QUOTE(benzxzx @ Apr 8 2020, 02:12 PM)
Yea construction related disputes have to be resolved by CIPAA, if they can meet each other halfway then no issues la.
But freezing assets all these fall under Mareva Injunction, you can only file such applications in our courts of law.
half way settlement depends on the ones acting for the losing side.. CIPAA very straight forward.. bills.. invoice, certificate ada just pay, other issue no care one..But freezing assets all these fall under Mareva Injunction, you can only file such applications in our courts of law.
Mareva injc too big... sub con where can afford undertaking of damages of paymaster millions man.. garnisi/attachment , then possible/more likely
paymaster-main con portions of progressive payments/final payments/retention sums boleh la...
sub con can claim lor... just the portion above... but if gulung tikar then useless... Main con usually ada banyak contra units, pray for contra units which has values...
This post has been edited by bearbearwong: Apr 8 2020, 02:17 PM
Apr 8 2020, 02:16 PM

Quote
0.0232sec
0.28
5 queries
GZIP Disabled