Anyone know a good brand or reliable CAT 5e cable for 100mbps above ?
Just curious CAT 5e is enough for 300mbps ?

Hi guys, is it ok i ask this here or somewhere else might be better?
Lately been having this problem where the modem light everything is ok but there is no internet?
Even on my devices there is the wifi signal is on but no internet, i think the message say cant get ip address or something like that?
Have to restart the router and the modem than thing will be ok. Never had this problem for years but happened a few times inside this week. Any idea is there anything i can do to solve this problem??

so it is not hardware problem but the problem is on tm side?
But seem like just 2 of us having this problem from the lack of replies i got?

Before that ask TM why their pricing is higher than other ISP? Ask them why they bundle unifiTV eventhough not everyone using it can???

1. Tying practices
While the term tie or tying is often referred to as separate practices,
their true significance is the connection of some business practice to some
coercive act.22 This has been consistently stated in the U.S. cases that

originally created and defined the terms.23 Tying is often defined as a seller
conditioning the sale of a product or service on the purchase of a second
product or service (as opposed to bundling which is generally defined the
sale of two or more products or services sold in fixed proportions), while in
"tie-in" sales consumers are compelled under contract to purchase all future
tied products from the tying firm.24 This is also a common feature of
Community law.25 In the E.U., the use of the terms tie and tying had, up
until the CFI Judgment, generally been used to signify the ultimate legal
conclusion.26 In the U.S., there was great initial hostility to such contracts
when tying was first analyzed from an antitrust perspective. As Justice
Frankfurter at the time wrote "[t]ying agreements serve hardly any purpose
beyond the suppression of competition."27
The terms tying or "tie" however have meanings in both contractual
and in economics contexts.28 Legal analyses of tying arose out of
examinations of contractual provisions that courts concluded coerced

purchasers and licensees into accepting unwanted goods and services or
into refusing to obtain them elsewhere.2 9 Indeed the test used in Jefferson
Parish was specifically aimed at determining whether a contract, as
opposed to a practice, had tying effects.



2. Bundling practices
Bundling is closely related to tying but is not identical to it. However
it has been analogized to tying and tests designed to analyze tying are
applied to bundling.30 Tests applied to contractual tying may have different
results when applied to bundling practices." Some bundling practices as
generally understood are listed below along with the subdivisions of each
practice defined in a variety of contexts. Bundling has been termed,
"abusive,"3 2 "mixed," "pure,"34 "discriminatory," "technical," 6
"price,"3 "product," "predatory,"39 "collective,"40 "physical,"4 1


"services," 4 2 "two-good,"43 "multiple product,"" and "commodity."4 5 To
name a few not-always-consistently applied sub-definitions. The CFI has
previously identified three separate bundling practices, "mixed bundling",
"pure bundling," and "technical bundling" 46 and evaluated them using
different criteria to determine whether or not the merged entity would have
incentive to engage in them.47 The applicant in GE argued that a distinction
had to be drawn between different bundling practices and their different
potentials for anticompetitive effects. The CFI clearly agreed that they
were different business practices, each with their own market pressures
when it separately evaluated the likelihood of their occurring in the
proposed merger." While GE did not reach the merits of the Commission's
competitive foreclosure arguments,49 it nonetheless evaluated the different
forms of bundling in terms of the economic and competitive criteria
necessary to demonstrate rationales for the merged entity to use them.
The presence of factors such as an exclusive IPR in one good or
service, or other restrictions on a customer's ability to procure the goods
separately, or pricing either above or below average variable cost, or
restrictions to competition or entry, are areas where most competition
questions have arisen.