Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> I am so sicked of those calling menghapuskan SRJK

views
     
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 08:54 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Jan 2 2020, 08:42 AM)
SJKC is not a prob at all but it could be better with just a single stream of education that focus on eng and bahasa as national language, while chinese and tamil as elective.

I am a chinese and i am proud to be able to talk, write and read our national language, cause I am a malaysian. My knowledge with mandarin is limited, but do i feel a shame or bad? No cause i am a malaysian chinese.

Nowadays, even 60 years old uncle auttie can speak better bahasa than the pure chinese school youngster. How are they going to create harmony with tue malay or other races if they cant converse in Bahasa properly, not to mention to mix around with the malay?

I do not agree hapuskan srjk, but up the kebangsaan school standard is the solution.
*
There was a time where all public schools used English for maths and science. And briefly we had experience a single stream system. But guess who ended up falling behind and reset everything. laugh.gif
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 09:08 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(genecode @ Jan 2 2020, 09:03 AM)
Or this way also good.
Instead abolish vernacular. upgrade it to teach BM and compulsory BM to all vernacular schools so that all grad from vern school speak better BM than those in SK. this way, we abolish SK and SMK instead. and chg SRJK name to SRK. either way, the main purpose is for unity, and for kids of multi races be friends with each other from small.
*
90s kids will know... we had this with English instead but was taken down because certain group not catching up laugh.gif
https://www.asiaone.com/News/Education/Stor...709-153653.html

We progressed... but ended up taking a huge step backwards.. and now blaming the system that was re-introduced.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 09:11 AM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 09:21 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Jan 2 2020, 09:11 AM)
I am the 90s kid and i am sad how it turn up.
Now my kids who hardly know bm in srjk is just sad.
I have to give personal extra class for them in bm to make them malaysian.
*
Actually thanks to that of teaching Science and Maths in English, the fluency of both English and BM is pretty high among the 90s kids. Especially those from SRJK. Welp the gov back then intended to ruin this advantage by reverting a decade long system and i guess they are pretty successful at creating this chaos we have today.

So.... i am pretty sure that changing all Science and Maths to BM would create a similar outcome as before and would once again ironically reduce that so called advantage (For IPTA). That's why with such an obvious solution, yet they only thought of abolishing SJK.... clearly unifying and creating an equal playing field was never their main goal.
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 09:38 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Jan 2 2020, 09:25 AM)
Exactly, dont you feel weird learning science in chinese, pr learning computer in chinese or srjk student? In malaysia?
*
SRJKC was kinda happy to oblige the teaching of Science and Maths in English actually. You dont hear much complains back then because no doubt it is beneficial for the kids and they took the ministry's decision well.

And then after a decade the ministry made them switch their syllabus back to their respective language. It was dictated by the ministry and not the SRJK.

However you'd be surprised that those higher performing SRJKC schools would do afterschool classes and have a special subject for English in Science and Maths or even using Singapork's English syllabus to teach..... to 90s kids, raise your hand if you remember these colourful striped text books rclxms.gif (I guess it's mainly to aid their top classes's students to nail the ASEAN scholarship programme offered by singkie)
user posted image

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 09:39 AM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 11:36 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(loserguy @ Jan 2 2020, 11:08 AM)
I am a Malaysian Chinese. I think Chinese and Indians have been conned by their politicians for decades. Are there any advantages to SJK other than syok sendiri? Preferential entry to universities, extra scholarships, higher allocations from the government? What are the tangible benefits that we get by staying as SJK?

What is the difference if you rename SJK (C/T) <Contoh> into SK <Contoh> ? The teachers and the students are still the same.
*
The SJK and SK at one point were all teaching everything in English with BM as a compulsory subject on the same syllabus and Mandarin and Tamil as extra. It wasnt MCA/DAP/MIC who scrapped this but UMNO laugh.gif This single language stream has been around for the entirety of 2002~2012 so I'll assume that you're either too old or too young to notice this.

