i'm getting 3.2Ghz speed very stable at stock voltage of 1.35V...so probably if you want to lower your temp, try use 1.35V instead of 1.375V...
and also, at full load, i'm getting 75+deg'C as well... but if i blast full fan speed at my casing and also on the air cond, i can get around 5degC improvement or more...
and i'm not using WC... just normal air cooling...
QUOTE(TaiZi@CCF @ Jul 26 2007, 12:20 AM)
I need all the guru to help me.....
I dont know why, I got my Q6600 today, tested all stable, duo orthos full 4 core prime stable for more than 1 hours, I overclocked to only 3.2GHz with 1.375v.
but why the hell my Q6600 running so hot??? I cant believe it how come irenic can get 65c full load at 1.55v....
please tell me why... getting mad.

[attachmentid=266953]
I dont know why, I got my Q6600 today, tested all stable, duo orthos full 4 core prime stable for more than 1 hours, I overclocked to only 3.2GHz with 1.375v.
but why the hell my Q6600 running so hot??? I cant believe it how come irenic can get 65c full load at 1.55v....
please tell me why... getting mad.
[attachmentid=266953]
Added on July 30, 2007, 9:25 pmyup... my TAT and core temp about the same...give them a tolerance about +/- 2degC can already...hehe....
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jul 27 2007, 11:28 PM)
Someone already compared Coretemp with TAT and the temp is very similar. TAT is build by Intel and this cant be wrong.
This post has been edited by kevyeoh: Jul 30 2007, 09:25 PM
Jul 30 2007, 09:23 PM

Quote
0.0350sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled