I received cease and desist from TM because my GitHub guide encourage noob to replace own GPON cause issue on their OLT

Those noob doesn't understand about PON
I guess noob ignore my warning:


I had to remove any TM related OMCI blobs and dump online
even UART dump and OMCI pcap file

This happen because 'someone' made call 100 and asking technician to fix his PON Stick,
It's obviously outside their pay-grade, technician cannot call HBC to modify OLT just to allow his PON Stick.

Take note that OLT can fake Operation Status, even with correct PLOAM and SN and get O5, still can't have internet because OLT faking O5.
Can't further investigation as his PON Stick lacks of this diagnostic:


I am using my own Identifier on TM network, trial run to separate DIY, my stick and original


TM can query ME 350

rest assured, who use my firmware are safe

I never believe what TM said. I am sure everyday people call and ask for PPPoE password but they still insist on using it.
Do you think their legal department is so free to work on him just because one guy call and enquire about PON stick?

TM is doing it to hide something, that is the D-Link firmware. It has kill-switch inside, loaded with security vulnerabilities and maybe some other bad stuff too.