QUOTE(-kytz- @ Jul 19 2023, 12:18 AM)
ILP has a fee waiver as a rider, in case the insured has TPD, future premiums will be totally covered by the insurance company. This is the reason why I am going for ILP and another reason is that there is an overseas hospitalisation rider. Standalone do not provide such add-ons.
But I'm also interested to hear your thoughts on ILP vs Standalone?
The fee waiver is useless. It only cover the basic CI and TPD. If you have TPD, you are basically vegetable. Again thanks to my agent for pointing it out. Her client had stage 2 cancer or something like that, because of waiver only cover the basic 36 illness, the client didn't fulfilled the waiver condition and forced to continue payin for it. Yeah I was tempted by it too when I heard about it. Only one agent had taken the time to tell me about the waiver. The other agents were like oh if you have xyz disease, they will automatically waive you (not true, as mentioned you need to fulfilled the waiver definition and condition).
You can designed your own CI plan which is better than what is included in ILP. I know as I have looked into it. I recommend moneyowl from Singapore. They offer better plans for CI than what Malaysia side offer. Downside is you need to travel down and sign all the documents there and it's priced in SGD. I have not look into life or TPD so cannot share my knowledge on that. Moneyowl is not commission based and they are able to offer you multiple insurance from different providers. You also don't need to pay them for consultation. I consulted with them via Microsoft teams for 2h+ and was satisfied with the plan they came out for me. (50% Cheaper than what Malaysia have to offer for same protection with multipayment, their premium is fixed and you got option to grab life, TPD and CI). Dont take my word for it. Kindly compare with what Malaysia side have to offer and you will see it for yourself.
I favour standalone for the following reasons:
1. Pure insurance. Never ever mix investment with insurance.
2. ILP return sucks. Well majority. Take your time and look though all the investment. You will be surprised they cannot even beat EPF returns over say 10 years. Yes there are few rare cases but as mentioned again basically lousy returns. So basically you are paying extra for lousy returns when you can put the savings into EPF and then use part of it to pay for the insurance in the future and get more than what the ILP can give you. Does that sound like value for money for you? It doesn't sound like value for money to me.
If you are even braver, rather than dump into EPF, if you dump it into QQQ or CSPX, you will get more than EPF returns. (that's what I am doing I am getting min 10%p.a Vs what they can give me)
3. You are paying extra. All the ILP have ongoing fund fees of around 1.5-1.8%p.a (unit trust annual management fees). Over long time, the 1.5-1.8%p.a add up. That's why I advocate for ETF where the fees are only 0.05%-0.1%p.a
4. You are paying extra for life, tpd and CI when you only want the medical portion (if you are like me).
5. With ILP you are forced to topup somewhere down the road or agree to pay higher premium or else your insurance duration will decrease say from 80 years old to only 70 years old (just an example). They can ask you to topup as soon as say 6 months of purchase. How much and how frequent to topup depend on
1. Condition of the market.
2. Fund performance
3. How much money is left in the insurance pool
Yes standalone medical insurance also increase in price. But based off me asking several agents from different companies, all told me the same thing. Usually they follow the projected rates in the table/contract. Rarely they deviate from it unless something really bad happen. So you will know more or less how much you are paying.
Topup is guaranteed for ILP. down the road. It's just a question of when they will ask you to topup. There's no topup for standalone unless they increase the premium above what's projected.
Pros of ILP
1. Premium holiday -unless you are horrible pay master, this is useful to you. Or if you need to stop paying for some unknown reason, you can take a short break. Also if you forget to pay, your insurance won't lapse unlike standalone.
2. You can move between ranks of your medical insurance easily. If you need to downgrade down the road. Of course if you are already on the lowest rank of the plan, you cannot move down anymore.
contestchris is an ILP holder. Here is what he shared about ILP.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE(contestchris @ May 18 2023, 09:30 PM)
Look, the thing people fail to understand about ILPs is:
1)
You pay more premiums in your younger years, the idea being these excess premiums will grow exponentially and cover the significantly higher insurance costs on the later years of your life. This is the "trick" they use to tell you that you will pay "level premiums for life" until the end of coverage.
2) The "level premiums for life" is actually a
lie. Every 3-5 years, insurance companies will reprice their plans/riders due to medical inflation / incorrect pricing assumptions, and consequently as this pushes the insurance costs higher, the premiums you were originally projected to pay will no longer be enough to sustain until the end of coverage. In this situation, you will either need to start paying more premiums or reduce coverage / cut riders. My GE ILP was re-priced 5 years after purchase, the insurance costs for the medical plan riders went up by 20%. I am aware of some insurance companies even repricing by 70%!
3) ILP funds are off the balance sheet of insurance companies. Unlike traditional participating policies (i.e. par fund) where insurance companies share the investment profits with policyholders, or pure protection policies (i.e. non-par fund) where insurance companies keep all the investment profits, or the shareholders fund where obviously all investment profits are retained by the insurance companies.This means that there is a likelihood that insurance companies may prioritize and put more focus on the management of the par/non-par/shareholders funds, as these will directly impact their profits. As such, the management of the ILP funds may become an afterthought, as there is no profit-sharing element with the insurance company.
4) Insurance companies focus by and large is on providing insurance coverage. For investments, it is best to go directly to unit trust companies (if you really must), as that is their bread and butter. You can compare the returns of unit trust funds to ILP funds. There is also another peculiar distinction - though both are the exact same functionally, unit trust funds are governed by SC while ILPs are governed by Bank Negara.
5) The damage to ILPs are done in the first few years, where your allocated premiums are 60% for first 3 years, 80% for the following 3, and 95% for year 7 and 8 (it used to be worse before, now BNM improved things a bit). From Year 9 onwards, 100% allocation rate to your ILP funds. In the first few years, the agents and insurance company are laughing to the bank.
Hope this help.
This post has been edited by Ramjade: Jul 19 2023, 01:37 AM