Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ◙The New PROTON PERSONA◙, ~Official Thread~

views
     
ezralimm
post Jul 23 2007, 01:55 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dazzle @ Jul 23 2007, 12:14 PM)
u all still interested in Proton.
Waste alot of rakyat want money.
Proton own lotus company. This is not a very big deal.
But is a waste money.
They had establish their company for more that 20 year.
Somehow the quality on the current market is damn shit.
I will not have my life with Proton. Proton louzy
Hidup tanpa proton, Malaysia boleh.
*
ROTFLMAO. Minimalist basher. sweat.gif

Time would tell how this generation of sedans will be.

20yr's is very young for a car company.
Eg. Korea protected it's home brands by banning Jap imports completely for more than 40 years!

About quality, my dad's perdana has done 220,000km without any major problems (except expected wear and tear lah of course..eg tires, windshield wipers etc, spark plugs, timing belt etc).

I dont believe they are wasting rakyat's money. Money internally circulated to local industries. To the local economy. Proton has stuck to making cheap cars that people earning third world wages can afford. The upcoming gen2 sedan, priced at ~RM50k (midrange) is very reasonable. Even if NAP/proton didnt exist, a jap sedan of similar size/wt (~1200kg class) will cost upwards of RM70k OTR. It will only waste your money if you insist on buying 2.0L upward cars that come with super high tax as a result of NAP. The average malaysian probably couldnt afford a baseline 2.0L BMW 3series that would cost about RM180k OTR (WITHOUT NAP!) without going into debt.


The H-Line, RM55k variant seems attractive if it comes with standard features like ABS and 4+Airbags.


edited: grammatical errors.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Jul 23 2007, 01:58 PM
ezralimm
post Jul 23 2007, 03:48 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(NewbieBetta @ Jul 23 2007, 02:54 PM)
who are you then..atleast most of the ppl are switching to perodua which have better quality build then proton..do you drive proton at the 1st place..if you didnt pls dont talk so much..lets say u did drive a proton..

but the fact,perodua is making better money then proton..& proton is whining pls buy me VW..pls buy me..Not proton only MAS also..having same problem losing..
*
doh.gif

...

Proton and perodua are aiming at different market segments... whistling.gif
ezralimm
post Jul 23 2007, 08:33 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(nexus @ Jul 23 2007, 06:07 PM)
my experience in my industrial traning last time.
government offer a project to setup a lab in an government institute, so ofcos only bumiput*ra company can take the project.
after tht ,bumiput*ra company find a chin*se company to take the project.

at first, the government pay bumiput*ra company 100k for tht project.
then bumiput*ra company find the chin*se company and offer them 50k for the project.
at last, chin*se company finish the project with fulfillment of all the spec required with 10k.

at the end, bumiput*ra company earn 50k, chin*se company earn 40k, and government hav a 10k lab by paying 100k.

WTA is this the same as wht happens to P1 too?
let say P1 initially put a budget of RM500 for a dashboard, but at the end they only have a RM100 dashboard installed in the car. so the result is a crappy car with high building cost.
*
Nope. that is coffeshop talk. BS.

Chinaman say: No sauce. Well, sauce may be tasty with some govt projects - but does not go well with Proton.

Proton is operated as a company like any other. It does not economy of scale, but is coping ok i guess.

RM50k for a 1200kg sedan OTR is reasonable. Do a comparison of the OTR prices for 1200kg class sedans in other countries if you dont believe me.


Added on July 23, 2007, 8:39 pm
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jul 23 2007, 07:49 PM)
Please go to www.honda.com.my.
Check the Honda City price in Langkawi:
RM53.800 for IDSL and RM56,800 for VTEC.
It is NOT dreaming. Get ur facts straight, we CAN be buying a City at Gen-2 prices if Proton doesn't exist.
You're OWNZED. brows.gif
*
The City/FitAria is a ~1000kg class sedan. It's a lil smaller than a gen2 sedan, which is a ~1200kg class sedan.

The City/FitAria is a sedan version of the small Jazz/Fit.

