They can actually.

But question is why oh? People complain? They wont come and disturb right? Like so many houses does that..

Tabuli ini machiem aunty..

Likely neighbors complained. I can't see if the structure is infringing on the neighbors.

Awning is a temporary structure and usually the bandaraya won't go after these. This is strange.

maybe the some1 butt hurt with auntie or her family, so make problem for her. little bit of duit kopi enough

THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN MEETS THE EYE TO USJ5 AWNING ISSUE

SINCE yesterday, residents have been sharing videos of the dismantling of an awning at a house in USJ5. The videos which were recorded and broadcast by a political NGO have gone viral, causing tongues to wag and fingers pointing in all directions.

Without jumping to any conclusions and while waiting for the Subang Jaya City Council Mayor Noraini Roslan to issue a statement, we spoke to MBSJ councillor for Zone 4 Kamarul Hisham who happens to be the councillor in charge of USJ1-6 and is also an architect.

According to Kamarul, the owner of the house had lost her appeal to MBSJ for her awning which had been a thorn in the flesh between her and her neighbour since the end of 2019.

"This dispute was recorded by MPSJ on Dec 30 2019. The neighbour who raised the complaint said that the awning which was recently constructed then had caused rainwater to spill over to their property."

"On Jan 8 2020, MBSJ had issued a notice to the awning owner to dismantle it. A compound notice was issued on Feb 28 2020 when the house owner did not comply."

"On July 2020, the awning owner had a meeting with MPSJ deputy president. On October 2020, a notice was issued to dismantle the awning," he said to SJEcho.

Kamarul said the awning owner had filed several appeals to give her more time to seek approval or dismantle the 5 feet x 8 feet structure.

"The first appeal for extension was from Nov 3 to Dec 3 2020. A second appeal to further extend it to Dec 31 2020 was rejected. When she met the Mayor, she was given the last extension to Dec 21 2020."

"The enforcement team with the presence of the police went in on Dec 22 2020 to dismantle the awning in dispute," he said.

According to Kamarul the awning owner appealed on the basis that she would get an architect to draw up plans for submission to carry out renovations to her porch which will include the awning but had failed to submit to MBSJ before the deadline.

"I had earlier shared the case and chronology of the case with the person who posted the viral video, Andy Ling who claims to be from Gerakan."

"But he never did acknowledge receipt of the information and proceeded to highlight a distorted perspective of the enforcement action by MBSJ," Kamarul said.

According to Kamarul, in light of this controversy, MBSJ may initiate a study on all awning extensions in Subang Jaya, especially those built without approval from MBSJ.

They purposely post wrong info.Her awning is lower than the neighbuor’s awning and raining water pouring in so they told her to rectify but she ignore it. The neighbuor sued her and won the case, the court summoned her to remove it twice, she ignore it , so the mpsj have to go in to dismantle only one side of the awning.

Because of this kind of stupid So-high people, all the awnings without application for MBSJ are in risk.

read here for the true story...100% aunty fault
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=5076377&hl=



This post has been edited by Zaire.Ver: Dec 23 2020, 10:46 AM

Ahh... No wonder...

Local council simply won't "do extra work" like this. Lazy bums ass fellows.... This is last solution... No more else can be done. The owner is damn stubborn...

Warning Letter was already sent .
but the owner ignore it.

to build this may need council permission . this include signed OK from your neighbour s in the application .
already break the law.



This post has been edited by Momo33: Dec 23 2020, 11:43 AM

Honestly, I am impressed by the council to enforce the court's decision. Especially considering the timeline from the first filing of the complain till enforcement.
Just two cents as a European, this case would have dragged for years to come through the court in my home country.

actually the main issues is the damage done to neighbor house... that's the point..
no permit or approvals from MBSJ is small matter only... many done that previously... all okay. all happy endings...
just that this person pissed the neighbor & cause damage... so report done & court case...

if no damage... the awning would still be there... No complaints... everyone happy...

I already suspected likely this was due to neighbor’s complaints when I first saw this post. There are many selfish idiotic house owners in Malaysia whether you are owning a 200k or 2mil+ house.

Even in gated and guarded community there are house owners building illegal or inconsiderate structures infringing other properties.

For this woman all I can say is she deserved this. TS should be more careful posting video without understanding all the facts. This is highly irresponsible

This post has been edited by blancpain4470: Dec 23 2020, 02:00 PM

So they viral they kena balik? Lol. Based on the comments there then really need to remove. My first impression was the awning was lower than neighbour house, hence why maybe neighbour complaint cause water splash in. So it is true then based on the comments. Sigh.

Saw many brainless cina people comments on fb, haiz

what to do..

the country like this...

stereotypes all the ways..

but some smart one could see it's not race issues...

it's cause losses to neighbor...

like I said.. many have done illegal renovation without causing damage/loss to neighbor... No issues.. No problems.. No MBSJ / whatever Majilis bandaran comes disturb/demolish/fine....

Nice waterfall