Jeez, that is darn bad news. Kaspersky is one of the best, and now...
But then, worry not, there is still at least free AntiVir.
Cheers...
AOLŪ Active Virus Shield is no longer available., AOL are now offering McAfee
AOLŪ Active Virus Shield is no longer available., AOL are now offering McAfee
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Jeez, that is darn bad news. Kaspersky is one of the best, and now...
But then, worry not, there is still at least free AntiVir. Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 8 2007, 04:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Lets clear this once and for all.
AVIRA AntiVir DOES NOT Use the Kaspersky Engine. Neither does it use its Updating Modules, thus the EXTREME Slow Downs in Updates. Why is it slow? The explanation is simple. If you are downloading almost the whole 1-3MB worth of files, it ought to be slow some how. Thus, For those with high speed connections, refer to these sites to download a full package of the updates. Remember to use a download accelerator or download manager to make the experience more bearable. QUOTE http://dl1.avgate.net/down/vdf/ivdf_fusebundle_nt_en.zip http://dl2.avgate.net/down/vdf/ivdf_fusebundle_nt_en.zip I use the second link more often. Less corruption, less traffic too. The file should come out to be almost 16MB, but rest assured, the traffic there is far less, thus not needing to wait for FTP Line up. Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 14 2007, 08:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
As a matter of fact, I am using AVIRA quite fine.
Another option is NOD32, if you want to save money(apparently), go find the *ahem*s yourself. Cheers to all! P.S. (DIRECTED TO SOME IGNORANT AND NAIVE MEMBERS) WARNING!!: DO NOT ASK FOR PIRATED ITEMS IN THIS FORUM. YOU WILL FACE ACTION IF YOU DO SO. Thanks! |
|
|
Oct 14 2007, 09:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Really? I believe that AVIRA's detection is lower than Kaspersky, even for False Positives.
Clean/Delete viruses? Well, if you know what you are doing, and you know what to do, that shouldn't be a problem. Though I quite agree with the last sentence. "Whats the use of detecting when it cannot fix the problem?" Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 17 2007, 12:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2007, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
No, that was not the internal affair I meant.
It has something to do with s "split' within the company or so. AOL was afraid that AVS will be affected, thus they pulled out Kaspersky's Engine. Sad but true. Cheers! P.S. I didn't know that "internal affair" could have such an interesting misunderstanding... LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Release Candidates can be tried but then, they are still BETAs. I would still advise "those who are not BOLD Hearted" to use ESET NOD32 2.7 version. At least it is Stable and Reliable (Or Appears to be
Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 19 2007, 10:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 19 2007, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Don't worry, Joshua. It is about my Post Count. It hit 1337 yesterday. No longer there already.
Cheers! EDIT: No longer is. Sigh... This post has been edited by natakaasd: Oct 19 2007, 02:56 PM |
|
|
Oct 19 2007, 06:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Understandable. Just so like Spam, isn't it?
After this, stop using AOL when it expires. AntiVir AVIRA or ESET NO32 will make the mark. (Of course, this refers to other members who are pondering too. I know you gotten yourself a copy of ESET Security Suite RC 1) Cheers to all! |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
The reason people don't talk about AVG here is because the title is about AVS.
Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 20 2007, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2007, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Screenshots can tell many things about an AV, but with comparatives, you know even more about it.
GUI = functionality, Comparatives = efficiency. Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2007, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
OT: As a matter of fact, NOD32 is not too user friendly.
Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 29 2007, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
OT: The User-Friendliest is still Norton. Truthfully speaking.
Cheers! |
|
|
Oct 30 2007, 06:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
OT: LOL. Norton Anti-Virus is an Install and Go Program. Quite simple on the New Guys. NOD32 on the other hand, can be very traumatic. But, once you get used to the knack of it, it is one of the best AVs around.
Cheers! |
| Change to: | 0.1543sec
0.28
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:01 AM |