The truth is that nothing much can come out of it since Sedition Act is here to stay. We can all dream on with the trust and bonding and and unified education system that is subject to exploitation and subjugation sometimes like the religious history in SPM.
To sum it up, most of your 'evidence' are nothing but subjective interpretation by somebody else that happened to work in the media or news corporations which are also subject to biases and their personal perceptions. Even the judges and jury are subject t to their own interpretations in the judgments provided the evidence is not subject to manipulations, which could happen sometimes.
PS - My 'perception' is based on universal values espoused by UN.
This is just a discussion. I am not arguing that it must be done immediately. Exploit or not it is still proven to be workable in other countries.
Which of my evidence are subjective? Don't accuse without quoting out. Karma will find you for your wrong accusation.
Then it is your onus to prove that my evidence had been manipulated, not based on your assumption.
Don't bring in unrelated website link without any explanation.
Anyway good try though, for attempting to bring in points that relate on reality but not relevant at all. You just don't know what you are arguing about, langgar here langgar there. No need to bring in unrelated issue which I never raised previously.