Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Which Abalone Origin Is The Best?, Australia, Chile, Mexico or S.Africa?

views
     
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 12:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Japan, look up Yoshihama or Oami abalone.
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 12:34 AM)
Many Chinese medicinal shops who stocks canned abalones recommended Mexican/Chilean ones instead.

Japan ones they claim are not not as good as before-radiation contamination
South African ones come from mixed cold/warm waters, seafood industry not as developed.
*
Best abalone came from Iwate, that is hundreds miles away from Fukushima.

This post has been edited by Angelic Layer: Feb 11 2021, 01:05 AM
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 01:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 01:09 AM)
Do you know that the Japanese quietly pour radiation contaminated waste water into their seas?

Never watch the NHK documentary that oyster population in Japanese waters are declining today close to extinction?
*
No way they can ship thousands of tonnes of water elsewhere to dump without anyone notice.
Do you know their actual volume of tritium water?
You read other people say only, never read the real source.

The Oyster problem is water temperature related, not related to tritium.
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 01:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 01:52 AM)
No one really knows they can just dump it into the rivers right those waste waters which is used to cool down the uranium rods. It has to land up somewhere right?
*
You talk about something you didn't know and pretend like you know.

user posted image
They have a large processing plant on site, each day waste water is many times larger than your house.
There is no river within the vicinity, only way to dump is on site.
You think like your 10 tonne, 20 tonne lorry can carry to dump like your Selangor river?
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 02:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 02:05 AM)
It's not like you can just filter out the nuclear particles out from the water like that so easily.

Every country out there also knows they're secretly dumping the water into the sea. Ask any regular Japanese they'd also be shy to ignore answering your question than to lie about it.
*
You are showing your ignorance again, the only thing they cannot filter out is tritium, which in itself have weak radiation.
Half life is only 12 years compared to uranium or plutonium.
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 02:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 02:27 AM)
Look at those water tanks? Do you think the contaminated water will be stored in them forever? Logic will tell you that it'll eventually have to be offloaded somewhere right? The Japanese government has been quietly pouring them away behind public knowledge. Where do you think it went? Over the past few years ever since the tsunami, they've been draining it gradually. Where do you think is the best place to pour the water into?
*
They already said they flush it on site.
And you are saying in the beginning of this argument they are shipping hundred of miles to Iwate to dump at abalone isn't it.
The didn't even make it a secret that they are dumping it after evaporation plan is not feasible.
Don't throw in oyster farm and everything else, cause not likely they will ship the water across prefecture to dump without anyone knowing or even make sense on the very least.
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 02:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 02:44 AM)
Did you see the beach just metres away from where they stored the contaminated water? The sea ain't still ya know. The entire Pacific Ocean which the east side of Japan and surrounding sea of Japan will carry the nuclear particles everywhere through water movements even through rivers which connect back to the seas.
*
You are wasting my time with your ignorance.
What nuclear particle? Uranium? Plutonium?
Only Tritium is left, and level is safe.
You keep on saying how do you know, people measure and test already, even by non governmental people on site, don't believe can still travel there.
I have a photographer friend who just visited before Corona.
SUSAngelic Layer
post Feb 11 2021, 04:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Feb 11 2021, 04:25 PM)
This was just release some 3 months back in Fukushima. Korean fishermen/fish farmers are begging Japan NOT to release them into the sea as their fishery businesses will be greatly affected further with the ongoing COVID pandemic. China government is also issuing press statements addressing the concerns.



Fukushima Water Release Could Change Human DNA, Greenpeace Warns
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/24/asia/jap...scli/index.html
*
No way, they are releasing it facing the pacific, Korea is on the opposite site of the island, nothing affects them at all.
« Next Oldest · Kopitiam · Next Newest »
 

Add ReplyOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0195sec    0.18    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 01:42 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.