Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
Lampuajaib
post Sep 24 2021, 07:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 23 2021, 06:00 PM)
.
Whatever the italian navy calls that ship, that 560 million euro 143m 6,000 tonnes ship by all practical purposes is a general purpose frigate.



user posted image

user posted image
*
So weird....full armed frigate but called opv.
I'll choose Italian fremm than this...why the Italian build this ship if they can build fremm with $560 Mio?

Lampuajaib
post Sep 24 2021, 07:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 24 2021, 07:42 AM)
New CN235-NextG MPA for the Indonesian Navy currently undergoing flight test. Credit to akangaviation.

user posted image

https://www.instagram.com/p/CT15AKnBSDC/
*
Why it is called nextG MPA?
Lampuajaib
post Sep 25 2021, 11:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
MY bought 4x4 at 8x8 price tag and bought 8x8 at MBT price tag and bought a light frigate at destroyer price tag.

Lampuajaib
post Sep 25 2021, 03:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Sep 25 2021, 11:55 AM)
what new destroyer do you get for usd450-ish million?
*
$450 Mio?
Let's calculate the the closest option.
After RM 6 B is paid another RM 3 B is needed to finished 2 units LCS. That is RM4.5 B for each ship. RMN can get a DDG for US$1.2 B
Lampuajaib
post Sep 25 2021, 08:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Sep 25 2021, 07:01 PM)
9 billion ringgit for 6 ship la bro check your source jangan main sebat je
*
This....
QUOTE
Option one was to get Naval Group – the state owned French company and design authority – to act as the main contractor replacing Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) or option two allow BNS – a Malaysian state owned company and main contractor for the LCS – to complete two ships for another RM3 billion. The third option was to find another company to revive the project.

Later the cabinet rule out option 1.
There are only option 2 and 3 still available.

Option 3 is another copy of NGPV solution....you can guess lah ..

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 25 2021, 08:59 PM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 26 2021, 03:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 26 2021, 01:18 PM)
.
Tell me what manufacturing problem?

The admirals who asked for changes dont work for TLDM but BNS is it?

Mat Sabu who did not decide on anything works for BNS is it?
don't you understand that there is no agreed final specs from the customer

How to complete when there is no agreed final specs??????
*
You asked a wrong question...it should be "Why the project was started if there was no agreed final specs?
Maybe it was planned to be failed....why? even a failed project is good for certain people.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 26 2021, 03:14 PM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 26 2021, 04:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 26 2021, 03:31 PM)
there is a set of specs when started, but after start, additional specs are added, specs are changed. and the government don't want to pay for all those changes that was requested. but no decision to proceed with original specs.
*
Still there is no final specs...no final specs no project.
A set of specs is still a raw specs.
Lampuajaib
post Sep 27 2021, 04:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 27 2021, 12:23 PM)
Well obviously the highly professional general with 20 years experience the One who didn't want a simple brown water Navy equipment that the Gowind are design for. Probably because they don't want to be a brown water navy anymore kot?
WTF...why this general become a target to be blame?
RMN can only go as far as give spesification and suggestion. Decision is made by cabinet/mindef.

Remember how RMN want tacticos but must accept setis? Somebody will say that setis finally accepted by RMN. What this finally means? Even if RMN disagree will they speak it out openly?
Lampuajaib
post Sep 28 2021, 09:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 28 2021, 08:01 PM)
I like FDI design...but compare to her price tag no thank you. I"ll choose AH140 anytime
Lampuajaib
post Sep 29 2021, 09:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 28 2021, 05:16 PM)
user posted image
user posted image

A day or two ago, TNI published the video in youtube the succes of OPV KCR 40 equipped with Denmark made (Western CMS) Terma C Naval Combat Management System and Terma radar BUT fired a CHINA made C-705 anti ship  missle and hit target. Terma is widely use in many corvettes.

Well a western CMS integrate with a China made missle. Why not?

