Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
21 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:01 PM)
Yup the kedah kelas is actually meko 100 at 1860 tons and become a river gun boat
*
I am talking about the 60 million dollar Tun fatimah class OPV, not the 300 million dollar Kedah class.


alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:03 PM)
The chinese LMS 700 tons from boustead I think isva gun boat. Correct me if I am wrong.

user posted image
*
Yes

everybody realise that fact.

Why it is a wasteful buy. And TLDM want to repeat with more wasteful buy for LMS Batch 2.

alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:10 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:07 PM)
Tun fatimah already cost 60 million, wow
*
user posted image

Tun Fatimah cost less than the LMS, while being as big as the Kedah class.
alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 18 2021, 11:20 PM)
How much for a gunboat version of the Damen lookalikes FAC?

If it's anything like the fassmer, does that mean TNI is paying RM150 million just to fit in those ASW missiles?
*
What is expensive?

latest 57mm Bofors gun, same like our Gowind with the FCR control system so that it could function as CIWS is expensive.

It got Denmark CMS, radar - expensive also

rumors of anti-ship missile from MBDA, not chinese C-705 of the 4 earlier KCR-60. also expensive.

No anti submarine warfare (ASW) system paid for. But technically can be installed.


There are trade-offs that i choose to make my planned alexLMS cheap. You just cannot have your cake and eat it too.

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 18 2021, 11:33 PM
alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:40 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:35 PM)
Why Malaysia do not involve TLDM and local buillders to cooperate with either South Koreans or Finnish or Dutch on such projects?

South Korean built good warships. They have good ship builders. Indonesia learn a lot from south Korea and Dutch.  Or

If the vessel is good and suitable, why do not purchase from PT PAL Indonesia? 🤔🤔

Or prefer pay 5x extra  and buy from France ended kaput project?
*
.


France has nothing to do with the program going kaput.

alexz23
post Sep 18 2021, 11:57 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 18 2021, 11:55 PM)
We did south Korean before.
Remember the gagah samudera?

Doesn't end up well either. Korean move on the Philippines also doesn't end well. KFX jet to ID is 50:50, and Korean submarine which itself is based on German design are being undercut by German who is now negotiating directly with ID.

Military sells is a cut throat bussiness. At the end foreign sales are most likely being subsidies by local taxes payers. And thus the reason why F35A is half the price of rafales or type 31 is cheaper than a gowind.

For a small country like us, self sufficiency in military equipment design shouldn't be a policies at all.
*
.


South korea also has nothing to do with the gagah samudera going kaput.


KFX jet SK to ID is 80:20

the korean subs is just Indonesia playing victim. Daewoo build those subs exactly as what Indonesia prepared to pay for it. Indonesia didn't pay for the harpoon missile and torpedoes for the daweoo submarines and it is the korean fault?

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 12:01 AM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 12:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:59 PM)
Of course it is not France problem. But Naval Group corvettes poorly armed are very high price. At that time Gowind 3100 ton RM$1.52 bil a vessel or US$400 million.

TLDM specs for missile system was never short range Mica (effective range 12 km) . TLDM has specified ESSM on MK 41 VLS launcher with 40 km range. As you know MK 41 launcher can accomodate 4 missile persilo. Hence 8 silo can accomodate 32 VLS missile. The land attack missile was Konesburg.

Thats why Thales Smart S-Mk2 Pesa fire radar  was selected because this radar is primarily use in conjunction with essm mk 41 VLS. But again a lower spec French product was given priority over the better one at same price.

Our Gowind cannot fire Aster missile because Gowind do not operate on Thales Herakles PESA Radar.

Instead of producing multi purpose light frigate / corvettee, it came out as ASW corvette but at a very ripped off price.
*
lots of wrong assumption there

as i said previously, in 2011 when the contract was signed, at that time the ESSM needs to have its own dedicated target illuminator installed. Because it is a semi-active radar equipped missile. There would be big modification to the Godwind to fit ESSM.

ESSM block 2 has just fully operational in 2020. this has the same active radar as MICA, so no need dedicated target illuminator.

Its easy to say I prefer ESSM, because personally I do. But technically, engineering-wise I understand why they push back ESSM in 2011.

In the hindsight it is okay because the new VL MICA NG has similar range to ESSM and is the same size as the original VL MICA missile. Of course iVL MICA NG is still disadvantaged with no possibility of quad packing. To change to ESSM block 2 now would mean more modifications, more money to be added and more delays to the program

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 12:13 AM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 12:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 12:35 AM)
Guess that's where the rebooted LMS comes in.
If anything the RLMS is likely just a tun Fatimah but with ESSM. And probably with minesweeper and/or hydro ship equipment install.

*
Fittting ESSM will need highly capable 3D radar at least similar in performance to the SMART-S mk2 on the gowind, CMS like the tacticos + other stuff. That would push the price to at least 250 million dollars if you are putting NSM also.

