last time with 2000 HT it beat pentium D
and now 4000HT, AMD might think can over take C2D as C2D is almost 2x faster than PD
:: AMD Phenom ::, Barcelona Launched, Phenom Next..
:: AMD Phenom ::, Barcelona Launched, Phenom Next..
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
last time with 2000 HT it beat pentium D
and now 4000HT, AMD might think can over take C2D as C2D is almost 2x faster than PD |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 09:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Jul 28 2007, 09:46 PM) It doesn't work that way. Even 1st generation HTT of 1000Mhz is already too much as reviews showed that a HTT of 200-400Mhz is more that enough for everyday gaming/usage. that true for now... but we dont know the main purpose they increase the HT.... cos computation basically did in procesor and seldom at memory....thus 4000HT wont benefit at all..but how if they implement the 4000HT as a link between the core and the data might transfer faster between 2 core and compute data ... that just my guessing...the real 4000HT still haven tested....IIRC, even Intels new FSB 1333Mhz is in preparation for quad core computation. I don't think the new HT3 of 4000Mhz will lead to any real world benefit as a HTT of 1000Mhz is not even fully utilized! |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0168sec
0.77
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:10 PM |