Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Liability poser when handing over car to mechanic

views
     
SUSDrifter
post Aug 10 2007, 09:43 AM, updated 19y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


i dun really understd, does this mean if they(mech, car jockey, etc) clearly show me, they are off the liability?



Liability poser when handing over car to mechanic, jockey

By SHAILA KOSHY

KUALA LUMPUR: If you hand over your car keys to the mechanic, service centre, car wash or hotel car jockey, do not assume you can make a claim in the event of theft and damage.

A disclaimer clause that is clearly visible and not hidden in fine print could absolve them of any liability.

However, you could sue for negligence if the disclaimer was not clearly visible and not brought to your attention before you handed over the car, said lawyers yesterday.

"The moment you give your car to the mechanic, he becomes the bailee and cannot take it for a joyride," said Mah Weng Kwai.

"The same applies for valet parking at hotels," added Ragunath Kesavan.

"Good hotels often have a disclaimer clause but for it to be effective, if it is not clearly visible, it must be brought to the notice of the guest before the car is handed over."

"If that is done, the disclaimer becomes a good waiver of liability," said Mah.

They said this yesterday when asked about liability for damage and loss in the accident along Jalan Tun Razak involving a Porsche that a workshop foreman had taken for a joyride and crashed, killing one of the friends he had taken along, in the 12.30am incident on Wednesday.

Amer Hamzah Arshad said that having insurance did not preclude a car owner from suing a workshop or hotel for negligence.

Apart from the fact that most vehicle insurance policies have an excess clause, Mah said an owner who did not want to lose his/her no-claim bonus might decide it was better to sue.

"However, the quantum that you can get will be apportioned to prevent double compensation," said Amer.

Asked whether car owners had an obligation to ask their mechanics or hotel staff whether there was a disclaimer clause if they did not see one, Mah said, "No, you must tell me. It is not reasonable for me to ask.

"The moment a car is given to a workshop, the principle of bailment applies and they must take care."

In February 2004, it was reported that a hotel here had agreed to pay for repairs to a guest's car that had been broken into while it was parked in its car park.

The car doors were smashed and locks damaged, and the guest's golf bag and clothes, worth RM1,500, were stolen.

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...5886&sec=nation
goliath
post Aug 10 2007, 09:52 AM

* * * * * * *
*******
Senior Member
5,532 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Drifter @ Aug 10 2007, 09:43 AM)
i dun really understd, does this mean if they(mech, car jockey, etc) clearly show me, they are off the liability?
*
Something like 'park at your own risk'
tester1979
post Aug 10 2007, 10:47 AM

*** O.M.G ***
******
Senior Member
1,317 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Cheras, KL


that is right.....but got limit la....showing the clause to you means that if anything happens while your car is in their premisis excludes then from liability but that does not include them taking your car for joyride or misuse your car........valet parking means parking the car for you. not taking the car to go mamak with friends......same as workshop.......they are still liable if they take your car for a ride other than the purpose of determining the problem with your car of checking to see if there is still other problem after they fix it........

best is.....stay with your car.......
SUSDrifter
post Aug 10 2007, 11:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(tester1979 @ Aug 10 2007, 10:47 AM)
that is right.....but got limit la....showing the clause to you means that if anything happens while your car is in their premisis excludes then from liability but that does not include them taking your car for joyride or misuse your car........valet parking means parking the car for you.  not taking the car to go mamak with friends......same as workshop.......they are still liable if they take your car for a ride other than the purpose of determining the problem with your car of checking to see if there is still other problem after they fix it........

best is.....stay with your car.......
*
ok, mean if normal things can exclude liability

if go joyride, etc, can sue them, rt
Gouki
post Aug 10 2007, 11:30 AM

Live Life Cool
Group Icon
Elite
6,659 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL/PJ/USJ/Puchong/KKB, Sel.



Not really though, in the article TS posted oso says that if they didnt show signs like "park at your own risk" or etc to you before you hand the car to them, its still their liability. Moreover, in the agreement act, once they collect parking fees from you when you park your car in a parking premisis, a mutual agreement occur that they are liable unless the parking is free. Just look at the Canny Ong case, the parking company is liable for the case too even they have a big "park at ur own risk" sign upon the parking entrance. smile.gif
SUSDrifter
post Aug 10 2007, 12:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(Gouki @ Aug 10 2007, 11:30 AM)
Not really though, in the article TS posted oso says that if they didnt show signs like "park at your own risk" or etc to you before you hand the car to them, its still their liability. Moreover, in the agreement act, once they collect parking fees from you when you park your car in a parking premisis, a mutual agreement occur that they are liable unless the parking is free. Just look at the Canny Ong case, the parking company is liable for the case too even they have a big "park at ur own risk" sign upon the parking entrance. smile.gif
*
liable for canny ong? wat is the out come?
DaIdiot
post Aug 10 2007, 12:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,028 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: KL



this is really interesting though, since in the article it states that you cannot make a claim if they show you the clause etc, before you hand over the keys.

