Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware The New MacBook/MacBook Pro Users Thread, Share your joy and your pain here

views
     
slacker
post Jan 16 2008, 01:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
With the MacWorld Expo just finished, I was expecting there will be an announcement for a processor update of Macbook from Merom to Penryn. Dissappointed. Seems like it is unlikely. Anyone tried the upgrade themselves?

slacker
post Feb 2 2008, 03:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
Tumpang tanya. Strictly speaking, are Macbook consider a Centrino? What wireless adapter and mobo is it using?

This post has been edited by slacker: Feb 2 2008, 03:09 PM
slacker
post Feb 2 2008, 07:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Bad Cyborg @ Feb 2 2008, 05:55 PM)
See the specs for yourself. Apple uses their own proprietary components.
*
It still didn't mention whether it uses Intel Mobile 965 Express chipset. However, the wireless module is AirPort Extreme Wi-Fi. So....it's a non-centrino notebook. Thanks.
slacker
post Feb 3 2008, 12:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(allvin @ Feb 2 2008, 08:58 PM)
wht you mean non-centrino? Btw, intel don't use centrino nowadays. Now they use "santa rosa". Yes. The latest macbook and macbook pro are use santa rosa platform. 2.2Ghz macbook and macbook pro are use T7500 core2duo processor 4MB L2 Cache, which support 800Mhz FSB. Of cos, those specific spec you can't find in apple site. Apple machines using so called "AirPort Extreme" but it is the same thing, just the name change. It is draft-N Broadcom brand. wink.gif The mainboard is using the latest Intel chipset.
*
Santa Rosa is the latest implementation of the Centrino platform. In order to qualify as a Santa Rosa notebook, it need to have at least the following component:

- Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom or Penryn processor)
- Intel Mobile 965 Express chipset
- Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN mini-PCIe Wi-Fi adapter

Apple wireless is using Broadcom chipset. Then, it is certainly not a Centrino notebook.

Just to be sure. Can Macbook owner try to run the below utility to confirm it?

http://downloadcenter.intel.com/download.a...D=1697&lang=eng

This post has been edited by slacker: Feb 3 2008, 01:22 AM
slacker
post Feb 5 2008, 03:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(supazta @ Feb 5 2008, 02:50 AM)
what about the performance?
4gb performance or 3gb?
*
Isn't that obvious? If you can utilise 4GB, of course bigger capacity is better.
slacker
post Feb 28 2008, 01:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(allvin @ Feb 27 2008, 02:14 PM)
lazy to re-type again. yawn.gif

Penryn has SSE4. With SSE4, it can speed up the instruction application (40% faster according to macrumors speculation). Although the cache is lower compare to merom, but overall performance still faster than merom wink.gif
*
It will be true if the program you are using are program to capitalized the new instructions set. I think the processor performance will lose out to merom at same speed. That's a clear 25% reduction in L2 cache. 25% of L2 cache is significant. You really need application utilising SSE4 to compensate it. I'll give the credit to the heat reduction in Penryn though.


Why on earth Apple is using the lower end version of Penryn on this update? I'm disappointed. Pure marketing gimmick.

I'm still waiting for the benchmark on common application......but i have a hunch that this lower end version of penryn will lose to merom with the same processing speed.

This post has been edited by slacker: Feb 28 2008, 02:05 AM
slacker
post Feb 28 2008, 04:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(allvin @ Feb 28 2008, 09:59 AM)
Intel is planning to replace the Santa Rosa mobile platform with Montevina this June.
Read more HERE

That's the answer. My guess is probably santa rosa can't support the high end Penryn. High end Penryn should be 1066MHz FSB, whereas santa rosa platform only support max of 800MHz FSB.

I second your above post. But for normal users like us, I highly doubt we can "feel" the speed. The benchmark will have differences  nod.gif
*
All Penryn to date running at 1066MHz FSB including the one using in the new Macbook. Rumors have it that this lower end version of Penryn will be phased out by the start of next year.
slacker
post Aug 12 2008, 08:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
Hi. Just want to ask you guys how much is a 2.4Ghz with 4GB macbook worth after using more than 3 months? The macbook still in good condition. My friend want to sell his and ask me to quote him. If the price is right he'll let go.
slacker
post Aug 12 2008, 09:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
that's insane drop more than 1k in 2 weeks. I would classify it as exceptional case.
slacker
post Aug 17 2008, 05:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Superman7 @ Aug 17 2008, 11:52 AM)
Just a question. The one currently selling for RM3899 Macbookk C2D is running on Santa Rosa or Penyrnn?
*
Santa Rosa is using Penryn

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0492sec    0.53    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 12:32 PM