And also is there actually a SJK for secondary school? i thought it was primary school jer....... even the well known chunghwa public and kuncheng secondary school in KL teach the syllabus in BM while doing an extra mandarin subject for SPM. So i dont think that 6 years of vernacular education in primary school leaves any huge impact at all...

And that those Chinese who cant speak BM properly are plainly just suck in studies.. I'm pretty sure their mandarin also sucks balls and they actually speak mostly Cantonese/Hokkien.


Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 02:56 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 02:51 PM)
I am not saying Mandarin is useless. Mandarin is good if you’re aspiring to work for PRC company. But other than that, mandarin has not much use.

I am just dismissing your idea of making Mandarin compulsory to malaysian, not dissing the languages.

I have worked in one cinapek company, two local public listed companies, one British company, one french company and one german company. None of them requires me to speak Mandarin. Heck, even those is cinapek company don’t speak mandarin, they all speak hokkien.
*
no doubt mandarin is advantageous ... but i dont think we should force it to be compulsory especially in Malaysia. Afterall many kids are struggling to keep up with that many subjects already... even with 2 language they can barely manage.

And also why want to share the pie brows.gif if everyone speaks mandarin then there'll be no more advantage for mandarin speakers in the job hunt laugh.gif.


We should pretty much go back to 2002 and use that teaching of Science and Maths in English Moral studies in BM. retain the SJK for their additional language class for parents who thinks their kids can cope with the extra language. The rest can just go SK.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 03:00 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 03:26 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 03:08 PM)
Not sure. But my boss said he don’t know mandarin because he went to SK. I guess pure hokkien then.
This is true. No doubt you have higher chances to work in PRC company if you know mandarin, but most malaysian are struggling to master 2 languages, you wanted them to learn 3rd one which has no use to them.

I can understand three languages too because i learned arab in school. But do you think learning arab has any benefit to me? No. Because i am not in oil and gas industry. It was kind of waste learning arab in school. Should have taken japanese instead.
*
True that. that's why those that cant speak proper BM/English but converse in mandarin daily.. their mandarin is actually at the level of Bahasa rempit to BM speakers. Having worked with Taiwanese and PRCs.. they admitted that they can never fully understand daily malaysian mandarin which turns out to be a rojak of slangs from dialects and a grammatical nightmare laugh.gif. When there's too many things to focus, they'll end up mastering nothing.

Well it's always good to have additional knowledge but we have to make sure the kids are truly competent with English at the very least before adding more ingredients to the soup.
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 03:35 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 03:27 PM)
Lol. Happened to colleague of mine also, but from other department, kononnya want to speak mandarin to PRC people when he came down to Malaysia, but the Guangzhou born manager replied to him in English laugh.gif

I guess you colleague mandarin level is rempit level. Like most people here who speaks primarily BM but at rempit level, ask them to write official report/letter/documents in BM, grammar and vocabs all over the place.
*
It's a simple formula really.... as a student, if they cant be fluent in a compulsory language such as BM and English, What is there to say about their mandarin level... which coincidentally is one of the most difficult language to learn. laugh.gif ... and in the same context.. those SK dudes should also look in the mirror about their BM. Speaking bahasa pasar is not fluency lmao.
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 04:40 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(aliesterfiend @ Jan 2 2020, 03:54 PM)
Indeed. That's why I am sceptical when one of the supposed main reason for hiring mandarin speakers is said to be because of dealing with business from China. I dont know about those cinapek company but my experience with MNC was the other way around.
*
When it is a required criteria, they will expect to see some level of fluency like read and write.. or perhaps a supporting SPM result... usually can judge through interview.


QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 03:59 PM)
Yeah. Tell that to those racist lowlifes in FB. Write in bahasa rempit that even I don’t understand tapi ada hati nak kutuk non-malay’s proficiency in BM.
But me on the other hand, A in arab in PMR, A1 in BM and English in SPM, so i have the right to kutuk other people’s language proficiency laugh.gif
So i guess learning mandarin in SJK is overrated for chinese speaking people. Only good for non-chinese.
*
Sending kids to SJK especially SJKC is not entirely for the mandarin language (afterall from 2002-2012 the teaching medium for science and maths were english). The main purpose is actually for the learning motivation and the teaching environment which is culturally similar to schools in east asia.. where their goal is to excel in exams. Almost every high performing SJKC in KL will have after school classes to further boost the main UPSR subjects and perform hours of revision on past year questions to better prepare the kids for the actual exam.

Comparatively, SJKC is so competitive that the top scorers for UPSR will even be rewarded, in some schools ... with cash from the PIBG's fund. im not joking lol...... And there will be alot of emphasis on the top classes where they are given alot of private opportunities to join competitions or apply scholarships especially the ASEAN scholarship where they will send a batch of promising students every year to take the qualifying exam.

SJKC will always use these achievements to get more students because with minimal funding from the ministry to maintain their school, they survive on "donations" and that the future of the school lies on the student's headcount.

These additional opportunities and initiatives that you dont usually see in SK is what made SJKC stand out.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 04:50 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 05:02 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(ramboramsey @ Jan 2 2020, 04:51 PM)
Sure or not? Ever heard of SK Bukit Jelutong? SK Tun Syed? SK Bukit Damansara? These schools compete at international level, be in arts, science or maths. And dont start with MRSM and SBP like STAR MCKK SAS TKC even RMC boys excel in music arts robotic debate sports. They even play rugby with angmoh, win gold medal in robotic and invention comp, perform band wind orchestra in europe japan at world level competition.
*
of course i do, my highschool have many that came from one of the schools you mentioned .. but you also cannot rule out the sheer number of SJKCs that equally have a good streak of academic and co-curricular achievements. Not to mention the entry criteria to SJKC is not as difficult... and that they're all just average schools.

But got to note that not all SJKC are good also... deswai some SJKC with the same name but diff campus, one will be favored more than the other eventhough they are side by side.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 05:08 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 05:14 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(xecton @ Jan 2 2020, 05:08 PM)
Another reason why I oppose chinese schools.
*
good mar... good at producing engineers, lawyers, medicine and finance people. Where the skill at reading, digest and vomit on exam papers will help them to get their papers brows.gif increasing our country's occupational technical skill level the quicker way... provided they dont jump to another country.
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 05:45 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 05:20 PM)
Well I came from the best school in Kelantan but not SJK, so i can’t speak on behalf of not so performing SK.

But SK vs SJK in term of performance, just like Canon vs Nikon argument. Lower end model one brand might perform better than the other and vice versa for high end model.

In Kelantan, the “high end model”, SK always win, top school like SIC, Ahmad Maher, Naim Lil Banat is consistently better than SMJK Chung Hwa. Not sure about low end school though. And I can’t speak about school in other state too.
*
location i suppose.. like KL area are usually dominated by SJKC in terms of sheer numbers of performing schools.

But then again, the overall performance of public schools including SJKCs are dropping also nowadays... as the more gifted/privileged children are enrolled in international schools/home schooling already. Some SJKCs cant even fill up the class rooms lately.

QUOTE(Namelessone1973 @ Jan 2 2020, 05:29 PM)
This is the reason why Chinese schools are no longer the school of choice for some Chinese parents. They are too academic focus and any student who can't cope with such a system will be left behind. We always see the glory side of Chinese schools but never realize that there are a lot of failures too.

