did i do something wrong (right??)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644112
Attached thumbnail(s)
** WPrime - CPU Multithread Benchmarking **, LowYat.NET WPrime Hall of Fame V1
|
|
 Sep 7 2007, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach  
|
how come my setup can beat NightRaven's...
did i do something wrong (right??) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644112 Attached thumbnail(s)
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2007, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(intune @ Sep 7 2007, 09:28 PM) anyone dares the 1024M? will post shortly...  ran it just now, but before i got the chance to validate, my daughter came in and wanna play games  |
|
|
Sep 8 2007, 06:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(NightRaven @ Sep 8 2007, 04:21 AM) haha your rams and timings bro no wonder la...was quite surprise to see the how come 3.8 can be faster than 4g... i was running loose timings and all. i ran once only with no tweaks did the 1024 test, but got problem validating. will try it again. |
|
|
Sep 8 2007, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 8 2007, 09:57 PM) remysix,what is ur timing and speed for ur ram? it ran at 1:1 with the proc, so 424Mhz with 4-4-4-10 2Tgot another 32M test with 4Ghz...it's 10sec something...but 1023M, failed.  still having problem with my Q6600 G0 temp...tot dah ok, but seems not. |
|
|
Sep 9 2007, 08:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 8 2007, 10:12 PM) so u mean ur ram is only 850MHz with CL4? yup...i only ran the ram at 850 with CL4 for the test.what is the vdimm u using? vdimm...2.25v... |
|
|
Sep 9 2007, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(gregy @ Sep 9 2007, 05:04 PM) Your pic showed 3.85 GHz, not 3.825 from what i can see, the wPrime is more intro CPU stressing rather than the ram...got the cpu and ram utilisation on the sidebar. from that, i can see that when i fired up the apps, the cpu utilization was being max to 100% but the ram utilization barely move.Anyway it seems that this test scales with no. of cores and proc speed more than anything, like just now I managed 11.843s for 32M running at 3.87GHz. I was also monitoring my ram temp, usually for Prime95 or Memtest the ram temps hit about 40 degrees C, but for WPrime the rams hardly broke a sweat It looks like this test also favours Xeons, the best worldwide scores are nearly twice as fast as anything we have here so far  Too bad the hbot server is down so my new scores cannot be validated yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 10 2007, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 10 2007, 03:55 PM)  the website is dow,cannot log in make me cannot validate my result  maybe the side down due too many requests from users... |
|
|
Sep 10 2007, 07:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 10 2007, 07:27 PM)  (now turn to yellow)i like the emotion icon so much,they look so cute. anyway,have u tried to log into the website? (this wprime not many ppl playing.) anyway, just logged on to the site, no problemo!  |
|
|
Sep 10 2007, 09:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(intune @ Sep 10 2007, 07:59 PM) Faster faster guys post your link..i guess competition heating up!!.. i myself trying to best my 32M at 3.8GHz..but errors!!!! unstable.. i've already got a new one at 4Ghz for 32M but so not stable on 1024M testing... here it is: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644131 Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 07:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
ran the 1024M test...submitted the result. WTF, i got some error saying that the checksum is invalid. need to use the new wPrime version which is i'm currently using. dun really understand what's the problem.
running the proc at 3825Mhz...got 5 min 46sec 227 msec check out the screenie. any idea why i got the error message? 
*******UPDATED******** ok already. forgot to log-in first before submit the score. here's the link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645257 the screenie: 
This post has been edited by remysix: Sep 11 2007, 07:40 AM |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 05:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 11 2007, 05:02 PM) i can say that the P35-DQ6 is faster than my mobo a bit,cause i tried having excatly the same setting at remysix but cant get the speed of his mobo aiseh bro...cannot be like that la...how come u wanna change mobo just because of a single benchie application results. unless i can beat all of your mobo results for all common benchie applicationS, then ok la. just one not-so-popular apps maa... it's time to change mobo liao  anyway,i have exam this two week,next week only i will come here and beat u all  |
|
|
Sep 14 2007, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Sep 14 2007, 02:11 PM) ya,cause my proc is too hot,i using n00b air cooler only,remember,hot processor with cooler processor,the hot proc can perform much slower. lolz...u called xigmatek s1283 a n00b air cooler ka...it's a high end air cooler with low end price what... |
|
|
Sep 15 2007, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(intune @ Sep 15 2007, 07:18 PM) Enuff talk.. lets see some new benchmarks guys!! especially the 1024M ..let see some stability testing! wish i could do the 1024 test at 4ghz but i need to fix my WC loop before can venture into that test... come on people, show ur result here |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(intune @ Sep 15 2007, 09:41 PM) Dang! atleast u got WC.. my NB chip or Rams cant take 4GHz well, it wont be long now but will try to do some mobo mod soon..to up Vdimm..Anyone can borrow me a Digitalmultimeter? u already on ur way to get the swiftech compact H20 rite... |
|
|
Sep 21 2007, 07:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(NightRaven @ Sep 21 2007, 01:12 AM) hey guys update my score nice one bro...need to get the extreme version as well to top that i guess1024m = 5m 34s 520ms QX6700 4.29Ghz http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648643 32m = 10s 20ms QX6700 4.29ghz http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648646 Added on September 21, 2007, 1:13 ammy rams are bloody hopeless man. i need to pump cpu so much higher to cover up |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0169sec
 0.52
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 06:11 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.