Hi, anyone can vote which tyre is better in terms of performance and value for money?
Thank you

Michelin

Michelin XM2+ has one advantage which is long mileage. They last very long. Perfomance wise it is quite bad especially in terms of grip. Also as they get older they get really hard and noisy.

For some sizes they are not worth the money as esentially you are paying for the premium Michelin brand.

I have nothing good to say about CC6. They are quiet with terrible dry and wet grip. If you value safety avoid them. Very prone to aquaplaning even at the smalest puddle of standing water.

Hmm no good choice.

PS31, supposed to be UHP but international reviews has been disappointing and it actually wears off much faster, almost twice faster than typical UHP with 300 TW rating, so the cheap price actually might not be cheap after all!

XM2+, not worth it for its price coz too close to PS3 yet it's like 1or even 2 level category below.

Neo3, no idea but Toyo usually are overrated, never really good in any test comparisons. Anyway maybe the only one worth to try in this list.

CC6, absolutely worthless crap, horrendous grip in whatever conditions, just avoid.

This post has been edited by 6UE5T: Aug 25 2020, 09:18 PM