So does that mean those unethical workshops can conveniently "lose" your car and still not have to pay for damages? hmm.gif
tysern
post Aug 10 2007, 01:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


My friend has had this experience. He sent his SEI Perdana to the workshop for servicing. What the mechanic told him was, when they took the car out for a test run, the car skidded and crashed into a divider. The damage was bad, but it could still be repaired.

The mechanic apologized and repaired the car for free, which after my friend sold off the car. Everything was settled nicely, and its all good now.

At least, the mechanic is responsible for his damages.
SUSDrifter
post Aug 10 2007, 03:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE
isclaimers are contractual in nature. And are valid , contractually.

but if there is negligence (a tort) , then its actionable , entirely separate from any contractual issues.

hence , the usual "Park At Your Own Risk" is valid , contractually. Ie , you're at liberty to read the sign , and decide NOT to park there. Its your choice. If you , nonetheless , park , don't b**** about how unfair the sign is.

but , if you parked at , say , Concord. It rained. And you car drowned. Contractually , the hotel may indeed refer to the sign that says "Park at your own risk" and "Flood Zone" , and claim that they're not liable. But if you're able to prove that there was negligence (eg , prior knowledge of predisposition to flooding , failure to inform owners , failure to tow cars out of the flood areas , hotel's ability to remove hotel's own cars but not customers' cars , stuff like that) , then you can still claim/sue them.

there have been a large number of prior cases like these. One that comes to mind is the one about the car on the shop-lift which rolled off the lift (!).

oh yeah , the Tribunal Pengguna is damn-kow-good. Very biased towards the consumer. If you're the shop , mati lah for you.
from a lawyer
alasta00
post Aug 10 2007, 04:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
134 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
reminds me of yesterday's case where a porshe was taken for a joyride by a mechanic n crashed it. It's now like a scraped metal.
SUSDrifter
post Aug 10 2007, 04:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,349 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(alasta00 @ Aug 10 2007, 04:23 PM)
reminds me of yesterday's case where a porshe was taken for a joyride by a mechanic n crashed it. It's now like a scraped metal.
*
this case is abt that
SUSdgrebel
post Aug 10 2007, 04:48 PM

Oldfag
*******
Senior Member
2,475 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: kopitiam

remember the crashed porsche incident? the mechanic was enjoying a free ride until that accident happened.
tcting
post Aug 10 2007, 08:22 PM

No more GTI
******
Senior Member
1,448 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


Just be more careful and go to reliable workshop...
Beach_Boy
post Aug 10 2007, 08:27 PM

:D
*******
Senior Member
8,456 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 家で折ること
behind some parking tickets(avenue K's parking in this context)
there's disclaimers
where the company just 'rent' the space to you, and the parking fees includes only the rental fees
and it doesnt include security and whatsoever, so if car got break in or stolen, the parking company should not be liable to the damage
and bla bla bla bla
unitron
post Aug 10 2007, 08:30 PM

W1(R)3d
*******
Senior Member
2,730 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In the shadows behind you


there is another way to solve the disclaimer issue. Especially if you own an expensive car like a Porsche.

Write a contract and ask the shop to sign that they are not to take the car out for stuff like joyride and if they do they are liable to pay for a new car if anything happens.

A contract between u and the shop override any disclaimer.
ronaldjoe
post Aug 10 2007, 08:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
It's true. Say a car gets stolen after it's passed to jockey. No claim can be made from insurance co. sweat.gif
acbc
post Aug 10 2007, 08:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,045 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
My former mech's staff accidentally crashed my car in the workshop. I asked how are they going to settle the damage since there is no way to claim from insurance.

They replaced the entire front end and head lights and repaired the bumper at no charge. The person who droved the car was sacked as well.
kevinlim001
post Aug 10 2007, 11:29 PM

Ethical Hacker
*******
Senior Member
6,142 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Planet called "EARTH"



ya the tribunal for consumer damn cheap some more i heard u need to pay RM 15 for the processing fees and they will 9 tim for u. NOrmally involving in the unfair deal between shop and customer.


Added on August 10, 2007, 11:30 pm
QUOTE(acbc @ Aug 10 2007, 08:50 PM)
My former mech's staff accidentally crashed my car in the workshop. I asked how are they going to settle the damage since there is no way to claim from insurance.

They replaced the entire front end and head lights and repaired the bumper at no charge. The person who droved the car was sacked as well.
*
sure la. If u are driving a Japanese car the damage car will cost the mech 1 months salary already. Wira original parts also dun come cheap

This post has been edited by kevinlim001: Aug 10 2007, 11:30 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0167sec    0.90    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 12:30 AM