But what for? Can a 22 knot 1860 tonne ship like Tun fatimah do anything in a war scenario? Can it keep up sailing with the Gowinds at 28 knots? Or can it do FAC tactics in melacca straits, pulau banggi and tawau waters? MCM process needs large space and crane to carry unmanned boats and unmanned underwater vehicles. If you want a Tun fatimah to do MCM, probably it is to be modified specially for that purpose only.

This is damen proposal for MCM ship based on its OPV hull

user posted image

in my opinion just let OPVs be OPVs.


This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 01:08 AM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 01:16 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 11:59 PM)


Of course it is not France problem. But Naval Group corvettes poorly armed are very high price. At that time Gowind 3100 ton RM$1.52 bil a vessel or US$400 million.


*
gowind expensive?

Brazil is paying for souped up meko a100 similar to TLDM Kedah class for 500 million euro each!!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamandar%C3%A9-class_frigate

alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 11:10 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 19 2021, 09:21 AM)
I read the navy requirements in certain publications. When you have politikus who knew nuts about naval vessels and weapon sistem to decide, what decision we see???😁

The navy requested for ESSM, they know it well that they need it. Remember the Naval officer, Captain or XO are the one that going to operate the vessels.Not politikus.

I do not think your reasons are the main reasons. The naval officers are also involved in system selection from the 1st stage and i bet they know what they are doing better then all of us here.

They try to do away with French weapon system. The Thales Smart S-Mk2 is the prime radar use if ESSM is considered. Thats why those involved were frustrated. You pay for 5 star but get 4 star accomodation.
*
So what radar do you assume Maharajalela will get if it is not the thales SMART-S mk2?

The thales SMART-S mk2 is the radar offered by Naval Group, it is what fitted to the Maharajalela now even with VL MICA. It is what fitted to Egyptian Gowinds. It is fully integrated into the naval group PSIM (Panoramic Sensors and Intelligence Module)

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/0...ndria-shipyard/

user posted image

user posted image
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 11:26 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 06:01 AM)
Thought this MCM mothership are build by Damen & naval group?


*
this iteration of the Damen MCM was designed on the Tun Fatimah Hull.
user posted image

But personally I am against 1 mission only MCM ships. Future MCM systems are all modular so why still waste money to have dedicated specialised MCM ships? You could do it off OSVs supported by multiple small multi role ships.

QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 06:01 AM)
Then the acquisition of the gowind is a good thing then.

*
The plan and idea for the gowind is good. The execution is a total failure.

But now for LMS batch 2 and Kedah Batch 2, the plan and idea is already a failure and will be a waste of money.

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 12:00 PM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 11:40 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 19 2021, 07:21 AM)
If your cosideration only on size then another option is the PT PAL Makassar class LPD cost only $45 Mio.
It is 122m ship with amphibious capability plus 2 units LCU inside the ship.
*
If for MMEA I would prefer a fully naval spec 4,000 tonne 140m OPV like this ship. Can a commercial spec ferry based makassar class play the ramming game with chinese coast guard OPVs and survive?


2 ships for 90 billion korean won, or 77 million dollars. 1 ship 38.5 million dollars or RM161.7 million.

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/0...st-guard-fleet/

user posted image




QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 19 2021, 07:30 AM)
You can not compare this ship to Kedah directly..
Its length only 107m but the weight is 3500 tons. It is heavier than 115m formidable class. Many things they put on it.

But I preffer type 31 than this.
*
I am not comparing them to the Kedah. I was comparing it to the Gowind. Just a statement that those Brazilian ships are based on the same Meko A100 design as the Kedah.

Personally i would prefer the Type 31 for TLDM lekiu and kasturi replacement too.



QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 19 2021, 07:42 AM)
60m ship is big enough for MCM, why need a bigger one?
*
Future MCM systems are mostly modular. It does not need dedicated ships. So to clean up a large minefield, a large ship like an OSV as the mothership plus smaller ships (like my proposed LMS alternative) to carry UUVs and USVs to tackle multiple suspected mines further from the mothership at the same time is the way to go.

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 02:52 PM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 11:53 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 19 2021, 09:09 AM)
.

Hence what make us think by buying the Blue Print one can built a modern stealth warship of current generation.???
*
We can.

ships, stealthy or not uses normal diesel or gas turbine engines. Just buy them.

Combat management system. just buy them.

weapons, missiles, torpedoes. just buy them.

If you are not going to reinvent the wheel to recreate every nut and bolt from scratch, it can be done.

On our gowinds, buying the blueprint is not wrong (if the original blueprint is wrong, even the Egyptian gowind would be wrong), our technical and manufacturing capability is not wrong. It is the other things. You need to differentiate them.

what is wrong is the constant need to change and add new things after the project has started.

what is wrong is the government inability to firmly do decisions on timely manner

plus plenty other things. but that does mean that we cannot build a stealth warship.





also why should we want to build them locally?

just think of it, if we spend billions on the ship, do we want thousands of europeans feel the benefits, or do you want thousands of local families getting the economic benefits from building the ship locally?

