Not defending him but.... the beginning of science is actually physics... With physics, comes chemistry, then biology. That's the sequence. So, in that sense, what he said is partially true but in wrong wording.
No offence.

Yeah sure, Physics relies on Maths. But Maths is just a tool in Physics because everything in this world could be represented by numbers. But, who discovered all these models? Physicists. Of course, without Philosophy, all these sciences wouldn't even exist. Not sure why the other person thinks science wouldn't exist before civilisation. So long as there're philosophers, there'd be scientists. It's just a matter of how developed the science would be, before/after civilisation.

If you think Physics is just these, you're a retard not me. Lmao, calling other retards when yourself is one? The act of moving itself can be related to Physics. Almost everything you do in daily life is related to Newtonian Physics.

Do you need science for that? I wonder how other animals still exist hmmmm

Why would you use the word 'superior' despite I said the way he said that is wrong? Have you even read what I said?

Yes, this could be the case too, after all, it depends on which branch of Physics is in your mind, for instance, without calculus, Newtonian Physics wouldn't exist, not to mention there're chances that Mathematicians discover a model in which it hasn't been used yet to prove something, but that doesn't mean the model itself is useless.

Let's not derail this topic further

Because I'm talking about the figurative meaning he wants to imply? Given his attempt to write all his opinion with bombastic words without truly understand their meanings, I read that sentence as what I've written in what you've quoted. After all, it's just purely my opinion.