A little bit note to myself and /k before debating the subject.

This is another explanation:

Isu kompaun di bawah AMLA saya pernah cerita dahulu dan saya tak nak ulang. Sila baca post saya: https://www.facebook.com/dr.ssthind/photos/...?type=3&theater.
Lazminya kesalahan yang boleh dikompaunkan, akan dikompaunkan sebelum kes masuk Mahkamah. Kes Riza Aziz ini pelik, Kompaun dikeluarkan selepas perbicaraan dah bermula. Dan Mahkamah pun bagi discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA). (https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/05/14/riza-shariz-given-discharge-not-amounting-to-acquittal). Ertinya dia boleh didakwa semula atas arahan Peguam Negara. Namun seksyen 92(4) AMLA:
'Jika sesuatu kesalahan telah dikompaun di bawah subseksyen (1), tiada pendakwaan boleh dimulakan berkenaan dengan kesalahan itu terhadap orang yang kepadanya tawaran untuk mengkompaun kesalahan itu telah dibuat.'
Ertinya, jika Riza membayar kompaun yang dikenakan, beliau tidak boleh didakwa. So, macam mana Mahkamah akan mengubah perintah DNAA kepada perintan lepas dan bebas (yakni tak boleh didakwa semula) selepas kompaun dibayar? Sebab selepas membuat perintah DNAA, Mahkamah menjadi functus officio, ertinya tidak berupaya membuat apa-apa perintah lanjutan. Untuk mengubah perintah DNAA kepada perintah lepas dan bebas, Peguam Negara kena dakwa semula Riza dan tarik balik kes itu sekali lagi, dan hanya ketika itu Mahkamah berpeluang untuk membuat perintah lepas dan bebas. Tapi seksyen 92(4) AMLA melarang Peguam Negara mendakwa mana-mana orang yang telah membayar kompaun. So, how? Sebab itu saya kata, kompaun kena keluar dulu baru masuk Mahkamah.
Apa-apa pun, sekiranya kompaun dibayar oleh Riza, beliau tidak boleh didakwa lagi (walaupun perintah DNAA kekal). Mungkin ramai yang tak puas hati. Mereka akan menuduh Rosmah, Najib dan PAS mencampuri urusan pendakwaan. Saya nak share dua fakta di sini:
1. DPP yang mengendalikan kes Riza dan yang telah memohon agar Riza diberikan DNAA ialah tak lain tak bukan, Gopal Sri Ram. So, Gopal ni muncikari kerajaan PN kah?
2. Menurut MACC, keputusan untuk menarik-balik pendakwaan dan mengeluarkan kompaun kepada Riza dibuat oleh tak lain tak bukan Thomas Thomas @ Mohan a/l K Thomas sendiri (https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/525708). Sekarang Mohan kata dia tak buat, podah. Saya percaya MACC. So, Mohan ni muncikari kerajaan PN kah?
P.S. Riza at least ada juga bagi balik wang. Sama ada beliau menerima wang halal atau haram dah tak relevan. Kadang-kadang kita tak potong Q tapi polis bagi juga saman. Nak buat apa, bayar ja lah. Lawan kes, yuran peguam lagi mahal. Tak guarantee menang pun. Kira win-win situation lah. Tapi Lim Guan Eng pula bagi apa? Tak ada kompaun, terus dapat perintah lepas dan bebas. Anyway, kes Muhsin Latheef II lawan Lim Guan Eng akan dibicarakan dalam Mahkamah Rayuan pada 18 Ogos 2020.

https://www.facebook.com/dr.ssthind/posts/2608282926053492

means Cash is King,...

tak lepas jgnlah bebas lar.. why ppl like to complicate things like this.. cannot means cannot.. not cannot but still can bla bla bla shiat

Oh, DNAA simply means that the charges are now dropped against you. But, since is non-acquittal, it means they can bring the charge back again next time.

This is usually used for charges that need additional investigation. Why? Sometimes, they charge you for one (say man-slaughter). But then when go court found new evidence which could suggest it to be murder instead. So they will apply for DNAA, drop the man-slaughter charge so can investigate more and determine later if you should be charged as man-slaughter or murder.

Its just law jargon.....

The important part about DNAA.. It means you can still be charged back the same offence later. But it can also be lighter or heavier (pending intestigation outcome).

This post has been edited by bengm2019: May 16 2020, 11:13 AM

Most important is he dont escape msia to hide elsewhere

Macam yes tapi bukan

bearbearwong the lawfirm senior partner, minta pencerahan

Haha.. rightfull explained.. i m just kuli..

DNAA means you are temporary free .. from the charge .. unlike DNA discharge amounting to acquital..

The power to DNAA/DAA lies with DPP.. and whoever signs it.. with regards to who authorise it.. it is an internal matter..

But should DNAA remains forever.. n no one charge back.. it is as good as DNA... n public cant say he is off hook.. as there are chance to re call case again..

But very sure no restriction of travel.. and can stand MP.. n etc.. as times goes longer many witness maybe forgetful about the facts.. missing from country.. cannot trace.. uncooperative.. n etc which may make DNAA forever..

Like CMCO as long as it still there.. police can catch u.. but once it is gone.. no more.. like a weapon..

If he does, the govt will have a lot to answer for......

Thank you.
I take it that AG and prosecution team does not really have solid evidence to support their claim. Hence better they take money than losing their water face.
When they first charged it was to satisfy some people, who had been drumming the issue during the election.