They have rights to ban the unifi account if they identified users using custom ONU? Walao... Shitty company that provides lousy CPE can do that meh?

I got call from someone claiming be TM...

tldr; TM want user to stop using ODI DFP-34X-2C2 on 2Gbps:
1. Conflict OMCI parameter with D-Link (I blame Realtek for this, inconsistency between RTL960x family)
2. Don't call 100 to troubleshoot ODI DFP-34X-2C2
3. Keep old ONU (when technician come, revert back to original ONU)
4. Using custom ONU, please clone ONU properties properly, no missing single property or even one character! (if this keep wrong or wrong place, TM has right to ban your unifi)

TM not saying this illegal, but trouble for them and technician team

I been instruct to edit main thread and my GitHub about these

I hope this not haram 

TM's technician knows nothing about networking lol. Their SOP is just to come, basic troubleshoot, change device and go. You initiate any conversation  with them related to advance networking, they will be passive and remain unresponsive all the time.

They have rights to ban the unifi account if they identified users using custom ONU? Walao... Shitty company that provides lousy CPE can do that meh?

They probably do somewhere in ToS

I wonder if this is a "no you're not supposed to be able to pull 2Gbps, we give 1+1 intentionally as most people won't be able to saturate the connection (but pay us more)"

not just TM, same with TIME. since GPON ONU SFP is rooted, you basically can do anything, including "force TX laser on" and this will cause other user lose their internet connection.

and you can sniff down stream packet, even with AES encryption, I guess this can be crack, most GPON use basic 128-bit just fast enough to decrypt.

also hijacking GEM Port to by pass OLT speed cap, if OLT is configured badly.

fiber is shared connection...

so, TM just don't want another RTL960x GPON ONU on their fiber, this clash with D-Link that use RTL9607DQ (part of RTL960x family)

as we know, ODI Stick unable to saturate upload speed, because OLT use different parameters that RTL9607DQ understand, not RTL9601D/CI

buying ODI Stick now can be risky if you don't set ONU Information properly, TM or other ISP has right to ban,

bad setting ONU information mean not hiding enough,
check what OLT, if OLT is Nokia, avoid using Nokia ONU info, etc...

I am NOT RESPONSIBLE for this, I merely share what can be done if you do it correctly.

I am looking another solution, most GPON ONU SFP that I sell lately is not Realtek based, it's Intel based SFP which is hard to get since it's part of 4G/5G Cell Tower

not just TM, same with TIME. since GPON ONU SFP is rooted, you basically can do anything, including "force TX laser on" and this will cause other user lose their internet connection.

and you can sniff down stream packet, even with AES encryption, I guess this can be crack, most GPON use basic 128-bit just fast enough to decrypt.

also hijacking GEM Port to by pass OLT speed cap, if OLT is configured badly.

fiber is shared connection...

so, TM just don't want another RTL960x GPON ONU on their fiber, this clash with D-Link that use RTL9607DQ (part of RTL960x family)

as we know, ODI Stick unable to saturate upload speed, because OLT use different parameters that RTL9607DQ understand, not RTL9601D/CI

buying ODI Stick now can be risky if you don't set ONU Information properly, TM or other ISP has right to ban,

bad setting ONU information mean not hiding enough,
check what OLT, if OLT is Nokia, avoid using Nokia ONU info, etc...

I am NOT RESPONSIBLE for this, I merely share what can be done if you do it correctly.

I am looking another solution, most GPON ONU SFP that I sell lately is not Realtek based, it's Intel based SFP which is hard to get since it's part of 4G/5G Cell Tower

So it mean Vsol 2.5G (V2802RH) that using RTL9601D should not be used with unifi right? 

Understood. I don't think casual users willing to take risk into doing this. Power users will utilize this with compatible equipment with right ONU information correctly without getting their account to be banned. They still using 128-bit, still in 2023? Very bad CS practice.

what I read, same with XGPON/XGSPON, just need better down stream encryption at 256 or above, if SoC manufacturer willing sell it cheap...

RTL960x user reporting in and it's still running strong with pink fibre 1Gbps.

