Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Recommended SATAIII SSD for general upgrade

views
     
TristanX
post Sep 15 2019, 10:41 AM

Where is my stars?
Group Icon
Elite
24,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BTS1501 @ Sep 15 2019, 08:38 AM)
UV500 is dram-less (same as A400), it is better than A400 as it is 3D TLC and better controller, while A400 is 2D TLC.

Don't anyhow believe the tables tabulated is 100% correct, people will always make mistakes here and there.
*
Marvell 88SS1074 controller is DRAM based. Just Kingston did not give information on how big is it.

https://www.marvell.com/storage/ssd/88ss1074/

Anyway, still the slowest of the bunch.
tien171
post Sep 15 2019, 11:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(BTS1501 @ Sep 15 2019, 09:38 AM)
UV500 is dram-less (same as A400), it is better than A400 as it is 3D TLC and better controller, while A400 is 2D TLC.

Don't anyhow believe the tables tabulated is 100% correct, people will always make mistakes here and there.
*
hhaha dont simply say uv500 is dramless .


you have seen a review that say so ? where .

This post has been edited by tien171: Sep 15 2019, 11:39 AM
tien171
post Sep 15 2019, 11:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
from a UV 500 review .


Kingston is utilizing Toshiba 15nm TLC NAND and each package is 32GB in capacity. Once formatted in Windows there is about 446GB usable capacity. The cache provided by a Nanya 512MB LPDDR3 1600 DRAM package and the controller is a Marvell 88SS1074.

This post has been edited by tien171: Sep 15 2019, 11:46 AM
BTS1501
post Sep 15 2019, 02:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(TristanX @ Sep 15 2019, 10:41 AM)
Marvell 88SS1074 controller is DRAM based. Just Kingston did not give information on how big is it.

https://www.marvell.com/storage/ssd/88ss1074/

Anyway, still the slowest of the bunch.
*
Yes, Marvell 88SS1074 controller is DRAM based, but kingston make it dram-less.

QUOTE(tien171 @ Sep 15 2019, 11:39 AM)
from a UV  500  review .
Kingston is utilizing Toshiba 15nm TLC NAND and each package is 32GB in capacity. Once formatted in Windows there is about 446GB usable capacity. The cache provided by a Nanya 512MB LPDDR3 1600 DRAM package and the controller is a Marvell 88SS1074.
*
Hello, read carefully the title of your source, UV 400, not UV500.

Just search for any reviews on UV500, and you see any one said with dram ? Not even kingston specification page.

If got dram, they will sure announce/write it big-big on their packaging, this is very simple logic. Instead, they only put 10x faster. Got money to earn more don't want ah ?




TristanX
post Sep 15 2019, 03:16 PM

Where is my stars?
Group Icon
Elite
24,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BTS1501 @ Sep 15 2019, 02:55 PM)
Yes, Marvell 88SS1074 controller is DRAM based, but kingston make it dram-less.
*
Do you have proof?
pretty23
post Sep 15 2019, 03:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,791 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Hahaha.

user posted image

user posted image

Have fun.

This post has been edited by pretty23: Sep 15 2019, 03:18 PM
TristanX
post Sep 15 2019, 03:23 PM

Where is my stars?
Group Icon
Elite
24,353 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(pretty23 @ Sep 15 2019, 03:17 PM)
Hahaha.

user posted image

user posted image

Have fun.
*
Looks like 128MB for 240GB.

http://www.cpuprocessorchip.com/sale-11102...face-mount.html
pretty23
post Sep 15 2019, 03:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,791 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(TristanX @ Sep 15 2019, 03:23 PM)
Correct.


BTS1501
post Sep 15 2019, 03:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(TristanX @ Sep 15 2019, 03:16 PM)
Do you have proof?
*
My bad. I was wrong.

QUOTE(pretty23 @ Sep 15 2019, 03:17 PM)
Hahaha.

Have fun.
*
Thanks for the picture/clarification. smile.gif
tien171
post Sep 15 2019, 04:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(BTS1501 @ Sep 15 2019, 04:56 PM)
My bad. I was wrong.
Thanks for the picture/clarification.  smile.gif
*
hahaa told you so
the memory chip Kingston D1216MCABXGGBS .


A total of four NAND flash chips are found on the Kingston UV500 240GB solid state disk, with two of them on each side. The chips used are Kingston branded flash memory labeled FH64B08UCT1-31 with a capacity of 64GB per integrated circuit chip. These are triple-level cells manufactured on 15nm fabrication process. Its rated write endurance is 100TB, which equates to about 55GB per day for five years. This is pretty good, considering it is more than some high end drives out there. 16GB out of the 256GB total capacity (Just under 7%) is provisioned for the drive controller for overhead, so the actual usable space is 240GB, as advertised. You will see 223GB in Windows. One Kingston D1216MCABXGGBS memory chip is present; used with the Marvell 88SS1074 controller to ensure smooth operation.


http://aphnetworks.com/reviews/kingston-uv500-240gb-sata/2

This post has been edited by tien171: Sep 15 2019, 04:20 PM
Champinidan
post Sep 15 2019, 05:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
I can suggest you for example something from Samsung (me personally will go with noname brand Radeon SSD) but let me tell you if you do buy them new it's really something like with SSD's - they all have SATA III interface and even much faster.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0214sec    0.82    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 11:44 AM