QUOTE(msacras @ Aug 13 2020, 12:06 PM)
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-Poco-F...s.483416.0.htmlExcept for the
1. (only) 60Hz refresh rate (duh, after the resolution and pixel density race, now we’re going for the screen refresh race... since when did it started that people get so obsessed with high refresh rate...)
2. kind of low PWN frequency (may affect some people if you’re sensitive enough to notice it; it’s the inherent characteristics of PWN display especially OLED, not exactly a fair parameter to judge the quality of a display, but experienced manufacturers should had know and avoid this issue in the first place)
3. mono speaker
4. mediocre cameras setup (lack of OIS)
POCO don’t have other noticeable hardware flaws. Built quality of modern glass sandwich phone is just about there, be it cheapo or premium models. Even sub 1k phone with plastic frame can feel very solid nowadays. That’s how far the smartphone making industry has evolved for China brands.
I understand your idea of corners are cut to keep price low. And I believe that’s exactly why we no longer see metal built phone for midrange prices phone. But POCO is lucky enough to be the exception here. In addition it’s blessed with the vapour chamber cooling which paired splendidly with the flagship chip for sustainable performance under load, gotta give them the credit for it.
TL;DR, by compromise a little to settle for “great” instead of “best”, it’s possible to get/deliver a flagship like experience for a midrange like pricing. Manufacturers started to facing difficulties to segment their phones nowadays, where flagships no longer deliver something totally outstandingly that mid/low range couldn’t.
Deswai the most usual tricks they still use are the camera quality (and numbers, KEK), phone storage/memory size&speed, (curved) display quality (and more modernly the refresh race...) and metal/plastic build.
1. Personally I might not care enough for fast refreshed display. I dont game, my phone usage are really normal, like messaging and web browsing. I would argue that the 'race' now are due to spec number. Bigger number looks better

I use 100Hz monitor on desktop PC, but 99% of time I'm on Chrome browsing and youtube, no difference if it's on 60Hz mode. Only when gaming, you need those high refresh rate, although I would argue again, 90-120Hz are more than enough. ROG 144Hz or secret 160Hz just nice on paper.
TLDR nice to have 90/120Hz phone display, not a must for me.
4. I kinda think not big factor unless video recording or low light slow shutter speed. My current mi9T and previous poco f1, both dont have OIS i think, but I dont face an issue capturing photo. Even my OG 1st gen Pixel XL, no OIS but no shutter lag, it's just fast.
Seems like phone manufacturer ( or chipset or camera sensor in our phone now ) are capable of capturing photo with little shutter lag. But yeah, OIS will definitely have cost difference.
I think flagship killer are trend and popular now, because it give you perhaps 95% of what you need in day to day usage ?
Flagship are difficult to justify themselves now, when I see Note 20, thinking it's nice, but when put it side by side to Note 20 Ultra, the thicker bezel, larger punch hole, I felt sad and mad, paying flagship price for Note 20, then knowing you get slight compromise because you didnt pay enough for best of the best