What is the price of KCR 40 and the larger KCR 60 as opv gun boat or as missle boat
*
Integration is the key ....you can mix anything if you can make them integrated.
You have to make a bridge or adapter or modified the software to make things integrated.
Don't expect all parts in weapon system can be installed plug and play.
Integration is serious challenge.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 29 2021, 09:08 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 30 2021, 07:59 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 30 2021, 06:58 AM)
This is not a KCR-60M but an Indonesian Navy Parchim Class.
*
Ah...parchim class, corvette size ship ex east germany ship. ID has 16 units.
They already over 40+ years old too.
There are also 6 units frigate of van speijk class that already 50+ years old.
16+6=22 units that need replacement gradually.

Looks like ID will not stop at FREMM and AH140.
Other types or more units are needed in the future.
No wonder their menhan actively makes contact with many shipbuilders.

And...ID seems can execute their replacement program nicely.
I guess those parchim class will be upgraded to light frigate size and van speijk replacement will be a 6000 ton frigate.
But how many light frigate and full frigate combination ID will operate in the future are maybe differ from the old one.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 30 2021, 08:31 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 30 2021, 08:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 30 2021, 02:53 AM)
Never realize that the defense white paper is already out in the public domain.

Some infographic from the defense white paper

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

Plans acquisition for the next 10 years

Kawasan teras
*ATM akan mewujudkan Angkatan Amfibi bagi melindungi kepentingan negara melangkau kawasan teras. Angkatan Amfibi ini perlu dilengkapi Kapal Sokongan Pelbagai Guna (Multi Role Support Ship, MRSS)

*Angkatan Masa Hadapan memerlukan 155mmSelf-Propelled Howitzer (SPH) sebagai bantuan tembakan tidak langsung yang utama yang juga boleh digunakan untuk pertahanan pantai. ATM juga perlu menggantikan 105mm Light Howitzer yang telah usang dengan senjata baharu yang mempunyai jarak tembakan yang lebih Jauh danmempunyai ketepatan menembak yang lebih baik

*Angkatan Masa Hadapan memerlukan sistem Pertahanan Udara Jarak Sederhana (Medium Range Air Defence, MERAD) baharu

*ATM perlu menggantikan Kenderaan Perisai (Armoured Vehicle, AV) yang uzur kepada yang lebih baharu dengan perlindungan yang lebih baik, meningkatkan daya tembak, ketahanan yang lebih tinggi dan kemampuan amfibi. Keperluan ini bagi memastikan pasukan
Armor dan Mekanize boleh diatur gerak di seluruh kawasan teras yang bentuk muka buminya boleh menjadi sangat mencabar terutama di Sabah dan Sarawak.

* Angkatan Masa Hadapan juga memerlukan Helikopter Pengangkut Taktikal (Tactical Transport Helicopter) untuk diatur gerak secara cepat dan bot tempur untuk operasi sungai dan pantai.

"Bagi melindungi ruang udara dan menyokong operasi daratan, operasi maritim dan operasi amfibi di kawasan teras, Angkatan Masa Hadapan memerlukan Pesawat Tempur Ringan (Light Combat Aircraft, LCA) untuk Bantuan Udara Rapat (Close Air Support, CAS), Serangan Udara Medan Tempur (Battlefield Air Interdiction, BAI) dan operasi pemintasan untuk menyokong Pesawat Tempur Pelbagai Guna (Multi Role Combat Aircraft, MRCA). LCA juga akan melaksanakan peranan berganda sebagai pesawat latihan pejuang (Fighter Lead-In Trainer, FLIT)

*Bagi operasi maritim di dalam kawasan teras, ATM akan mengaturgerak Kapal Misi Pesisir (Littoral Mission Ship, LMS) yang boleh menjalankan pelbagai misi termasuk SAR dan HADR, antikeganasan dan antipelanunan, pengumpulan risikan dan peninjauan, hidrografi
dan antiperiuk api.LMS adalah reka bentuk modular dan boleh dilengkapi dengan senjata dan sistem tambahan untuk memenuhi keperluan operasi masa hadapan.