I have a friend who send his daughter to Chinese school and she was miserable for 6 years from standard 1 to 6. She was always in the weaker student class where she was neglected. Her academic results were terrible and she hated going to school. After standard 6, she was homeschooled and by the time she reach university, her results were excellent. My friend show me some of the assignments she do when she was in form 1 age and I was impressed. Homeschool gave her the freedom to study at her own pace and to her strength.
*
Because Homeschooling there is a lower student to teacher ratio and so more attention can be given to each student's performance... so when the kid cant keep up, the rest of the class will adjust the pace. But cant expect the same for a class of 50 students to do the same.

but then you can not compare it that way also because the cost is not a joke laugh.gif but this is also why the gap is getting ridiculously big.. the rich keeps getting smarter and richer while the poor just remained the same.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 05:56 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 2 2020, 06:10 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(sanwaltz @ Jan 2 2020, 05:41 PM)
is it really true that SRJK has less funding (in terms of absolute ringgit per number of student) from federal? Has anyone has real statistic data to backup this statement?

or its just a case of perception where, they felt injustice by having better academic result while at the same time receiving same amount of funding with other SRKs.

or that better academic results can be sustained only if there are external donations from parents?

Have you seen SRKs in kampungs?
*
normally the disparity in terms on funding is for land, building maintenance costs and equipment. Administratively, the teachers are all paid by the gov so that's why SJKC will always have a PIBG who will do fund raising and collect donations or do extra afterschool tuition from parents to maintain the school.... Another known method is by investing on building a multi purpose school hall which they will rent to the outside for badminton booking, wedding dinners or even general events and fairs. I dont think there's an actual data because it is not transparent back in the BN days but i can say the funding is so shitty that timidandslow's 300K FD is more than double what some SJKC received. (source: parent is guru besar of SRJKC) I remembered there was a year the school received a 4x 32" TV and and a dozen of crappy computers as the "funding" and the school was like wtf can we do with these shit.

That's why academic achievement is important as they rely on headcount unless they have a school hall.

Meanwhile.. if you drive along kampung areas like PD and melaka... those SRKs are daaaaaayuuuuuummmmnnnnn.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 2 2020, 06:13 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 12:13 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 2 2020, 07:06 PM)
I don’t know about normal school in KL, but i think boarding school like SSP, ASIS, KISAS, SAS are much better than any SJK you can name.
*
cuz you’re taking these elite and selected high performance school that is monitored by the ministry that are heavily funded with state of the art facilities vs the standard SJKCs which is underfunded, out on their own and has a mixed quality of students yet performs better than average.

and the schools you mentioned are all secondary schools.. i didnt know there’s a SJK in secondary level.. because even the infamous chunghwa in KL is an SMK.

Altho a fair amount of SRJKC actually set their goals to push the kids to enter those said schools with their UPSR result. Which is why they’re so academic oriented and many did succeed... but mainly the goal back in my time was ASEAN scholarship.
Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 12:28 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(dead_psycho @ Jan 2 2020, 08:23 PM)
At the end of the day, the richer have better opportunity for better education than the poor. The poor can only resort to govt school, like it or not.

If I have money, I will send my kid to international school as well.
*
that’s the sad truth. laugh.gif even then the poor also has too many distractions from studying properly.
Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 09:30 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 3 2020, 08:57 AM)
Yeah. Like i said, if you compare top end of SMK vs SMJK, SMK most of the time win hands down. Heavily funded? I’m not sure. Maybe the fund was songlapped. State of the art facilities? No. Biasa2 je. But one this for sure, the teachers are the best of the best. Because if you’re a teacher and you’re transferred to those school, it means that the ministry recognized you as top teacher already.

And like i mentioned those top school in Kelantan, the admission criteria is all As in UPSR (there is backdoor way too if you know someone, well, this is malaysia).

And in Kelantan, Chung Hwa is SMJK.

I used to believe SJK produced good student too. Until I started working in SJK majority industry, only 10% are up to my standard, brain wise. Salary and position wise, they can up faster because their bosses pity them for being oppressed by the ketuanan melayu even they are not competent. Truth is ketuanan melayu is having minimal benefits to salaryman, financially.
*
didnt know there’s actually a SMJK because i thought vernacular is up till darjah 6.... at least for KL.. where the SRJK are all refered as SJK here.

that makes this comparison a little off because what ive been talking about are primary SRJKC schools where there’s no entry criteria yet. And students these SRJKC school produced are meant to go for those top SMK by pushing for A’s in UPSR. This strict and focused goal is what most poorer parents look for.

Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 11:12 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 3 2020, 10:59 AM)
My school last time was competing at top of the table. We don’t care much about mid table team.
In front of my SRK was SRJKC Peir Chih. The 2-3 years i was following the UPSR result during my time, my school always perform better. But that was an unfair comparison because you can’t compare camry to city. Should compare camry to accord. But that time i do not know which school was the accord of SRJKC in Kelantan. The competitive spirit wasn’t there until i enter secondary school.
*
Welp, i guess it's location... and not quite fair to compare kelantan to kl as well.

in KL, top SRJKCs are always competing among each other. while the SRJKT and SRK makan popcorn at the side. laugh.gif you go any junior competition, be it gov hosted or private, you will see waves of them participating.... to the point of hiring special coaches and stuff lel... apart from sports, special coaching includes cheer-leading, gymrama, lego robotics, school marching band etc ... and even trololol ones like cups stacking and rubics cube also they participate.


QUOTE(toda_erika_II @ Jan 3 2020, 11:00 AM)
Wow. I was thinking of traditional homeschool, either private teacher is hired or tutored by own parents at home,and then take public exam.
*
New trend nowadays.. especially among the well to do. It's now more like a mini international school.
Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 12:01 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Jan 3 2020, 11:37 AM)
I guess safe to say SRJKC is better in rich states where salary is good like KL, Selangor, Penang & maybe Johor. Other than that, the statement of “SRJKC produce better student” isn’t applicable.

I know the reason why. Private school.

Rich malays in those states mostly prefer to send their kids to private school or international school. So the composition of students in SK mainly kids with not so rich parents, busy looking for money to feed the family. Most of the parents don’t have time to teach their kids anything at home and end up the parents pushing all the responsibility to the teachers. And most of parents sending kids to SK have a minimum of half a dozen of kids, so the time is even limited for each kid. So they end up producing kids with lack of drive and lack of interest and lack of attention. And it reflect to the kids performance in school.

I am a busy father too. I only have 3 hours to spend with my kids on weekdays, which why i limit myself to 2 kids only. So i could spend my time more with my kids.

SK performing better in poorer states because nobody send their kids to private school. So most of top kids are in govt school. And not to mentioned parents in poorer state have more time to spend with their kids, as a result, their kids do better in school.
*
hmmm actually it kinda make sense now.

SRJKC in rich states do kinda behave like a private school... because it is not as closely monitored by the gov and they have some form of autonomy as they are actually run by the PIBG.

almost all would teach additional syllabus (mostly from SG) on top of the standard syllabus afterschool... keeping the kids in school till 4pm for morning session and the kids from afternoon session have to come to school at 8am for the extra classes. this was actually the practice since even from my time.

Busy parents especially those working class will like this system. because it aligns well with their working hours and that they can just leave their kids in school the whole day... like a cheap daycare... deswai more and more malays especially in KL can speak mandarin now laugh.gif

I guess this played a role at setting the bar really high for SRJKC in the cities. Meanwhile SRJKC in kampung... i suppose there's no advantage and infact are slower than SRKs because the kids are burdened by learning an extra language following the same time table as SRKs

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jan 3 2020, 12:08 PM
Bonchi
post Jan 3 2020, 12:41 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(ahpoo @ Jan 3 2020, 11:24 AM)
change vernacular school to teach chinese/indian languange, religion or culture only...similar to sekolah agama..

absorb all those teachers teaching main subjects from vernacular school into national school..so students morning go to national school afternoon go sekolah agama/culture...same as what the malay have been doing...

allowing vernacular schools was a mistake by the old2 government...time to fixed it and tighten our national unity...got to start with the young...the old already ego and stubborn, hard to to change their racist mind set..
*
the old gov actually made English the teaching medium regardless of national/vernacular school for brief 10 years... BM compulsory while chinese and indian language became additional...... people started to see some hope in our education standards.... aaaaaaaand then they reverted everything back to where it was. trolololol

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0321sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:33 PM