Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Chat This Famous Youtuber use my art without permission, now his fanbase harassing me
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:14 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ReoAyanami @ Sep 21 2020, 02:29 AM) It doesn't matter if it is copyrighted by TS or not since the courts have no power to force YouTube remove his strike. So, on what grounds is he even suing TS? What does he even get from suing TS? Is he going to spend 15k to get nothing but only to harrass TS? Exactly. He needs to sue Youtube first. Most useless threat I ever heard of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(herpaderp @ Sep 21 2020, 02:37 PM) now report the youtuber for harassment ez This. All k go and report his angry rant video for harassment/abusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(empyreal @ Sep 21 2020, 03:38 PM) youre using an actual term according to your own definitions. just because it involves legal elements doesnt mean that its a legal action. everything we do everyday has legal elements. by that logic, if i complained that my frappe is a bit warm, youre saying that ive just initiated a legal action against starbucks for infringing on their contractual obligation. no. Actually it is a legal action. It is under their DMCA law. As long as TS owns the artwork, he shouldn't be afraid. I did abit of research and realize the youtuber can sue TS for false claim, which is illegal under their DMCA law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:46 PM
|
|
QUOTE(badkid @ Sep 21 2020, 03:44 PM) Just let the copyright claim sit in TS. Let his channel suffer until the end of the claim time. Do not bother to respond to him as US law has no jurisdiction in Msia Hopefully someone else found other copy right breach by his team and do 2 more strikes. Teach him and his editor and his thumbnail maker a lesson for simply lifting things of the net and put in in own video and profit from it. This. Just sit it out. He can't even pinpoint who to sue. When he realise it is from someone outside USA, he will give up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Sep 21 2020, 03:50 PM) Huh? Who is suing who? I thought it's the arsehole trying to sue TS for fake copyright? TS is initiating a copyright claim under the DMCA law. He can choose to press the claim by going to court, which is the next step, but TS is not doing this, he is hoping to settle it pescefully. But dumb youtuber insist that TS is making false claim, which is a crime under their DMCA law. So youtuber is desperate now because he got 2 copyright strike, he wants to take TS to court to clear the claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 03:52 PM) Then TS is effectively a false copyright claimet abusing copyright claim. Nice. Actually no, he is a claimant. If he sits it out, he is still a claimant. Onus now is on youtuber to prove TS is making false claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 03:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 03:56 PM) Except DMCA does not apply in this case. This id a straight copyright claim, nothing related to DMCA. It is part of the DMCA mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 04:03 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 03:59 PM) Except it is a false copyright claim as the use of the art is covered under fair use. TS can request his art to not be use and TheQuartering can take it down as courtesy but TS cannot copyright claim the video just because of a fan art, which is also under fair use, is shown for 4 seconds. You are right. It is actually a fan art, TS can't sell rights to it. But not sure whether youtuber can still use it legally
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 04:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 04:00 PM) That is not how it works, TS claim, Youtuber dispute, TS needs to take the next step by either release the claim or proceed to court case. After 90 days the claim dissapears. TS doesn't have to enforce it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 04:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 04:03 PM) It's not, go read what the DMCA is for, a simple wikipedia page will tell you it is not. You should do more research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar Calendar
|
Sep 21 2020, 04:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nakal_mode @ Sep 21 2020, 04:04 PM) Because the monetization comes from the video and commentary and criticism, not 4 secs of TS art. Doesn't matter if it is commentary or criticism, or which part of the video make the money. You use you have to pay.
|
|
|
|
|