Anyone have experience with this model as i search i saw a lot 2014 - 2016 model and selling with reasonable price form 140k - 170k.
OK for that price i'm not sure it's really reasonable for you guys and whether it worth to get it.
My take is the car interior look good and comfortable and i believe the drive sud be very comfortable as all the toyota is.
Also the legroom at the back passenger seat is very good as well...

Don't buy, CVT gearbox of Harrier recond is very fragile, high number of recond Harrier has CVT konk issue.

About RM7-10k to get it repaired, if that is acceptable to you within 3 years you buy the car, then it's ok.

Why not a brand new CX-5 with warranty and free service? The local spec Harrier 2.0T launched by UMW made the recond Harrier look like a con. It's not worth it in my opinion, lacking a lot of spec, turbo engine & no warranty.

However it's your hard earned money. If that's what makes you happy, just go ahead. Forummer usually will give all kind of opinion.

Wah is that bad ??? considering i know that toyota gearbox is reliable all the while...
Anyway thanks for the head-up.....
not acceptable lah if there's the risk ...

Ya ..actually i'm comparing this 2 car now.
I look at the harrier, seem nice and drive good as well..nvr drive it but from my x neighbour before this but since it's x i cant get respond from him again...

Harrier anytime over CX5

You may verify my statement with workshop and service Recon Harrier to find out more. My younger brother car hasn't been perfect despite he got a very new recon unit (body and undercarriage super clean and solid, verified by workshop upon purchase). Still problem hit him RM7k plus with CEL (check engine light) on dashboard now even after the repair.

What make u say this.....mind to share here

I would choose CX5..for me the design is better la

Harrier more gaya and premium vs CX-5.
CX-5 all over the road in Klang Valley.

But with that budget, better get brand new CX-5 for peace of mind.

The harrier 2.0T is very nice, but for the same amount of money I won't buy the recon harrier non turbo over the CX-5. The CX-5 engine and transmission is more advanced than N/A harrier.

Looks are subjective. I love the CX-5

Kind of agree with you but what i love about the harrier is the interior especially the back seat...comfortable and lots of legroom.
If we pit against 2.0NA and cx-5, both have their pro and con...that's why i'm pondering on this option..
i bet the safer way sud just go for the brand new cx 5 right ??

CX-5 2.5Turbo all the way. no regret!

The feeling of taking delivery of a new car with all the plastic wrapper still intact & new car smell. It's priceless!

Not to mention full 5 year warranty and service from Bermaz! This is a proper premium ownership experience.

This post has been edited by budang: Oct 2 2019, 10:01 AM

Yaya...the 5+5 is really great...
taking delivery of new car..it's been a while
Waiting for the time to check it out the new refresh CX 5

Question is are you driving or are you seated behind? CX-5 isn't uncomfortable in the rear. Just less space when compared to the Harrier. Then you have to ask yourself how often % you have passengers? And is it really *bad* or just *not as good*?

Brand new car is better because you have the warranty. Plus it's new. For the same price, both 2.0L, both same segment, 1 new and 1 recon and a few years old, I'd pick the new car.

Go for CX-5 2019. Better design

I'm driving it but ya ..i will always fetch my two 'King's around with the queen seated beside me...not to the extend of 'bad' i can say...ya not as good is the right words...
I always pay attention to the rear passenger seat when choosing my ride...
And the main reason i ignore the Subaru Forester is beside the outlook, the rear seat thigh support is very noticeable short although the legroom is great..
Ya...Brand new car wit warranty is a very great pushing point...

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.....
Both look great for me actually...

Agree. Still something within your budget