A fair comparison would be between the City and the upcoming "Sedan" version of the Savvy platform.

A Honda 1200kg class sedan, the civic, costs RM75k OTR (WITHOUT TAX/NAP)... even if NAP/proton didnt exist, it would be about RM85k with GST and normal taxes... much more than the gen2 sedan. Of course, it is abit more technologically advanced. But the gen2 sedan is only ~RM50k

...it's still reasonable.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Jul 23 2007, 08:39 PM
ezralimm
post Jul 24 2007, 10:21 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(haylui @ Jul 24 2007, 10:04 AM)
don't forget msia government impose 120% tax on Japanese car and 300% tax on European cars
*
doh.gif

Dewd... I was saying WITHOUT NAP/PROTON (Same tax on Proton and Honda), the price would be RM70k+. About 85k for a Civic (Currently RM113k OTR).


RM50k is cheap for a 1200kg sedan. Check overseas prices (OTR) for other 1200kg sedans if you dont believe.
ezralimm
post Jul 24 2007, 11:27 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(phonar @ Jul 24 2007, 12:35 PM)
You again?

Crap! Who judging a car categories by their body weight? doh.gif
*
Yeah, it's me again. smile.gif Nice to meet you too.

Just putting sense into ppl's heads and stopping bashers from making ridiculous comparisons.

Time will tell.... People will judge in the showrooms,.. the real size of cars in relation to weight.

Believe me.. ~1000kg cars feel different inside and look a lil smaller on the outside than the ~1200kg cars. I had to make a choice recently.

1000kg vs 1200kg
Ford: Fiesta vs Focus
Honda: Jazz/Fit Aria vs Civic
Toyota: Yaris vs Corolla
Proton: Savvy vs gen2
Mazda: Mazda2 vs Mazda3

still dont believe me? Owh rite, i forgot... bashers will always say things like: "gen2 needs to be heavier because proton engineers not so skilled lah bla bla bla". They often have teh l33t skill of clairvoyance to make broad sweeping claims like that. Then they go around saying the Civic should be RM30k when even without tax, without NAP, it's above RM70k (assuming proton/NAP didnt exist). Ignorance.

IM not a proton fanatic. Heck, i dont even drive a proton. My jazz is a month old... and already has a bit of dashboard creeking. fvck. But overall it's a good car. I get 6-8L/100km with a light foot on the pedal... I wonder how the FC figures in the brochure was calculated. Honda City (Fit Aria) 5.XL/100km is kinda hard to believe.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Jul 24 2007, 11:29 PM
ezralimm
post Jul 25 2007, 08:23 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(bcktang @ Jul 25 2007, 01:41 AM)

Do they dare make something new ? not i suppose, especially with the result of the 'JUARA' if you remember, and the 'TIARA'

person who design is brave,
person who approve is a d*** stupid nuts....
*
Teh Juara was a mistake. Causing sore eyes and blindness.

It was not exactly "new"... it was a reskinned Mitsubishi Town Box, a micro van... similar to what perodua did with the Myvi... just that they made the diahatsu model better looking... instead of uglier.
ezralimm
post Aug 14 2007, 08:13 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
ooh, the door trims look different...
ezralimm
post Aug 16 2007, 07:03 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(nerd @ Aug 16 2007, 06:12 PM)
obviously he has never driven a car before laugh.gif
*
he was referring to a picture of a preproduction unit.

PaulTan has since clarified that that was an exceptional case...only three of those cars existed.
ezralimm
post Aug 19 2007, 08:14 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Well, but the bottom line is Proton recycles about 6,000,000,000 ringgit back to malaysian workers pockets each Quarter (1/4 year).

Money that would have gone overseas workers pockets if not for proton.
ezralimm
post Aug 19 2007, 12:06 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
the reduced size spare tire is to increase boot space and decrease fuel consumption a little.
ezralimm
post Aug 24 2007, 11:47 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
That picture has been disproven lar...

It's from an early prototype. One of three ever built. An error on the part of Siemens that made it.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0196sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:10 AM