If you watched the video, you would know a keyword was mentioned.

kesian that pedo lol
next time want b pedo, b like PAS

Ayam prawnhub and hentai journeys are all free... so ayam safe or not?

.
Non-P2P prawn sites should be safe, .......

Note that it is also against Malaysian Law for a person to be in possession of adultporn files/media, eg on their computers or phones but the police are usually not too strict about this if they are only for personal viewing.
.

.
Be careful of straightaway believing things on the Internet, eg unnecessary FUD in this case. We need to confirm such doubtful or far-fetched news with 2 or 3 other reliable sources.

In the court of law, you need very convincing proofs or evidence to convict the suspect or suspicious criminal of guilt, not just mere allegations, hearsay or rumours. Any such evidence about the CIA/FBI's involvement in prawnhub.?

Eg Is it safe or not safe to feed your pet-dogs/cats raw meat.? There are Internet articles stating it is safe and beneficial to do so. This is very likely not true. Is it safe for us to eat raw meat daily.?
.

Nearly 100 million people watch porn daily. Porn is one of the most searched keyword on Google, Bing and other search engines. While Google, Facebook and other ‘normal’ websites track you, it would be naive on your part to assume that the popular porn websites like Prawnhub and  X-video don’t track you.

Yes, they track you and they meticulously compile that data to show you specific ads. It is also rumoured that some of them sell data to the highest bidder as dirty data is often the most coveted data.

Visitors to porn sites have a “fundamentally misleading sense of privacy,” warn the authors of a new study that examines how tracking software made by tech companies like Google and Facebook is deployed on adult websites.

The authors of the study analyzed 22,484 porn sites and found that 93 percent of them leak data to third parties, including when accessed via a browser’s “incognito” mode. This data presents a “unique and elevated risk,” warn the authors, as 45 percent of porn site URLs indicate the nature of the content, potentially revealing someone’s sexual preferences.

“[E]veryone is at risk when such data is accessible without users’ consent, and thus can potentially be leveraged against them,” write the authors. “These risks are heightened for vulnerable populations whose porn usage might be classified as non-normative or contrary to their public life.” This might include countries where homosexuality is illegal, for example, or instances when a public figure’s sexuality is not public knowledge.

But while it’s clear that people are being tracked when visiting porn sites, it’s less certain what happens to this data, and in what cases it can be linked to someone’s identity.

Trackers made by Google and its subsidiaries, for example, appeared on 74 percent of the porn sites the researchers examined. But the company denies its software is collecting information that is used to build advertising profiles.

.
Tracking of porn-site visitors is mainly for Google to serve targeted ads = the porn-sites can earn ad revenue from Google depending on the numbef of daily visitors. Some porn-sites charge monthly subscriptions for normal access or for premiym access, like Netflix. This is part of business in the online world.
....... By your logic, the FBI/CIA/NSA should also be involved in Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp, etc. ????

The FBI/CIA/NSA are mostly interested in major criminals like Muslim terrorists, pedophiles, drug traffickers, human traffickers, etc, not in porn-site visitors. The 3-letter agencies have their own methods for detecting and spying/tracking of such people, usually with zero-day exploits, hidden backdoors, secret FISA court orders served on tech companies/ISPs, etc.
.

Since 1997 when pornography began migrating to the Internet, it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of who’s viewing how much of what when. Journalists, academics, government agencies, anti-porn groups, and the porn industry have all released traffic estimates that often disagree.

Who should we believe? Hard to say. All we can do is keep open minds and use our best judgment.

Recently, some intriguing new information came to light. The world’s most popular porn site, PornHub, published a trove of site statistics for 2017. This information can’t be independently fact-checked, so we shouldn’t take it as gospel. But to my knowledge, PornHub is the only major player in the online porn industry to release such data.

Alexa, the leading Web-traffic tracker, says that among the world’s tens of millions of sites, PornHub ranks number 36. But if we eliminate search engines (Google U.S. and its many country-specific affiliates), Web portals (Yahoo!), shopping sites (Amazon), and sites based on user-generated content (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit), if we focus only on sites that publish other content, then PornHub ranks number four behind only Wikipedia, Microsoft, and Netflix.

Meanwhile, among the planet’s top 100 sites, Alexa says that four others are also devoted to porn: XVideos (#39, based in France), BongaCams (#48, Russia), xHamster (#76, U.S.), and xnxx (#91, France). Together PornHub and these four account for more than 6 billion visits per month, nearly one a month for every person on Earth.

A spokesperson replied that the site relies on Google Analytics, a service of the giant search company that parses web traffic a zillion different ways. I use Google Analytics myself for the site I publish, GreatSexGuidance. The depth and breadth of information are astonishing — and I use only the services available for free.
Sites that pay get much, much more.

Sitting on the wire, the NSA has the ability to track and make a record of every website you visit.  Today, the Huffington Post revealed that the NSA is using this incredible power to track who visits online porn websites, and to use this information to discredit those it deems dangerous. Their porn habits would then be "exploited to undermine a target's credibility, reputation and authority."

The story was illustrated with six individuals, none of whom are designated terrorists themselves. Instead, they are deemed "radicalizers," people—two of which the NSA itself characterized as a "well-known media celebrity" and a "respected academic"—whose speeches and postings allegedly incite hatred or promote offensive jihad.

The report raises the specter of abusing online viewing records to discredit other political opponents of the US government. The NSA document was reviewed not just by the NSA and counter-terrorism officials, but by entities like the Department of Commerce and the US Trade Representative. The USTR negotiates treaties (like the controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership), and one could certainly imagine that the leverage from this program could be useful in pushing for the US position. In fact, EFF and three dozen civil society groups have already asked the NSA to explain if they are spying on those advocating for the public interest in US trade policy.

waiting for big fish

.
Muslim preachers who make hate-speech to incite Muslim terrorists are also caught in the NSA's net for targeted spying = the NSA may find the hate-speech preachers visiting porn-sites which would present the opportunity for the NSA to publicly out and shame the hypocrite Muslim preachers = their hate-speech become less effective in incitement.

It is not the hypocritical Muslim preachers' porn-site visits that attracted the NSA's attention, but their hate-speech to incite Muslim terrorists.

Similarly, after being arrested by the police for having childporn, hypocritical alim-menj's activism in Islamic issues has become less effective or influential among the Muslims and the public.
.