QUOTE(MrAndyLau @ Jan 5 2008, 10:16 PM)
I WOULD SUMMARIZE AGAIN...
FIRST HAND=100
FROM HAND 2ND TILL 12TH=2200
FROM HERE WE CAN SEE THE FIRST HAND HE PUT RM100, FROM HAND SECOND TILL 12TH HE RISK OUT 2200, IN OHTER WORDS, IN CASE HE LOSE 13 HANDS IN A ROW, HE LOSE OUT RM2300...
SO HOW DOES HE SET THE ANTE FROM HAND 2 TILL 12...THE ADD UP SHOULD BE RM2200...
IF THE FIRST HAND HE LOSE, LOSE RM100
2ND HAND, HE MAY PUT 100 LOSE AGAIN, ACCUMULATED LOSE 200
3RD HAND MAYBE PUT 100, IF WIN PUT 200, IF DOUBLE UP SUCCESS, STILL WIN RM100. IF NOT, ACCUMULATED LOSE 300.
HAND 4TH TILL 12 STILL THINKING.....
SO HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE, HE DID NOT USE MARTINGALE, SO WINNING LET SAID ON HAND 13TH DEFINITELY ONLY COVER PORTION OF ACCUMULATED LOSE...MEANING HIS METHOD DEPEND HEAVILY ON WINNING X HANDS IN A ROW...THE X SHOULD BE AS SHORT AS POSSIBLE...MAYBE 2 AT MOST 3.
THE REASON I SAID THIS IS BECAUSE RM2200 NEED TO BE SHARE UP FOR HAND 2 TILL 13...IT IS A BIT HIGHER THAN FLAT BET ONLY DURING BAD STREAK TIME.....
STILL THINKING THE REST RANDOM VS RANDOMNESS....PROGRESSION....
well, remember the pascal distribution? FIRST HAND=100
FROM HAND 2ND TILL 12TH=2200
FROM HERE WE CAN SEE THE FIRST HAND HE PUT RM100, FROM HAND SECOND TILL 12TH HE RISK OUT 2200, IN OHTER WORDS, IN CASE HE LOSE 13 HANDS IN A ROW, HE LOSE OUT RM2300...
SO HOW DOES HE SET THE ANTE FROM HAND 2 TILL 12...THE ADD UP SHOULD BE RM2200...
IF THE FIRST HAND HE LOSE, LOSE RM100
2ND HAND, HE MAY PUT 100 LOSE AGAIN, ACCUMULATED LOSE 200
3RD HAND MAYBE PUT 100, IF WIN PUT 200, IF DOUBLE UP SUCCESS, STILL WIN RM100. IF NOT, ACCUMULATED LOSE 300.
HAND 4TH TILL 12 STILL THINKING.....
SO HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE, HE DID NOT USE MARTINGALE, SO WINNING LET SAID ON HAND 13TH DEFINITELY ONLY COVER PORTION OF ACCUMULATED LOSE...MEANING HIS METHOD DEPEND HEAVILY ON WINNING X HANDS IN A ROW...THE X SHOULD BE AS SHORT AS POSSIBLE...MAYBE 2 AT MOST 3.
THE REASON I SAID THIS IS BECAUSE RM2200 NEED TO BE SHARE UP FOR HAND 2 TILL 13...IT IS A BIT HIGHER THAN FLAT BET ONLY DURING BAD STREAK TIME.....
STILL THINKING THE REST RANDOM VS RANDOMNESS....PROGRESSION....
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13
let say, 0 represent our starting point, neither lose or win. ( Pascal only can be start using when you start to lose, which means, on 2nd hand )
if he lose on first hand, 2nd hand lose, 3rd hand lose = 300, it's correct.
and again, u see, on 4th hand, if he win, means he got negative -100, right?
so, we back to the first hand again which means 0 1 1 2 ( 1 ) 3 5 8 13 ,
if u win, means u got nothing to lose, right? u back to 0 again, cover the -100 loses.
but if u lose again, u go to the fifth hand 0 1 1 2 1 ( 3 ) 5 8 13 which can cover the -200
so, if u win, u win 100, if u lose, u go to the 6th hand which is 5,
just remember, PASCAL system help u to minimize the loss and win a little, not for many.
that's why, u can use RM2300 for 13 step.
just add my cent
Jan 6 2008, 11:10 AM

Quote
0.0311sec
1.12
7 queries
GZIP Disabled