Seems that the WB is not accurate. Too warm.
Derek87's sap ha sap ha 350D gallery!, C & C pls , dun just view & leave =)
Derek87's sap ha sap ha 350D gallery!, C & C pls , dun just view & leave =)
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 02:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
Seems that the WB is not accurate. Too warm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2007, 03:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 05:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(Mavik @ Sep 4 2007, 11:14 AM) F/16 to get an overall sharp focus on the entire picture. Usually used when taking landscape especially a field of flowers so that all of the flowers are in focus Overall sharpness produced by a lens is dependent on its construction. The best is to refer to the MTF Chart of the lens. Controlling the aperture only controls the DOF and not the sharpness of a taken picture. |
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 05:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(derek87 @ Sep 5 2007, 05:07 AM) "MTF chart?" where can i get it? so compmac.. How do i get the sharpest pic? hmm... focus properly? hehe... so are my pictures sharp enough? hmm.. lotsa confusion here.. The best is to look for this information from the lens manufacturer's website.Examples: Olympus ZD 50mm f2 Macro http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/...0_20M/index.asp Sigma 150mm f2.8 Macro http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/macro/150mm.htm Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR http://nikonimaging.com/global/products/le...8g_if/index.htm |
|
|
Sep 5 2007, 08:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2007, 04:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
Here comes some of my constructive comments.
GF pic #1 Framing is OK. DOF also good enough but you seem to have focused on her cap and the coffee bean logo instead of her face. From what I see, you should be using the internal flash and has caused a harsh shadows especially due to her left hand. It also darkens the background too much and caused overall underexposure. An external bounced flash shot would be a better solution. Since you have buffer from the shutter speed, you can reduce the ISO to get a cleaner picture. GF pic #2 The picture suffered from blown out background and blurriness due to slow shutter speed. I guess you have already notice that. Always remember the 1/focal length shutter speed rule if you don't have IS lens. Some people with steady hands can go up to 1 stop below that rule and still take sharp pictures. Hamster pics Nice of you to post your hamster pictures. I used to keep a few myself about 10 years ago. Sure brought back memories. The best of the crop is the third one. It would be better to rotate the picture 90 degree clockwise. It would also help if you have taken the picture at an angle more to your right so that you can face the hamster front on. Nice control of ISO and shutter speed. I don't have comments on the rest as they are not that good IMO. Hope I'm not too long winded with my 2 sen. |
|
|
Oct 3 2007, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(derek87 @ Oct 3 2007, 05:27 PM) Yeah compmac, if u didnt mentioned it, i wont realize the cap, the logo, and the iso. I remember i focused on the eye then compose the pic. but why did it turned out to be cap and logo focused. Do have steady hands when you recompose a picture. You will easily shift focus when you do it with shallow DOF. Try not to breath when recomposing and when pressing the shutter.About the GFpic2, when it comes to situation like that, while the cap covering light entering the face area, and having a bright BG, making it hard to control the light. Is it a must to use fill in flash? I think it's impossible to keep the BG from blowing out and yet to correctly expose the face right? Thanks, i learn something new today. 1/focallength for shutter speed if i dun have steady hands. i didnt know that. Glad that my hamster pics brought u memory flashbacks. Added on October 3, 2007, 5:31 pm Yeah you are right. no.4, he only wants to escape from me taking pictures of him.. Haish.. and i can only use one hand to snap while holding the camera, coz i have to keep catching him, place him back then shoot again. He is friggin fast.. For bright background pictures, meter the background to properly expose it. Then use fill flash to brighten up the darken areas. I still haven't master this technique with my camera even when using an external flash. Good to know that I have helped you out. Happy shooting! |
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 09:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(derek87 @ Oct 3 2007, 05:49 PM) travis poisoning ah!!! Depending on the type of photography that you are interested, do consider between the external flash and a low-cost telephoto lens. IMO, the external flash is more important than a low-cost telephoto lens. You can look at compatible flashguns if the original ones are too expensive for you.ATM, i just funded enough for a telelens, which im still considering which one to buy. After that, then i'll start funding for a flashgun. :grumbling: Here is the discussion thread. http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=530407 |
|
|
Oct 30 2007, 08:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
Some of my little comments.
Composition of the pretty girl's portrait could be better by not leaving out the hands and fingers unless you are going for half body portraiture. Composition for girls with sunset picture is nice but the sun is overexposed. More silhouette with a proper exposed sun will be better. Meter at the sun and maybe decrease 0.5 - 1 stop exposure should be able to do it. The portrait pose before the sunset pictures looks a bit weird as the girl seems to be correcting herself due to you taking a tilted picture of her. Nice PP sunsets. Faster shutter speeds would be nicer for action pictures to freeze the moment. Finally, thanks for sharing and hope you had a great time there. |
|
|
Oct 30 2007, 12:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
QUOTE(derek87 @ Oct 30 2007, 12:32 PM) Compmac, thanks for ur comments. I also thought the same way of what u said, that these pictures could be better if i did what u mentioned. I posted them up here because i wanted to make sure what i had in mind was correct or not. I'm glad that you have the same thoughts that I have on my comments.:As for picture of the three girls facing the sunset, i had tried metering the sun, and have more silhouette. i looked at the preview and i did not like the picture. Therefore, the picture i took was according to my tastes and styles i think. Here is another similar picture but different composition, let me know what u think ok? thanks. [attachmentid=320289] :The PP sunsets, i want to know, is there anything i can do to snap the sunset to look like this without any PP? :Action pictures, yeah.. it's my first time.. really want to improve on this. I always wanted to go to times square and snap the moving roller coaster to have more understanding about different shutter speeds, but doing this alone is boring.. haha.. anyone wants to go with me? we can make a small activity out of it, and meet each other to discuss? haha.. Lol.. i dun even know what's the name of the place.. i only know it's port dickson.. "if im not mistaken" lol... Don't trust the previews on the LCD. Most of the time will not be the same as on a proper LCD monitor. The PP pictures are not "real" and I don't think you can get those kind of skies here. I prefer the camera able to capture what I see through the viewfinder instead of what I can get through PP. Here's one crappy sunset shot I took quite some time back. ![]() I'm usually a lone ranger when going for photo shoot. PD? Do let me know if you ever drop by Seremban during weekdays as I'm working near there. Then you will have a photographer to accompany you. |
|
|
Nov 1 2007, 09:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
For weekends, might need to plan ahead as I am away from Seremban (go see wife
Good seafood is always great to hear. |
|
|
Nov 1 2007, 03:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2007, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
Just set a date and time and see how things go. A gathering of photographers from different camps should be a good one.
|
| Change to: | 0.0247sec
1.00
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 04:55 AM |