, after posting here about that issues, miyoho redirect MY player to another IP address, which result back to normal 100ms. last week ok then 2days suck then ok back» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Past 2 week it had been going via SG instead of strange 200ms or 300ms one. Gonna see how long it last. --- Also, Google DNS sometimes failed to give this domain's A result for TM IPv6 address, unsure what's happen. https://archive.is/ |
|
|
Feb 8 2024, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(Haru97 @ Feb 8 2024, 08:52 AM) Anybody notices unifi to Equinix SG is really bad recently? After I got disconnected 2 days ago from a game in call of duty, the internet from Unifi to Equinix Singapore never be the same anymore. I don't think this is an issue from Unifi, I am NOT SURE(somebody please verify), but this might be a problem associated with Equinix datacenter. Cause I connect to VPN in singapore(amazon) and join another call of duty game, it seems like they experience high ping from their relay server as well. Test your ipv6.Reddit, steam(they switched route, taking long path now), cloudflare(some part), all equinix route seems affected. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Feb 8 2024, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(go626201 @ Feb 8 2024, 08:51 PM) SG to MY was never a cable issue,it just didn't have the right routing and configuration. Is the Tm server local network that mess up.There are multiple SG to MY cable for long time,and i think TM should have own some of those cable,and They just didn't configure it for long-term unifi consumer usage. And the most problem is TM should just implement a "dedicated" long-term optimized routing for the connection between SG and MY. As you can see this 2days ago routing issue not just affect connection to SG,it also include some asia server. They already have the optimized routing that can be use for connecting some server,but they didn't configure it for unifi user. Simple example: ![]() This post has been edited by OlgaC4: Feb 8 2024, 09:49 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2024, 07:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,292 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0705sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 08:06 PM |