Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Upstream Peering Providers Graphs (Feb 2021), Breakdown For Each Major Malaysian ISP

views
     
heLL_bOy
post Apr 23 2021, 06:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: HEAVEN & HELL


base on my track previously NTT to EU normally is via Amsterdam when SEA-ME-WE 5 was not down during last year till Mid-Feb which the cable cut and during this period most of traffic was via Milan. When the restoration was done half of the traffic shifted back to Amsterdam.

Not sure now why now the traffic shifted to Vienna then only Amsterdam which also cause additional latency. hmm.gif
SUSCandy12
post Apr 23 2021, 06:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,878 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Apr 23 2021, 06:15 PM)
base on my track previously NTT to EU normally is via Amsterdam when SEA-ME-WE 5 was not down during last year till Mid-Feb which the cable cut and during this period most of traffic was via Milan. When the restoration was done half of the traffic shifted back to Amsterdam.

Not sure now why now the traffic shifted to Vienna then only Amsterdam which also cause additional latency. hmm.gif
*
The normal usual route which Maxis took to Europe last time was via TI's SEABONE route via Southern Italy into European destinations.

I'm starting to see that Maxis has now started utilizing their TATA routes (AS6453) to reach Belgium networks such as Proximus but they're not being prioritized thus the spike in latency during handover.

The packets already arrived in Belgium via Singapore using Tata's route in just about 171ms which is considered very good but upon handover to Proximus's network the packets experienced some 100ms delay due to not being prioritized as a peering partner of Maxis.

user posted image

Maxis has very little peering arrangements in European region particularly Benelux countries.

fadzlisyed99
post Jul 31 2021, 07:27 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
15 posts

Joined: May 2017
Hello Guys, sorry for interrupt your conversation. I have enquiry, currently I'm using Unifi Fibre 100mbps, I seeing Celcom Fibre offer 300mbps (competitive price)

Based on you guys expertise on ISP international routing, its that safe to take Celcom Fibre now? I have concern on latency and worry apps, gaming, etc my user might experincing delay.

Hope you guys dont mind to share. Thank you.
YoungMan
post Nov 20 2021, 10:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,839 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur



So much has been said about Maxis. How about Celcom and Digi?
QuantumEdge
post Nov 20 2021, 12:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,603 posts

Joined: Jan 2016


user posted image
Allo's, if anyone is lookihng for it
heLL_bOy
post Nov 20 2021, 01:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: HEAVEN & HELL


QUOTE(YoungMan @ Nov 20 2021, 10:52 AM)
So much has been said about Maxis. How about Celcom and Digi?
*
Digi/Umobile/Redtone is leasing majority ingress traffic from TM.

no different at all if you using TM.

only celcom / maxis is far different from them since they have their own transit provider and not leasing from TM at all.
YoungMan
post Nov 20 2021, 03:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,839 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Nov 20 2021, 02:00 PM)
Digi/Umobile/Redtone is leasing majority ingress traffic from TM.

no different at all if you using TM.

only celcom / maxis is far different from them since they have their own transit provider and not leasing from TM at all.
*
Ok noted.
Gregar Forte
post Nov 20 2021, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Bachok,Kelantan


What about TIME compared to unifi local and international?
heLL_bOy
post Nov 20 2021, 04:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: HEAVEN & HELL


QUOTE(Gregar Forte @ Nov 20 2021, 03:58 PM)
What about TIME compared to unifi local and international?
*
TIME still ok.. bad point if your source sending the ingress traffic to Singtel then back to TIME from Europe/US might having higher latency then the rest of upstream they have.

local as usual using MYIX or direct peering.

This post has been edited by heLL_bOy: Nov 20 2021, 04:26 PM
Gregar Forte
post Nov 20 2021, 07:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
238 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Bachok,Kelantan


QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Nov 20 2021, 04:25 PM)
TIME still ok.. bad point if your source sending the ingress traffic to Singtel then back to TIME from Europe/US might having higher latency then the rest of upstream they have.

local as usual using MYIX or direct peering.
*
Thats great. At least better than unifi
sharpman
post Sep 1 2022, 10:46 PM

Veteran LYN Forumer
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



any more updates on Upstream Peering Providers?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0186sec    1.80    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:28 PM