Toyota Harrier 2.0 NA recond, Any experience or issue with it
|
|
 Oct 1 2019, 10:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
The harrier 2.0T is very nice, but for the same amount of money I won't buy the recon harrier non turbo over the CX-5. The CX-5 engine and transmission is more advanced than N/A harrier.
Looks are subjective. I love the CX-5 |
|
|
Oct 2 2019, 01:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(jagjag @ Oct 2 2019, 09:44 AM) Kind of agree with you but what i love about the harrier is the interior especially the back seat...comfortable and lots of legroom. Question is are you driving or are you seated behind? CX-5 isn't uncomfortable in the rear. Just less space when compared to the Harrier. Then you have to ask yourself how often % you have passengers? And is it really *bad* or just *not as good*? If we pit against 2.0NA and cx-5, both have their pro and con...that's why i'm pondering on this option.. i bet the safer way sud just go for the brand new cx 5 right ??  Brand new car is better because you have the warranty. Plus it's new. For the same price, both 2.0L, both same segment, 1 new and 1 recon and a few years old, I'd pick the new car. |
|
|
Oct 3 2019, 12:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(adamhzm90 @ Oct 2 2019, 11:37 PM) Regularly ride in my ex boss recond harrier. It's a Toyota bruh. But recon don't have new car smell... lol. And no warranty. Wear and tear items like absorbers, bushings, you're on your own.Very nice and comfy. Every weekend he travel kl - johor. Owned for 3 years, never heard he said had any breakdown |
| Change to: |  0.0137sec
 0.33
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 12:40 AM |
Quote