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 12:03 PM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 12:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 19 2021, 10:25 AM)
My tought is...
ID is collecting all 5K-6K ton frigate, exploring  what benefit they can get before they decide which one or two can give most benefit for them not only for TNI but their local marine industry too.
*
If they want to do rojak, let them do rojak.

Malaysia can emulate the good things they do, and not touch the not so good things they are doing.

For example, they take arrowhead, we must not be shy to take arrowhead type 31 too because it is a good ship and will strengthen our ties with UK.

But doing the rojak? no thank you.

alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 03:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 03:27 PM)

Technically the gov are firm in her decision

*
Firm is in doing decisions.

When ringgit exchange rate fell, when BNS needs the money to to pay for all the changes requested, MINDEF under matsabu cannot decide anything and the project just grinded to a halt. and has been idle for more than 2 years now.

even now the government decision on the gowinds is still not clear.
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 03:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 03:10 PM)
It's a rebooted not a 2nd batch. Kedah & chinese LMS is BNS product. Doubt any politicians brave enough to give anything to BNS anymore.
*
whatever you call it lah, even if you give it to other people. but the basic plan and the TLDM requirements is not the best capability for the money that is going to be spent.

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 03:41 PM
alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 05:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 04:34 PM)
.
To be fair to mat Sabu,  Put yourself in his shoe, the cost had increase by 40%, and retrofitting the ship to fullfil RMN wishlist would shoot the cost even higher. Tell the rakyat that it's all his predecessor fault does nothing as people would say, he's the menteri now,fix it.Unfortunately for him no easy solution are found, like for example let cancelled the some ship like gagah samudera, or let's not arms it like kedah. Not helping that At that point in time, the rakyat mood is more towards pacifism.He need some kind of justification to tell the already angry rakyat why more money need to be dump in. Not really the easiest thing to do.


*
Who says being a minister is easy?

If he cannot do and make decisions, why do you become a defence minister?

coming from a party called "amanah", he should have known how big the responsibility is.

and what did he do? he didn't decide on anything!

alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 05:07 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 19 2021, 04:44 PM)
You can built one in Naval Group France and 5 in Boustead. Give local engineers and technician the hands on skill learning from Naval Group engineervactually building the ship

Then built the balance 5 here. How much it cost you extra of building one in Naval Group to ensure success of fhe project ?  Total project cost is RM$9.12 billion, not a small sum.

I bet ST Marine Engineering Spore is a much experience and higher technology yard . Now they even built future Singapore destroyer and LPD (Helicopter carrier)

When building Formudable class, the 1st unit was built in Naval Group with ST Maribe engineers there. The balance 5 in Sppre.

I bet they also take the opportunity to exposed and learn as much.

And all 6 Formidable class complete on time in service for years 😁

Even china admit the main disadvantage of J-10, J-15, J-20, FC-31 is reliable high thrust turbofan jet engines. They have been depending on Saturn-30 and now developed the WS-10 which still derived from P & W F119. WS-10 still need years to be perfected.

I hope we can learn from China attitude. Yes you can built figher but if you do not have reliable engines liked F404, F414 , F100-220 or saturn 30 you cannot keep your jet in the sky.
*
why we didn't do that is water ubder the bridge.

and china attitude of their fighters and their engines has nothing that can relate to building ships.

alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 06:54 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 19 2021, 06:41 PM)
Yup , after pouring in , i expected the RM$9.12 billion.

The korean ckd incheon class FFX from Hyundai. US$330 circle I think at 3200 tons. CODOG powered. 30 knots. Naval shield mgmt system. 1 gun. 1 RAM  and land attack missiles. Basically they based on American system. If ckd this version better.
*
as i said

water under the bridge.

very easy to lament on what ifs...

difficult to actually plan and decide on what to do next considering our current situation. those uncompleted gowinds just won't disappear into thin air.



alexz23
post Sep 19 2021, 08:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 19 2021, 08:19 PM)
At US 330 mil,  better CKD the type 31.almost Same price,twice the ship size.

The jose Rizal class shows that the Korean are no better than the french at pushing their what some may consider ' inferior but similarly price equipment' to the Pinoy. Thought the Joe Rizal class price of RM 655 millions do comes close to rebooted LMS prices of RM 500 millions.
*
Type 31 obviously should be our future frigate, to replace our Lekius and Kasturis one to one. Its affordable price, its functionality, its ties to UK all makes it the default choice for Malaysia.

But that does not mean we must forget about those gowinds, also those wasteful plans for expensive lowly armed ships.

We really need to reboot our future plans, and we need to swallow our pride and complete those gowinds as per designed (no FFBNW shenanigans) whatever it costs.

This post has been edited by alexz23: Sep 19 2021, 08:43 PM

21 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0939sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 04:24 AM