Murica is the place where ppl also said:
1. Never landed the moon
2. Flat earth
3. Big foot
4. Aliens and crop circles
5. Etc

Ahh the first 5 star retard sheep

"Pipu also SAID"

no scientific backing kek

This one got

Unless u think ure smarter

N that all the architech n enginners are worng

Kek

This post has been edited by nasilemaksedap: Nov 20 2019, 10:32 PM

so many people layan that retard troll...

Oh so ure the first retard my bad

2008 but still so ham ka ling bodo

So all the evident presented by the architech n enginners are wrong?

Kek

Oh yeah u still havent answer me how a fire above can affect below

Kek

This post has been edited by nasilemaksedap: Nov 20 2019, 10:38 PM

Oh.. probably i din brother to make dupe like sohem like u. The shit u shared is also "they said"

Cant melt steel = yup, but 1600C is enough to soften steel (usually carbon steel; forged heat treated) to collapse. Metallurgist forgot to mention that?

Molten steel found = when trying to cut down steel structures aftermath?

They said? have u even see the evident lol

So how fire above can melt below

Kek

So all the architect n eniginners with their stated qualification n experience are stupid?

And u smarter than them ALL Wowoowwow

Hahahahhahahahahha

This post has been edited by nasilemaksedap: Nov 20 2019, 10:42 PM

Do you have access to supercomputer to do simulation?

Theorists claim the worst terror attack in American history was an inside job by the US government, saying it was impossible for the towers to collapse as if it were a controlled demolition without the use of explosives.

And as the world marks 17 years since two planes flew into the World Trade Center, scientists have disproved this theory and performed computer simulations to show how this would happen.

Chemist Frank Greening decided to calculate whether the towers would collapse under their own weight, without the need for explosives.

He told Smithsonian Mag: “The first thing I felt needed to be cleared up was; could the building collapse the way we saw it or did it actually need help from explosives as some people suggested?

“I set up a computer program based on momentum transfer to look at each impact of the floors collapsing.”

The simulations calculated the weight of the two buildings above the impact floors.

Prof Greening discovered that if one floor failed, the weight of the higher floors would cause each storey below it to give way.

As impacts were on different floors, simulation would need to account for the differing mass above each.

There were 15 floors above the impact point in the North Tower, and 22 in the South Tower.

Prof Greening’s simulations showed that the North Tower would fall in 13 seconds once it started collapsing, while the South Tower would collapse in 11 seconds.

These were in fact the exact times the buildings did take to fall.

Prof Greening continued: “I ran the program and it showed that the buildings would come down, but even more interesting was that the computer program predicted the exact collapse times.

“Once the building started to collapse, there was no stopping it. The mass of the upper block in the north tower was equivalent to the mass of the Titanic – about 38,000 tonnes.”

No man made object nor building is indestructible.
Remember mankind is also just mortal.

Wow tldr

Also computer simulation

Kek

Anyway show me a building with isolated fire at the top collapse leading to as entire symetrical total structure failure?

non

except for demolition

Kek

This post has been edited by nasilemaksedap: Nov 20 2019, 11:04 PM

CIA sure always track him... ‏@CIA_TXT

…USAMA BIN LADIN ASSOCIATE YAZID SUFAAT; date: March 6, 2003, at 12:50:27 PM;… (p 109)


…subject: FOR COORD by noon please: Yazid Sufaat PDB; date: March 14, 2003, at 09:05 AM; email from:… (p 109)


…plotting and the role of Yazid Sufaat“ (which is addressed in the full Committee Study and in this… (p 338)


…Insights into Yazid Sufaat’s Credibility (DTS #2005—3264).) Al-Filistini was later… (p 109)

7-11 inside job

sembang apa ni gais

Menteri: Pengawasan elektronik sah di sisi undang-undang
13 Jan 2020
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4890933
...Liew berkata Parlimen telah meluluskan beberapa peruntukan undang-undang bagi membenarkan pengawasan elektronik dengan Seksyen 116C Kanun Tatacara Jenayah sebagai peruntukan am.
...“Pengawasan elektronik merupakan satu langkah yang dipraktikkan oleh hampir setiap negara bagi memastikan keselamatan rakyat mereka,” katanya.