LGBTQ is fucked up. If you want to legalize it then legalize zoophillia and incest too. Add pedophillia too while you're at it.

I don't need to come up with new when there's no good argument against it yet. They're all taboo because big imaginary guy in the sky says it's bad. And what good is mutual consent when the concept of statutory rape exist.

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 10:17 AM

Do you? Some countries allows 11-12 to be the age of consent. Just because the law says so makes it automatically correct?

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 10:24 AM

Why does it okay if they were both kids, and not if one party is adult? The 12 year old is going to get married and having sex either way in that scenario. Is it because you find it disgusting? Is it because you've been taught by society that it's gross?

Congratulations for missing the point.

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 11:33 AM

yea sure buddy

I already made a point about this. To add to that, it's because sex is taught as bad to kids when sexual violence is what actually the negative aspect and cause trauma. Why teach kids that sex is bad for 18 years but then suddenly tell them sex is actually natural and healthy when they crossed their 18th birthday? The determination for age of consent is loosely based on cultural morality. There's no "mental test" actually implemented. If you want to determine through brain maturity then the real age of consent for everybody is 25 years old. Why isn't that the standard age then? Not just for sex for but other matured life decisions like smoking, drinking,driving, etc.

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 12:38 PM

Bullshit what? I never said I'm okay or that it's right for underage kids to have sex or get married. And that age of consent change doesn't contradict my point. Cultural morality is filmsy and the fact that people keep changing it doesn't give it any credibility.

Did you not read the part where I said there's no actual mental test whatsoever to determine the age of consent? It's quite literally determined by cultural morality. The way you feel that it's baffling to even discuss that it might be okay to fuck a child is how I feel about lgbtq. Because when you breakdown the logic and reasoning of society it's all fugazi.

God also allows psychopaths, pedophiles and zoophiles to exist. Does that mean we should just let them do what they want?

I have talked about consent with another user. Maybe you should read them. But let's talk about another example shall we? Something sexual that also involves consent. Cuckoldry. Cuckoldry is no joke, it's one of the most prevailing sex life practice that exist. Cuckoldry of course happens with consent from all three parties. But that does make it okay? I have no respect or tolerance to any cucks. They are subhumans and deserve to be shamed and humiliated. I don't care how much they are suffering inside because they don't get to see their wife having sex with another man. They can suffer for all I care. There's nothing in the world you can say to me that'll make me accept that lifestyle, no matter how personal it is. Projecting someone as insecure because they don't stand homosexuality is a weak argument. I'd say the same to you, why are you so against pedophiles? They didn't ask to be born to be attracted to children. So why are you so against them, are you insecure?

you didn't read what I posted about age of consent did you? You can easily find footage of animals voluntarily having sex with people without being forced.

can you? how do you know if the animals that zoophiles use are suffering, can you read their minds?
Age of consent and homosexuality are both taboo at it's core. Once you dissect them there's really no reason to allow one but not the other.

Elaborate.

If you think that was my argument then you really didn't understand my point.

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 07:04 PM

Yes I'm not gonna be sorry for being hateful to shitty and wrongdoings. lgbtq aren't a threat? They actively spread their ideology, social media has allowed the western lgbtq ideology to quickly spread worldwide, social media has enabled a lot of stupidity.

The concept of allowing degenaracy just because there's consent is a weak argument that is purely backed on virtue signaling. You want me to breakdown the immorality of two human of the same sex being sexually intimate, which is why I compare homosexuality to pedophillia or incest. Pedophillia? Teach kids sex education at young age. lgbtq is primarily driven by the west, and in the west they are ok with normalizing kids in school to have active sex life. People have done research, they are all dismissed of course because it's a huge taboo. Incest? What's wrong with two consenting adults wanting to be in a relationship? Danger of retardation? Practice safe sex and it's all a-ok. Adoption is a choice. Human brain have mechanism to avoid inbreeding? Well if people can bypass mother nature's evolution mehcanism of avoiding non-offspring producing relationship then we wouldn't be talking about homosexuality.



Right and wrong has a long history of anthropology, homosexuality used to be a barbaric practice alongside incest,pedophilia, and zoophilia. It belongs in the dark ages.

This post has been edited by hyperwavedrift: Jan 13 2020, 09:09 PM