* ATM juga merancang untuk memperoleh
Kenderaan Bawah Permukaan Autonomi (Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, AUV) dan Kenderaan Pemusnah Periuk Api (Mine Disposal Vehicle, MDV) untuk menyokong operasi maritim di kawasan teras
Kawasan Lanjutan

*ATM perlu mencapai Kawalan Laut (Sea Control) di permukaan dan bawah permukaan melalui Penafian Laut (Sea Denial) dan Penegasan Laut (Sea Assertion). Justeru, ATM bergantung pada dua kelas kapal perang iaitu Kapal Tempur Pesisir (Littoral Combat Ship, LCS) dan Kapal Ronda Generasi Baru (New Generation Patrol Vessel, NGPV) yang mampu melaksanakan operasi di kawasan ini dengan jarak, ketahanan dan keupayaan yang diperlukan

*Sementara itu, NGPV sedia ada juga boleh dilengkapi dengan sistem
senjata tambahan jika diperlukan.

*MDA akan dipertingkatkan lagi dengan Pesawat Ronda Maritim (Maritime Patrol Aircraft,MPA) dan Sistem Udara Tanpa Pemandu Aras Sederhana Ketahanan Tinggi (Medium Altitude Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial System, MALE UAS) untuk melaksanakan rondaan pengawasan maritim dari udara. ATM memerlukan Helikopter Misi
Maritim untuk meningkatkan keupayaan kapal tempur baru yang dijangka beroperasi pada akhir tempoh KPP ini. Setiap sistem penderia (sensor) dan sistem komunikasi dari kapal tempur, MPA, MALE UAS dan helikopter akan dirangkaikan ke Pusat NCO ATM untuk MDA yang lebih menyeluruh di kawasan lanjutan.

*Sistem Radar Pertahanan Udara tambahan akan membantu mencapai litupan radar yang menyeluruh dan pengawasan ruang udara sepanjang
masa 24/7, kawalan ruang udara dan tindakan penguatkuasaan.Kerajaan memperakui bahawa melindungi dan mempertahankan kawasan lanjutan adalah sangat mencabar untuk ATM. Sehubungan itu,kerjasama dengan agensi keselamatan yang lain seperti APMM dan pihak berkuasa seperti Jabatan Perikanan dapat memperluaskan liputan untuk melindungi ZMM. ATM juga dipertangggungjawabkan untuk membantu tugas penguatkuasaan bagi menyokong agensi keselamatan yang lain.
Kawasan Hadapan

*Untuk melindungi dan mempertahankan kepentingan nasional di luar negara dan memenuhi tanggungjawab global serta melaksanakan operasi di kawasan hadapan, ATM bergantung pada kuasa udara (MRCA, Pesawat Pengangkut Bahan Api, Pesawat Pengangkut Strategik),
Angkatan Kapal Selam, dan Pasukan Khas. Untuk mempertahankan kawasan hadapan secara efektif, MRCA berupaya melaksanakan serangan strategik dan Gerak Balas Serangan Udara (Offensive Counter Air, OCA) terhadap sasaran udara, maritim dan darat.

Pada masa kini, ATM bergantung kepada pesawat F/A-18D dan SU-30MKM untuk misi ini dan penggantian akan dibuat setelah pesawat-pesawat ini mencapai tempoh tamat perkhidmatan pada Rancangan Malaysia ke-14 dan ke-15

"TUDM berhasrat untuk melengkapkan No 18 Skuadron kepada 18 buah pesawat Hornet dalam RMKe-12. Kombinasi F/A-18D
dan SU-30MKM adalah paling ampuh di rantau ini yang memberi kelebihan kepada Malaysia berbanding negara-negara terdekat.
*Bagi serangan jarak jauh dan cegah rintang oleh angkatan laut dikawasan hadapan, ATM kini mengoperasikan dua kapal selam kelas Perdana Menteri dengan keupayaan antiperiuk api serta
antipermukaan dan antikapal selam untuk melaksanakan maneuver jarak jauh secara halimunan

