Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
138 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140/E2160/E2180 Thread, Discussion & Compilation

views
     
a1098113
post Jan 19 2008, 08:18 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


not just cpu cooler, as u go higher even NB cooling is important. Most vital is to use the Lowest Vcore possible for the clock, of course stable. For helping with cooling.
rozz_1291
post Jan 19 2008, 09:48 PM

Semi N/A
*****
Senior Member
861 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Bangsar


QUOTE(tesla_rage @ Jan 19 2008, 04:51 PM)
63C for everyday use is a little high, really.

from ur sig, when is ur WC set arriving? things can get more interesting then smile.gif
*
My WC will arrive maybe between Monday or Friday..... Yup, i know.... things can get more interesting.... brows.gif Dats y i can't wait... rclxm9.gif


Added on January 19, 2008, 9:49 pm
QUOTE(skymyxe @ Jan 19 2008, 05:17 PM)
63C is 100% load rite, not idle  hmm.gif
*
ofcourse full load.... If on idle, then full load is..... shocking.gif


Added on January 19, 2008, 9:52 pm
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jan 19 2008, 07:45 PM)
Congratulations smile.gif Maybe it's time to go for 3.2Ghz
*
Will try.... n will post da result soon..... nod.gif


Thanks 2 ur Hynix chips brows.gif laugh.gif


Added on January 19, 2008, 9:55 pm
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jan 19 2008, 07:20 PM)
@all

yes 60+ is alright but still high.. you should get around 50+ at load coz i get 60+ at load overclocking my e2140 at 3.44Ghz.

I agree with sky.. sky is learning fast
*
Well then, juz hav 2 wait for my WC 2 arrive.... sad.gif Then will try Oc it higher.... maybe above 3.4....

Juz curious laa.... no 1 else is running da E2180 kaa...??? unsure.gif I c most is 2140 n 2160.... If got 218, post laa sum result. Wanna c....

Oo.. yea, 1 more thing, my vcore is @ 1.36v=3.0ghz. Wats my limits if i wanna OC higher??? icon_question.gif Bcuz if below 1.35v @ 3.0, i get BSOD...... N i takut might blow things up.... shocking.gif laugh.gif



notworthy.gif icon_rolleyes.gif


Added on January 19, 2008, 10:15 pm
QUOTE(skymyxe @ Jan 19 2008, 07:59 PM)
Better cooler will help increase your OCing by reducing load temperature.  nod.gif
*
Yup,getting 1. C my sig. sweat.gif N i luv those TX-2 wub.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by rozz_1291: Jan 19 2008, 10:15 PM
skymyxe
post Jan 19 2008, 10:33 PM

Enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,047 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: GKL/KV


QUOTE(rozz_1291 @ Jan 19 2008, 09:48 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Seems like with TX-2 and aluminium Stock Intel HSF you manage to get 63C on load. That makes me think will I get the same results using the E2160 + aluminium Stock Intel HSF too? hmm.gif

It was at 55C on idle. OC it until 3Ghz and it went 83C shocking.gif
rozz_1291
post Jan 19 2008, 10:36 PM

Semi N/A
*****
Senior Member
861 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Bangsar


QUOTE(skymyxe @ Jan 19 2008, 10:33 PM)
Seems like with TX-2 and aluminium Stock Intel HSF you manage to get 63C on load. That makes me think will I get the same results using the E2160 + aluminium Stock Intel HSF too?  hmm.gif 

It was at 55C on idle. OC it until 3Ghz and it went 83C  shocking.gif
*
Hahaha...... laugh.gif get 1 lar... not expensive wat, chaeper than MX-2.... Wow.... 83c on full load @3ghz shocking.gif Wats da VCore???
akachester
post Jan 19 2008, 11:09 PM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


Tried to boot my system today with 350 * 8 (2.8Ghz) and 1053Mhz 4-4-4-12 today and it works..

Load temperature is about 45c on MX-2 and AC7Pro. Is that good? Is there any program i could use to test the stability at this setting?
rozz_1291
post Jan 19 2008, 11:19 PM

Semi N/A
*****
Senior Member
861 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Bangsar


QUOTE(akachester @ Jan 19 2008, 11:09 PM)
Tried to boot my system today with 350 * 8 (2.8Ghz) and 1053Mhz 4-4-4-12 today and it works..

Load temperature is about 45c on MX-2 and AC7Pro. Is that good? Is there any program i could use to test the stability at this setting?
*
If it is full load @ 45, then it ok..... If u run a stress test, then u will know wheather its stable or not.....

How bout taking it to 3.0ghz..... hmm.gif Evrything seems ok..... nod.gif




icon_rolleyes.gif
skymyxe
post Jan 20 2008, 12:00 AM

Enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,047 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: GKL/KV


QUOTE(rozz_1291 @ Jan 19 2008, 10:36 PM)
Hahaha...... laugh.gif  get 1 lar... not expensive wat, chaeper than MX-2.... Wow.... 83c on full load @3ghz shocking.gif  Wats da VCore???
*
Yeah, surprisingly high coz the idle temperature already high at 55C. I was just wanna banish the aluminium Stock Intel HSF until saw that you manage to get yours with TX-2 with a very good temperature I must say. hmm.gif

The VCore was at 1.375V so it considered as high too. Willing to try the TX-2 and hope it'll help reduce the temperature significantly. Btw, mind asking here how is your airflow inside the casing. The one I'm testing was kinda awful as only have intake at the side and exhaust at the rear. Both are 80mm and are not performance casing fans so the CFM is rather poor. sweat.gif
rozz_1291
post Jan 20 2008, 12:30 AM

Semi N/A
*****
Senior Member
861 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Bangsar


hah.... exzactly da same like mine..... side in rear out..... But both r very strong airflow....
a1098113
post Jan 20 2008, 12:31 AM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


hmm airflow plays a huge role for cooling and even a case closed can increase temps by 3 degrees lol. This is what i faced. So when i OC i open the side panel and do it.

Aluminium is ALumimium. Even if u used tx-2, the temp difference wont significantly improve your performance of the cooling.
rozz_1291
post Jan 20 2008, 12:45 AM

Semi N/A
*****
Senior Member
861 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Bangsar


Then, i will try leave my side panel open....... N c da result...
hazairi
post Jan 20 2008, 09:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,694 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


Guys, I tried to overclock my dual core cpu from 2.2Ghz to 2.67Ghz (800Mhz FSB) (20% OC). I'm using Asus' P5KPL Intel G31 mobo with maximum of 1333Mhz FSB and 1Gb Kingston DDR2 RAM running at 667Mhz. I'm using a standard cooling system. Any suggestion on what's the maximum speed for me to OC using this normal cooling system?
skymyxe
post Jan 20 2008, 11:15 AM

Enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,047 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: GKL/KV


QUOTE(hazairi @ Jan 20 2008, 09:08 AM)
Guys, I tried to overclock my dual core cpu from 2.2Ghz to 2.67Ghz (800Mhz FSB) (20% OC). I'm using Asus' P5KPL Intel G31 mobo with maximum of 1333Mhz FSB and 1Gb Kingston DDR2 RAM running at 667Mhz. I'm using a standard cooling system. Any suggestion on what's the maximum speed for me to OC using this normal cooling system?
*
Try to OC your CPU without increasing the VCore. Get a stable speed and monitor the temperature. Gradually increase your bus speed and VCore if it can't boot. Again monitor your temperature. There's no fix speed on stock cooling. It depends on many things such as ambient, airflow and so on. The best is not to exceed 65C on 100% load test. Then you'll be fine with your system. icon_rolleyes.gif
hazairi
post Jan 20 2008, 11:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,694 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(skymyxe @ Jan 20 2008, 11:15 AM)
Try to OC your CPU without increasing the VCore. Get a stable speed and monitor the temperature. Gradually increase your bus speed and VCore if it can't boot. Again monitor your temperature. There's no fix speed on stock cooling. It depends on many things such as ambient, airflow and so on. The best is not to exceed 65C on 100% load test. Then you'll be fine with your system.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
gee..
thanks much for the advice.. smile.gif


Added on January 20, 2008, 11:33 amOne more thing.. If I really do success to OC it very high.. I'm afraid there'll be a long term effects? Wouldnt it?

This post has been edited by hazairi: Jan 20 2008, 11:35 AM
skymyxe
post Jan 20 2008, 01:49 PM

Enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,047 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: GKL/KV


QUOTE(hazairi @ Jan 20 2008, 11:30 AM)
gee..
thanks much for the advice.. smile.gif


Added on January 20, 2008, 11:33 amOne more thing.. If I really do success to OC it very high.. I'm afraid there'll be a long term effects? Wouldnt it?
*
Long term in 10 years? Maybe. But I assume you ain't going to use the same processor for more than 3 years. If you monitor and maintain your CPU and system properly, then you shouldn't have to worry bout it. Only if it is running at really high temperature then it'll damage the processor. icon_rolleyes.gif
hazairi
post Jan 20 2008, 02:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,694 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


Hmm.. thanks
a1098113
post Jan 20 2008, 02:46 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


cooling plays a vital role in longevity of the processor, also remember that try not to push beyond 1.5V so u prevent frying lol.
DevilMan
post Jan 20 2008, 02:58 PM

==[ Hardware Swinger ]==
****
Senior Member
653 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Originated From Hell. Status: Lazy.





Guys, which one OC better 2140/60/80.
price its all okie with me. Thinking to get 2100 series and buy x38 or x48 and later buy quaddies. drool.gif drool.gif drool.gif
a1098113
post Jan 20 2008, 03:00 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


well a tough one.. though i would really stick to the choice of stepping though. 2140 is great, so is 2160. since i believe some of us here have a database of the two procs above. NOte sharing would be good if you bought the same. Just make sure its M0 stepping
DevilMan
post Jan 20 2008, 03:04 PM

==[ Hardware Swinger ]==
****
Senior Member
653 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Originated From Hell. Status: Lazy.




QUOTE(a1098113 @ Jan 20 2008, 03:00 PM)
well a tough one.. though i would really stick to the choice of stepping though. 2140 is great, so is 2160. since i believe some of us here have a database of the two procs above. NOte sharing would be good if you bought the same. Just make sure its M0 stepping
*
so in a way 2180 should be okie as the multiplier is more as long its m0?
sorry not so good with intel, my las intel was e6300.
a1098113
post Jan 20 2008, 03:18 PM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


yeah the stepping is essential for overclocking. I think E2180 is a confirmed M0. i am just like you too laugh.gif always learning!

This post has been edited by a1098113: Jan 20 2008, 03:19 PM

138 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0194sec    0.20    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 12:41 PM