all in stock... PSU is 400W Std rated... wif 80GB SATA HDD... so can say TS did an excellent job...
This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Jun 21 2007, 05:42 PM
Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140/E2160/E2180 Thread, Discussion & Compilation
|
|
  Jun 21 2007, 05:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet  
|
here's a screenie of a customer's E2160's Super_PI... next customer only i OC cuz this 1 have to rush it out... tak sempat OC...
all in stock... PSU is 400W Std rated... wif 80GB SATA HDD... so can say TS did an excellent job... This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Jun 21 2007, 05:42 PM |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2007, 01:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(pcomet @ Jun 22 2007, 01:16 AM) I just bought : can see ur Corsair use wat chip...? new Corsair got lotsa negative comments on OC'ing... but i know i reached 266x9 and RAM DDR800 wif 2 pcs Mushkin 512MB DDR667 RAM... for DDR800 better to get Team or Crucial... cuz Corsair only give Micron chip for DDR1066 and above... C2D 2160 Gigabyte GA-p35-DS3 Galaxy 8600GT (OC) 2 x 1GB Corsair Value Ram Enermax 460W 1 160GB HDD 1 Imation DVD writer Audigy 2zs Possible oc the proc and the GPU for more better performance?Just go for some safe OC then should be ok , coz dun have bigger cooler~ Let me know how to oc it , pm me or post here . tqtq If later i change my ram to 2gb xms 800 corsair ram will it betteR?   |
|
|
Jun 22 2007, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(superpc @ Jun 22 2007, 02:25 PM) lol all ppl take 2160 as core 2 duo >.< yeah... Pentium Dual Core is kinda cacat in a way... it is pentium actually pity, pentium has been 4gotten since core 2  |
|
|
Jun 25 2007, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jun 24 2007, 12:39 AM) Pentium is legendary name anyway. Regardless of what architecture they implement. there was 1ce upon a time where 51% of the world hated Pentium...  |
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jul 2 2007, 11:59 AM) Wow, thats back in 1996. Do u still have it? It nice sometimes playing with good old software. err... QBasic...?  |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 07:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
izzit true tat Celeron 4** series(conroe-L) = E2140...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Jul 30 2007, 10:33 AM) Yeap, with 1 core less u sure it's single core...? i only noticed half the cache gone...  |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(Ah Shawn @ Jul 21 2007, 01:34 AM) actually i tried my frens arctic freezer 7 on my e2160 n i managed 2 clock in bout 3.2ghz.did prime 95 test.stable 4 bout 5hrs dy n still going.trying 2 get a geminii n test 2 c whether my proc can go higher. i did tat to my boss's rig 2... but using GA-P35-DS3... but super_PI get 19 sec only... my E6300 can get 18sec on 3.15GHz... on GA-965P-DS4...  This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Jul 30 2007, 02:25 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(Hungry_Wolf @ Jul 30 2007, 03:15 PM) celeron 400 series is single core. woo... will try it out as soon as i get my other components...  |
|
|
Aug 6 2007, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Aug 6 2007, 06:58 PM) Nope, the E4xxx series is better due to the 2mb cache as opposed to the 1mb cache of the E2xxx. Anyways u cant ask more from a sub rm200+ chips, what else, they overclock well. err... didn't some reviewers already prove tat having more cache has not much diff in real time performance... |
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
haih.... Celeron 420 not OC able wif GA-945GCMX-S2... not in the mood to try on other mobo d...