*ATM memberi keutamaan tinggi kepada kemampuan Pasukan Khas dalam melaksanakan operasi khas di kawasan hadapan. Pasukan Khas memberi kelebihan kepada kerajaan dalam melindungi kepentingan negara di kawasan hadapan. Keutamaan akan diberikan kepada
Pasukan Khas ATM dalam perolehan senjata dan peralatan khusus untuk melaksanakan operasi mereka. Di samping itu, latihan dan pembangunan keupayaan akan diteruskan dengan Pasukan Khas negara sahabat dan rakan pertahanan.
https://www.mod.gov.my/ms/maklumat/kertas-putih-pertahanan
Guess  i guess quite a lot correctly then.
*
I must say overall there will be no major upgrade capability until 2040-2050.
MY even must struggle to keep defence capability


Lampuajaib
post Oct 5 2021, 12:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 5 2021, 12:37 PM)
Instead of looking at new conventional submarines, used submarines (of which the budget was already approved) or submarine rescue vessel, the Indonesian navy is now looking at compact submarines.

user posted image

http://www.hisutton.com/images/Italy-Drass...t-Submarine.jpg
*
Maybe they want to put them on their fremm or AH140

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 5 2021, 12:54 PM
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 07:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Oct 5 2021, 08:59 PM)
US$720 million  or RM$3.03 billion for 2 multi purpose frigate (AAW and ASW capability) at between 5700 tons to 6,000 tons each. Let say add another RM$1 billion for cost over run , the total is only RM$4.03 billion for for two units of 5700 tons to 6000 tons boats capable of AAW and ASW. Means one boat highest price RM$2.015 billion.

Lets see Gowind 3100 ton a boat after completion cost how much a boat. It was priced at RM$9.12 billion for 6 boat or RM$1.52 billion a boat.

We would see at the end after paying RM$9.12 billion how many Gowind 3100 TLDM will get😁😁 and we know the price per boat.

Do your maths later😁
*
Correction
ID pay $720 mio (RM 3 B) for 2 units
MY already pay RM 6B and need additional RM 3 B to complete 2 units.

2 AH140 only RM 3B vs 2 Gowind RM 9 B
(ID win first round)

MY and ID try to build the ships locally. This is interesting will PT PAL can delivered the ship on time? meanwhile BNS already delay for years.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 6 2021, 07:37 AM
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 07:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 5 2021, 08:59 PM)
UMW aerospace never did composites. It was established specifically to supply metallic jet engine components to RR.

Even though we don't export whole completed aircraft like Indonesia, our aerospace export value is like 10x of indonesia.

indonesian aerospace export value is only around 100 million dollars annually.

malaysian aerospace export value is more than 1 billion dollars annually.
*
ID builds aero manufacturing factory (flyable plane and some parts for local and export) while MY builds spare parts factory only.
ID local demad is big enough while MY is export oriented because can not build plane. That is why MY export look bigger than ID.

Comparing ID and MY Aero industry is not apple to apple. MY is too far behind.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 6 2021, 08:06 AM
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 08:04 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 5 2021, 09:53 PM)
If they want to be self sufficient, they need to make the N219 like we build buses. Creating something like prasarana in malaysia to buy hundreds of N219 to be used all over Indonesia. Giving subsidised flying service to rural indonesians. If not it will not be a self sufficiency drive.

On the other hand, Indonesia also wants to embed themselves into the global supply chain.

But currently what they do is mostly low tech metal fuselage and wing components. also those components are for low volume products like EC225/EC225M that sells like 2 dozen per year.

malaysia supplies components for almost all airbus and boeing aircraft that is being built annually.
ID orientation is making plane not parts, they have started since 1970 that is why PT DI deal mostly in metal. Meanwhile MY orientation is making parts and deal with composite material which is start in 90s.

