Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 3, The journey continues....
|
|
 Sep 14 2007, 07:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
dude with the choice changing ure fsb strap on the p35 instead of auto on p965p i dont makes a difference e6600 vs e6*50
it only takes of the limits on the rams hmm makes u wonder with certain x38 and x48 having a 1600 fsb strap.... This post has been edited by cstkl1: Sep 14 2007, 07:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2007, 01:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(rlhc17 @ Sep 26 2007, 01:31 AM) i use OCCT fast n reliable only need 30mins yup and second part u forgot u can make it to monitor ure vcore via speedfan.. when the stress fails.. check ure vcore for the appropriate adjustment... i think this is the main selling point |
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 12:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
must have cost a bomb
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 01:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
hmm looking at the time of post kekek looks like somekind of underground deal...kekeke
Added on October 11, 2007, 1:38 am QUOTE(syazone @ Oct 9 2007, 05:30 PM) 1st attempt hmm temps??E6300 @ 2.33Ghz, 1.25v (on 965P DS3) sigh, i cant increase FSB anymore... FSB 340, it wont boot up  .... izzit bcoz of my ram? (mushkin ValueRam  )not suppose to operate higher than 62 This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 11 2007, 04:03 AM |
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 04:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Oct 11 2007, 01:56 AM) I think the temperature is ok, as for E6300, B2 stepping normally is hotter than the L2 stepping. that wasnt the point... correct if i'm wrong.  he is at the limit for ... G0 limit is 72 btw |
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 15 2007, 09:23 AM) show me ur multiplier as well i will check if thats a fsb wall if u dun mind hmm u mean the LDT reference coreclock??...doin some investigation on the fsb wall now...some ppl say fsb wall exist....some say it doesnt, what is actually limiting the FSB is the NBCC (northbridge core clock).... so i m checking out on that now heheso far i tested that theory it doesnt multi's depending on heat wall.. lower multi... more stress/dependencies on mobo higher multis ... more stress/dependencies on proc Added on October 15, 2007, 2:37 pm QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 15 2007, 09:23 AM) show me ur multiplier as well i will check if thats a fsb wall if u dun mind hmm u mean the LDT reference coreclock?? ( hmm the prob with this is actually straps as most mobos use this for strap reference)hence instability to overclock this....doin some investigation on the fsb wall now...some ppl say fsb wall exist....some say it doesnt, what is actually limiting the FSB is the NBCC (northbridge core clock).... so i m checking out on that now heheso far i tested that theory it doesnt multi's depending on heat wall.. lower multi... more stress/dependencies on mobo higher multis ... more stress/dependencies on proc This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 15 2007, 02:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2007, 10:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 15 2007, 02:57 PM) iinm LDT is used by AMD only... the term LDT is used by nforce chipsets. i think for intel chipsets is called HT link speed.regarding the NBCC, we will take E6850 (x9) as example by using 400 x 9 and 450 x 8, this 2 combinations will give u 3.6Ghz proc clock speed but 450 x 8 will have more stress on the n/b.... so when u reached the max of the nbcc then u will hit a fsb wall NBCC = (default multi/set multi) x FSB 400 x 9 (9/9) x 400 = 400 450 x 8 (9/8) x 450 = 506.25 plz remember to multiply by 4 as intel is quad pump right now and do correct me if i m mistaken and what do u mean by heat wall.... if its the heat limitation then i think heat is probably limiting the FSB not the multi this has been proven when we did DI on the same proc.... it just the bus frequency between the northbridge and southbridge. the times 4 thingy is just Front side bus speed. but speed is FSB/4. This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 16 2007, 10:05 AM |
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 06:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(zeustronic @ Oct 25 2007, 04:17 PM) @3.6Ghz felt lots of difference while gaming, rendering stuff, loading apps & when u multiplayer LAN or Online loading speed alwis faster than others hehe^^... tip its not the mhz that makes the differenceits the bus speed in relation to ure rams thats whats making the difference except for rendering its pure mhz Added on October 25, 2007, 6:50 pm QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 24 2007, 05:58 PM) from 3.0ghz OCed to 3.6ghz i can actually notice a lil smoothness on my system.... seriously yup not badkeep getting the lowest vcore for 3.6ghz currently 1.4v not too bad eh x38 now sean can do with his x6800 also at 1.4 kekek compared to last time This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 25 2007, 06:50 PM |
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
whats the stock voltage for a e8400.
