it's not really 1080p, as u can see it's still uses 1,049,088 (1,366 x 768) pixels, just that the chipset able to produce near 1080p picture quality.

i went to another shop, have a look on Sharp Aquos LC32A53M, got offer for RM3600 cash. anyone have experience on this product?

common features of TX-32LX700MK & LC32A53M:

- 32"
- 100Hz
- 1,366 x 768 pixels

please give comment on both products...

yes..100hz eliminates ghosting..if u really wanna c d difference,play games that is action paced and fast..there will be no ghosting at all..it's like VGA card..100hz increased fps.let say if u use ati 2900xt (assume that it is 100hz tv) and compare it with ati 2600xt( 50hz lcd tv),2900xt will increased ur fps in gaming,that is all about..and another thing is,to my eyes,text are more sharper compare to normal lcd tv..1mp and 1.33mp is actually the resolution of the tv itself..if u have big pocket and 32 inch is ur target,go for pana 700mk or sony d series,basically starting from now,most manufacturers wil start using new hdmi interface as like HDMI 1.3..and this input can accept 1080P contents.BUT,it is just a marketing hype,32 inchers like pana 700mk and sony d series,still can't display true HD reso (1920 x 1080) juz like wat they hav promoted their products.this is because their panel reso is still the same old 1366 x 768..when the accept 1080p signal thru hdmi port,it will downscale it to d tv resolution which is 1366 x 768..if u can wait..sharp will be releasing new models..and they have 37 inch fullHD tv ( 1920 x 1080)..no offense,but lots of people asked me,why u waste so much money buying 32 inch lcd tv for RM4499 while u can get 32 inchers as low as RM2599,well..if u really want a very good LCD tv,u have to consider few factors,such as what type of panel they use?and most new lcd used new S-IPS technology..YES,that is so true..BUT are those all IPS panel will give u same color reproduction?how bout clouds?color banding?backlight bleeding?dead pixels?..we have to take notes all of that..i hav a friend looking to buy a new lcd tv..n i was bout selling my old LCD tv( which is LG 32LC2R )m selling cheap,letting it go for RM 1.5k only.but my panel has no backlight bleeding n cloud effect..i told him to get my lcd tv,i explained everything to him,but he did'nt buy mine,he bought a sony S200 32 inch old model for 2k plus.he was so happy,n when i go to his house to check out his new tv,i was like,oh man is this SONY??? the tv has a lot of noise,cloudiness,n backlight bleeding all over the panel,backlight bleeding at all 4 corners...the reason of what m explaining is juz to say that,not all big brands lcd tv manufacturers can offer u the best product,for my case,LG are known to be the most affordable brand for LCD TV n Plasma TV,and sony is a well known brand..we shop for the best product,not the best brand..

I would say higher refresh rates will mean smoother motion and less eye fatigue. The refresh rates for most pc gaming rigs are around 85HZ (the higher the better) so for LCD tvs sporting 100HZ or 120HZ (PAL) refresh rates, it is a breakthrough and I do feel ghosting is related to response time.

Well, for action packed movies, like when King Kong swings and jumps while fighting the dinosaurs, it's smoother with 100hz. I have done A-B comparisons with Sony Bravia D & V series. That is what I feel. You can bring your own disc to test it. Of course, games will benefit the most with 100hz especially Gears Of War, FEAR and GRAW 2.

when u see 100Hz n 50Hz in CRT.. u can instantly see the different..  the price gap are also huge... 

100Hz CRT work like a line doubler...  make the big screen(29" above) without the horizontal line which u can see in 50Hz CRT...

but in LCD...  really significant??