It wouldn't bypass speedcap as TIME uses XGPON for 2Gbps.

However, I can get 1040Mbps instead of 940Mbps now.

And, it does have better fibre reading than my Huawei ONU so that's a plus too.

not just TM, same with TIME. since GPON ONU SFP is rooted, you basically can do anything, including "force TX laser on" and this will cause other user lose their internet connection.

and you can sniff down stream packet, even with AES encryption, I guess this can be crack, most GPON use basic 128-bit just fast enough to decrypt.

also hijacking GEM Port to by pass OLT speed cap, if OLT is configured badly.

fiber is shared connection...

so, TM just don't want another RTL960x GPON ONU on their fiber, this clash with D-Link that use RTL9607DQ (part of RTL960x family)

as we know, ODI Stick unable to saturate upload speed, because OLT use different parameters that RTL9607DQ understand, not RTL9601D/CI

buying ODI Stick now can be risky if you don't set ONU Information properly, TM or other ISP has right to ban,

bad setting ONU information mean not hiding enough,
check what OLT, if OLT is Nokia, avoid using Nokia ONU info, etc...

I am NOT RESPONSIBLE for this, I merely share what can be done if you do it correctly.

I am looking another solution, most GPON ONU SFP that I sell lately is not Realtek based, it's Intel based SFP which is hard to get since it's part of 4G/5G Cell Tower

Lucky you...

your PINK is only have PINK ISP or got other ISP?

some user can't use GPON ONU SFP on PINK

after O5, OLT reject and stuck at O2

so avoid using ODI Realtek right
this Intel based SFP ODI IS Best ??? like without Trouble right ?

Don't think got other ISP since no other VLANs detected apart from the usual TIME VLAN.

There's a built-in tool to detect rogue ONU within Huawei OLT. Since TIME's network is almost fully Huawei infra, they can use it to find those non Huawei ONUs easily.

So far, Intel based SFP is very respectful...

even I as Maxis on TM, using Intel one:
1. SFP only have single LAN
2. MIB matched
3. OMCI kick in
4. SFP disconnect LAN interface between Host
5. Sad, Maxis/DiGi/Celcom/Viewquest can't use

only reason ODI can use because, ODI and VSOL impliment quick code hacks that remap all EntityId into single LAN, this will cause VLAN clashed

2 Gbps User A:


2G Gbps User B:


My Maxis on TM:

as you can see, some Unifi user have different VLAN mapping, ODI/VSOL hack is EntityId map horrible and clash
Indeed, need OMCI emulation to that specific Huawei request

no problem for me 5.Maxis/DiGi/Celcom/Viewquest can't use i am not sad

i wont switch other ISP

so i will stay UNIFI so i am sure wont trouble i think Intel based SFP are Safety
my area most BTU IS Huawei mean my area tm infra using huawei right
i check my area many place i saw all they still use BTU Huawei
no other brand btu like nokia

Seremban use Nokia OLT,
and default ONU on Nokia OLT:
1. Huawei
2. Nokia
3. ZTE
4. Fiberhome
5. D-Link (Ultra Plan)

I use D-Link information on the SFP and it works,
D-Link information with Huawei S/N

this might TM able to catch me by reading OLT with mismatched information lol

ohhh
i am from Penang my area how i check what tm infra they use OLT and default ONU on OLT
how i find to easy to found

OLT can be check via OMCI CLI.
ONU is, I went every customer house and do the check that way...

my old SFP programmer is dead, flash many sticks
I bought new one that use USB instead of plugging UART pin out.


in case my customers broke their SFP with wrong command, I can reprogramming it back

with Intel Lantiq based SFP, no need tear down.

but with Realtek based SFP, need to tear down and desolder SPI Flash (can't flash directly it will fried the SoC processor, because it directly access)

by design, Intel is superior, as always.

RTL960x user reporting in and it's still running strong with pink fibre 1Gbps.

It wouldn't bypass speedcap as TIME uses XGPON for 2Gbps.

However, I can get 1040Mbps instead of 940Mbps now.

And, it does have better fibre reading than my Huawei ONU so that's a plus too.