Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Bezza😍 car sifu come in thanks

views
     
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 05:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
1.3 Turbo?
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 06:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(cyc85 @ Jan 3 2020, 06:15 PM)
Why cannot use phone? Got bluetooth handsfree right? Can make call and stream music.
ASA 2.0 is a extra tool to prevent accident from happen.
*
Can't use in heavy rain
Can't use if got strong direct sunlight
Can't use in the fog
Can't use at night if poor illumination
Can't use when looking at a plain wall (pedal misoperation control)
Can't detect lorry trailers

Basically in the conditions when you need it the most, it doesn't work.

When Perodua implements radar-based driving assist, then that's something worth talking about.

This post has been edited by dares: Jan 3 2020, 06:28 PM
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 08:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(aquos @ Jan 3 2020, 07:40 PM)
Persona rear leg room is very bad. Worse than axia.
*
This is because the Persona seats, front and rear, are more substantial than Bezza's. Notably thigh support, if you go sit in both cars, the Persona seats has much better thigh support than the Axia/Bezza's. The front seat backrests are also thicker. All these comes at the cost of cabin space.

Also, Axia/Bezza's rear seats are more upright, further reducing the footprint of the seats.

Like many Japanese small car makers, Perodua use these packaging methods to create the look of a spacious cabin at the expense of seat comfort. There is no right and wrong, but it is incorrect to write it off as simply having bad legroom without considering that is because the Persona has much better seats, and that is something that's more important than a few cm less legroom.

This post has been edited by dares: Jan 3 2020, 08:08 PM
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 09:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(AllnGap @ Jan 3 2020, 08:47 PM)
Seriously you should go make own YouTube channel.
I confirm support you
*
Tenkiu for sappork but I sked kena reported to Youtube for inappropriate content coz my face too ugly sad.gif

QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 3 2020, 09:04 PM)
And when will it work? I'm puzzled...
*
When playing phone while driving in traffic jam in the direction facing away from the sun....

The direct sunlight limitation probably more applicable in the morning and evening when the sun is nearer to the horizon.

It is basically like your eyes....if the driving conditions are in such a way your vision of the road is impaired, high chance that the cameras are impaired too. Other additional limitations such as cannot recognize lorry trailers and motorbikes/bicycles.
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 10:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 3 2020, 09:44 PM)
How about Honda sensing and Proton ADAS?
*
Both system use millimeter wave radar, external sensors and complemented with cameras - much more reliable, robust and have longer range compared to using just cameras. Of course, they are also more expensive.

This is why X70 have adaptive cruise control but Myvi/Aruz/Axia/Bezza doesn't....

This post has been edited by dares: Jan 3 2020, 10:03 PM
dares
post Jan 3 2020, 10:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(pikacu @ Jan 3 2020, 10:11 PM)
"to prevent" is a strong word

what the maximum speed that asa 2.0 eill stay active? it was 35km/h for asa 1.0
*
ASA 2.0 Pre-collision braking work from 4kmh - 80kmh for cars and 4kmh - 50kmh for pedestrians.

In both cases, from 4kmh-30kmh it can prevent a collision. From 30kmh onwards it cannot prevent it completely, but will try to slow the car enough to reduce the damage.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0169sec    0.80    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:48 PM