QUOTE(ohtheirony @ Nov 27 2020, 09:48 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
3G shutdown is wake up call for telcos to increase their tower and coverage, while 2G shutdown is mere slap in wrist for them but slap in the face for consumers who uses dumbphone just for calls
If you think 4G does not cover as much as 3G, see how much 5G coverage against 3G, and if telcos can't afford to cover as much area for 4G as possible, why do you think they can cover every inch with 5G then?
Furthermore, with this 3G shutdown, they will tend to lose customers and revenue if they are not prepared. Those who needs only calling will not be affected, but if you use internet (and giving them greater revenue), therefore making you more literate in IT, will switch right away or terminate as soon your area loses any coverage for mobile internet use
Even now, when someone tells they only have 3G coverage, the advice you give is to switch to other telco that have better coverage, yet some of them are reluctant. Imagine not covered in 4G and then losing 3G, will they still be hesitant to switch? I don't think so

Here is the culture in Malaysia.
Telcos have poor intentions to retain customers. Its like - You go (port out), its okay, one leave, 10 more comes in.
They wont beg you to stay.
When you say "they will tend to lose customers and revenue if they are not prepared", I would say that will be a new revenue for them. I'm quoting real life examples when Singapore forced a 2G shutdown.
When IMDA announced in 2017 they wanted to shutdown 2G, telcos like Singtel spring into action offering discounts for new and existing customers to buy new 3G enabled phones and sign them up for a new contract.
What I do hope, is that telcos also, upgrade the existing 3G tower to 4G enabled, if they wanted to do so.
Rather than shutting down that 3G tower, and then all traffic will be rerouted to other existing 4G tower. Then we will see more congestion.
Worst part of CS is - when you complain to them about slow speed on 4G, some are reluctant to escalate to next level.
And even when its escalated to next level, they come back and say "We saw the congestion but no plans to upgrade". Problem stays there.
What they could have possibility done, is that if Tower A is already congested, make a reroute of some of the users to next Tower ,say Tower B.
(If one observes the frequently connected
enb-LCID then you will know what I'm talking)
For now, we only have to live with what the telco can offer. Not happy, just port out.