hmmm....pg dunno le...

izit BHB shop? if in kl...that till b better offer...

y not buy from me when can get cheaper than outside?? can offer better price as u viewed my thread ord rite? 
32 1yr nia
exactly...pioneer 767 is for movie...music?haha...better get hifi le..

another 1 is panny 32lx700mk...

is up 2 u anyway...
if is me..i will go for sharp

---

Added on January 15, 2008, 1:30 amblueautumn...if is me..mayb i will go for sony since u wan good in music n movie...

Our TV signals are 50Hz (PAL). DVD movies are mostly 60Hz (NTSC).

On your second question, If your LCD TV is 720P (which is the case of the A53M) then

1) if you select 1080i in your DVD player, your TV will scale it to 720P
2) if you select 720P in your DVD player, it will pass through untouched (720P).
3) if you select 480i or 480P in your DVD player, your TV will scale it to 720P.

The rule is whatever compatible signal you input to your LCD TV  it will always be scaled to the native resolution.

btw, the purpose of a upscale DVD player is to upscale normal DVD (which is 480P) to 720P/1080i. Although your TV can also scale 480P to 720P , stand alone upscale player normally do the job better. That's why people buy good upscalers e.g Sony 76H, instead of  letting the TV do the upscale from a normal (Non upscale) 480i/P DVD player.

rm4.5 lik that
sony model is 32v300
huh...when u buy ur lcd?y din get from me?how much u buy it?     

nono...er....i think mayb both of us mistaken dy
i juz recommend u sony hts rather than pioneer if u wan those hts that is good for both music n movie...but if juz for movie..better take pioneer

for 32 lcd...i fully recommend sharp....

u buy hts from me le..i got sell sony too

music?then better buy micro hifi...

Went to BEST and evaluated the 32" 100Hz models all using normal std components. Tried it with both DVD and Blu-Ray movie. Here are the findings (based on my eyes of course):

Philips 9432 - Very smooth picture, outweigh D300. Natural colour. With USB.
Sharp A53M - PQ not as good as expected. Look blur / not as sharp as the rest of the models. Colour not sharp.
Sony 300 - Sharp colour and smooth motion picture.
Panasonic 700MK - Sharp colour and smooth picture. Comes with SD slot which others don't.

Overall my conclusion:
Am disappointed as the initial plan was to get A53M. But however after much thought and observation, now might consider D300 as it gives a balance result when watching DVD and Blu-Ray disc. In DVD, Philips provides really natural and smooth picture, but PQ on Blu-Ray is different as the details of picture (i.e face of person) looks computer generated. On the other hand, Panasonic is not bad at all, plus it comes with SD slot, which could be useful for viewing photos (at least to me). My 2 cents.....

if watch astro in sony...wat i can say is rly

My dad juz got a LG 32LC7R from a shop. RM 2299. Quite a decent price for its quality. Contrast ratio 10000:1 and its LCD panel..but the downside is 50hz only. The picture quality comparable to the Sharp one 

I replied ur PM earlier.

But u can join the discussion here.

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/602998/+40



So far, i'm very happy with it. It's definetely way better than my sister's Samsung 37" R7(or is it S7? The MBF card promotion LCD TV). I'm so glad i cancel that MBF order...wheew...

And yep, i use a Samsung HT-30XT. So far so good, maybe I'll add more info to the Samsung HT-30XT in the thread above later.

Just bought 2 x Samsung 32" R8 from Harvey Norman for my guest rooms. They have a price slash there.

RM2750 each. Free HDMI cables.