curious seeing a lot of ppl having different voltages for this proc at stock speed auto setting. |
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
ok then i just tested one nut proc
400x8.5@3.4 occt 1 hour and prime 3 hours stable at 1.1v batch/fpo: Q46A332 default vcore is 1.09v This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 8 2008, 06:43 PM |
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
another feature missing on the e8400 vs e6850
the enchanced halt state is not as advance. at idle the e6850 is cooler. |
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
hmmm initially thought of not posting but what the heck
oh yeah this was using dumb cooler and a cheap ram. Proc:E8400 Q746A332@ 3.6ghz 1.15v Mobo: Asus Maximus Formula SE Ram: OCZ Gamer Gold XTC - PC2-6400 CL5 @ 2.1v [attachmentid=374884] if this is not a good batch then i have no idea what is.. so far as i can tell this are the voltages for this batch Stock voltage = 1.09 400x8.5=3.4@1.1v (i think u can say stock voltage.. i couldnt do less 0.01v on the maximus) 400x9.0=3.6ghz@1.15v Settings for the rest of the voltages : Lowest value. cant attempt 4ghz yet till i have my sweet rams return back from rma.. This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 8 2008, 09:06 PM |
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 10:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jan 8 2008, 10:15 PM) nice.. with a little touch of 0.5 lolol. hmm what board is perfect for this wolfsdale? yeah and all this on passive cooling |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2008, 07:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(v1rtual @ Feb 4 2008, 05:26 PM) may i know what are the possible caused that my mobo temp go up to 150c when i only increase my Vcore to 1.425?? common issue..[attachmentid=393551] thats a lot of ppl are put off with asus probe.. it sometimes whos my vdimm went 3.0v.. |
|
|
Feb 10 2008, 01:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Feb 9 2008, 11:47 PM) i feel like urs is a bit slow .... e4400 @ 3.04GHz only get 28 secs? hint hint green go button..i tot supposed to be around 19-21 secs ? is something else running in background? again hint HINT. if u feel its slow. This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 10 2008, 01:49 AM |
|
|
Feb 25 2008, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Lurker @ Feb 25 2008, 09:34 AM) is the e8200 and the asus pk5r a good combo? get the P5k Pro..but hmm i think asus low end mobo currenty the p35 shouldnt be paired with penryn procs. until they get better ranges on their fsb termination voltage.. if not ure going to do brute force overclocking so answer is wait.. or try the dfi DK who has good increments on the FSB termination. i know this fact sux.. kekeke |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 06:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Lurker @ Feb 26 2008, 06:19 PM) i was reccommended the p5kr coz i wanted the built in firewire and esata ports eh i think P5K pro is RM500-Rm600 bro .. 400 is quite pricey ady for a mobo for me, dun think would wanna pay more  all because of the EPU hmm wait dude best bet.. see what the P45 has to offer.. supposedly the same board but with PCiE 2.0 but its the bios that u need to look for. abit seems to be going pretty decent. and firewire.. .. hmm didnt check whether there was a external on board connector.. thought all of them had it. |
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(RokXIII @ Mar 1 2008, 05:44 PM) Would like to ask, if my system passed OCCT test, orthos test(both tested for 8 hours++), and passed SuperPI 32M, but failed/hang during gaming(such as NFS:Pro Street, COD 4), may I know which parts have the highest probability to cause the unstable problem? all the games u mentioned are opengl..The rig: Processor - E6300 @ 3.15GHz @ 1.325vcore(default) RAM - Hynix FP-Y5 667 @ 450MHz @ 2.1v @ 5-6-6-18(auto timing) Mobo - Biostar Tforce 965PT PSU - Acbel iPower 450W Thanks! its ure mem/nb/fsb not stable. ure proc is. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0404sec
 0.30
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 10:39 PM |
Quote