ID is now start to make composite and need repeat order from big plane manufacturer such as Airbus and Boeing. I think this is just how they make additional money.

If you say ID is 30 late on composite material parts then MY is late almost 50 years and still counting to ID on aero manaufacturing.
I am not suggesting MY to build aero manufacturing factory because it will a failed one on some reasons, even the famous Fokker had already gone.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 6 2021, 08:33 AM
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 08:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Oct 5 2021, 09:23 PM)
Different country different needs.

They are going for self sufficiency similar to Korea & turkey while we are going to embedded ourselves deeper in the global supplies chain.
*
Exactly....
Bring a self sufficient means you need us than I need you. It help in any bargain both economy and diplomatic relationship.
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 08:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Oct 5 2021, 10:36 PM)

If not mistaken, France offer local assembly of rafales to us before. Which probably explains why ID are interested in KFX & Rafale despite it being twice the price of an American jet.

Overtime they would acquired IP for last gen weapon like Korea acquisition of KFX(which basically a nice looking super hornet), M11a1, 30mm dual aircraft gun, reverse engineered the s400 and so on.
*
As we all know ID orientation is know how and self sufficient. Boramae and KFX is 2 side of a coin. Buying rafale will open ID access to new tech in fighter jet weapon system, because US will not give any ToT. Although recently US give ID a capability MLU to upgrade their old F16 A/B locally but that will not help ID much.
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 10:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 6 2021, 09:19 AM)
As an industry, overall indonesian aerospace is small when compared to malaysia, even if it can build whole aircraft like CN-235, of which only the metal airframe is locally built, all the engines, avionics, radars, communications, hydraulic systems, even most of the raw materials is fully imported. Annually it manufactures less than 4 CN-235. Since 2012 PTDI has build just around 60 aircrafts, that number includes final assembly of helicopters from 100% overseas components for indonesian military.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/...s-di-rai-872466
.
Malaysia for RMK12, has underlined the aerospace industry as one of the main priorities.

user posted image

https://www.nst.com.my/business/2021/09/731...ace-sector-12mp
.
https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/...nue-2025-322062
*
And you still failed to understand when comparing ID and MY Aero indusrtry.
Even Honda uses subcon to build parts. Subcon can work if there is order from the parent company, all spesification and dimension parts are given. Even the parent company can set how much gain you can have if not they can find other to build for them.
Even Boeing and Airbus have subcon. Not all part are made by Boeing/airbus

Why you try so hard to compare? You must compare apple to apple then we can talk.
You can compare Boeing and Airbus or Embraer, Fokker, CASA and PT DI.

Sad thing is most major MY defence industries are failing.
Defrech, SMEO, BNS, are failling

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 6 2021, 10:20 AM
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 10:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 6 2021, 10:18 AM)
Even if you 100% design your own aeroplane, more than 50% of its components need to be imported. Even the aerospace spec aluminum need to be imported.

Selling less than a dozen aeroplane of your own design annually isn't going to create an aerospace industry.

Korea is having local aerospace industry for local consumption, and it has to take hard decisions. For example retiring perfectly airworthy 100+ blackhawks so that 100+ new Surion helicopters could be bought locally. Korea also exports a lot of aerospace materials. For example all F-15 fuselage now is made by KAI and shipped to USA for final assembly.

As it is right now, in SEA, singapore has the largest aerospace industry by far. Malaysia in 2nd place. By 2030 Malaysia aims to be the largest aerospace industry player in SEA. Indonesia cannot be a large aerospace player just by building its own aircraft.
*
Then you should understand when comparing.something, right?

You can compare MY and SG areo industry because both are apple to compare


9 Pages « < 6 7 8 9 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0262sec    0.81    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 09:54 PM