 gonna get E2160 to wait for Penryn...  |
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 10:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(fesick @ Aug 11 2007, 08:41 AM) vcore 1.29 at 2.4ghz..whats wrong ah?is it normal?idle temp is 47..after run orthos test cpu stress..jump up to 70-80 degree..thats hot.. wow... i haven't done tat test yet... been bz lately... |
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Aug 8 2007, 11:08 AM) AMD X2 can easily reach 3GHz if ur RAM can easily reach 1000MHz DDR2.. super_PI..? |
|
|
|
|
|
 Aug 13 2007, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 12 2007, 08:30 PM) damn motherboard. Biostar TP35D2-A7 freakin' annoying. err.... the Mushkins Enhanced basic in my shop can do 400 easily d... also reach 500 b4... no big deal... unless it's advance module chip... but loose stability at 550 and can't do further than 1200... it goes by 3:5 F:R ratio by default. so imagine how far can i OC la. aihhh. well, i reach 2ghz so far and you know what - i'm damn suprised that my KVR DDR2 667 can do 416mhz! yup!! that's DDR2 832 already! i haven't memtest or whatever la but seriously, if don't touch 2.6ghz then i'm really not happy la.  the worst thing is... my Corsair XMS2 1GBkit(512MB X 2) does the same exact thing at half price... but wif tighter timings... |
|
|
Aug 13 2007, 01:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(cavcite @ Aug 12 2007, 12:37 PM) ermm..meaning?cedar mill is better or conroe is better?due to cache? Cedar Mill was way better than Conroe-L in terms of OC... but not for normal use...Cedar Mill can't win over Conroe at all... *Cedar Mill = Celeron 3 series *Conroe = Core 2 Duo *Conroe-L = Celeron 4 series... |
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 13 2007, 02:25 AM) hehe. i'm surprised to see my KVR reach that. even my DDR400 BT-D43 also don't go that far. err... DDR800 can go further... this one, Kingston chip and Hynix chip. http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=228449ahh. no need to buy DDR2 800 already. yay. i play around 500MHz since my GA-965P-DS4 & Corsair XMS2 1GBkit(512MBx2)...Here is a cincai OC juz to show how easy it is to be more than 400MHz... Here's my another OC under testing...  which i 4got to turn off EIST and all those crap...  Now tat i done some OC and tested in a few hardwares... i notice tat cheaper performance RAMs doesn't give tat much of edge to higher level OCers... but hey... they are still cheap... actually i wanted to order the Mushkin HP or Redline series but Mushkin haven't start importing those yet...  even EM series also very limited which can be found in Low Yat which is also quite rare... wait until my next Hdd arrive then i can start assembling my old parts into my 2ndary rig... for "downloading" purpose... and see E2160 wif Corsair XMS2 1GB(2x512MB) kit DDR667 n my 1 year old GA-965P-DS4... This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Aug 14 2007, 04:19 AM |
|
|
Aug 15 2007, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 14 2007, 07:55 AM) you don't get what i mean. err... no... actually 667 can also go up to 1000... wait until i rebuild my BT rig from my old parts than i show u... already have a E2160 at hand... now it's a matter of my next HDD... of course we all know DDR2 800 can go even more, but point is i don't need it already when my DDR2 667 can already do DDR2 900 speed.  Hynix, Samsung, Micron & Mushkin shouldn't have much problem wif tat...n i came to realize tat either my mobo, proc or temp is bottlenecking my OC... my RAM can't seem to go higher than this at the same timing... This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Aug 15 2007, 12:47 AM |
|
|
Aug 16 2007, 11:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 15 2007, 01:42 AM) aih you ah. i'm not here to say how far it can go la cos i'm just talking about MY RAM. bro... ur RAM chip is Hynix leh... not easy to get leh... should be able to climb higher... furthermore it depends on chip. for now i'm just happy to see mine touch DDR2 900.  i remember only the DDR533 easy to get D9 and Hynix chips... but now majority also Winbond or AM... |
|
|
Aug 16 2007, 11:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(rainingzero @ Aug 13 2007, 05:02 AM) mind defind the terms below?? Celeron 347 3GHz still selling at Low Yat... u can check out their pricelist... *Cedar Mill = Celeron 3 series *Conroe = Core 2 Duo *Conroe-L = Celeron 4 series... i only know there are prescott, cedar mill, allandale and conroe. dunno about conroe-L, celeron 3 and 4 series.... Celeron 420 1.6GHz... is a replacement to Celeron 347... basically it's based on Intel Core architecture wif 1 core less and less cache... |
|
|
Aug 17 2007, 09:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Aug 17 2007, 01:57 PM) I think nowadays should at least go for dual core for basic gaming and multitasking coz already tried celeron D 347 on Vista, quite annoying. are u sure...? how much RAM u squeeze in...? i got no problems wif 347... it's a great RM150 Proc for me... even outperform AMD X2 3800+ in super_PI... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0419sec
 0.22
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 01:17 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.