QUOTE(mADmAN @ Jul 16 2007, 07:50 AM)
dammit...all this talk of quad 1066 vs dual 1333 is getting me confused...
i remember a thread a short while ago on the same matter.. Q6600 vs E6850. and in that thread it was the more the merrier so most replies suggested the Q6600...
now sini pulak saying E6850.. baskets la u all.. making me even more confused now

so...which should i get then??
usage will be gaming (setting up an 8800GTS 320MB SLI rig on P5N32-E SLI).
LOTS of video encoding.
heat of course will be an issue as even a single 8800 is heating up like mad now. cooler will be cooled by a lapped XP-120. might OC.
want it to last for around 3 years before having the need for speed again.
so cmon guys.. make up my mind for me...i cant do it coz ive been working non stop since 3 PM yesterday (Sunday) til now 745am (Monday). so brain really not functioning

Not necessarily. The question you have to ask yourself is whether you're using any applications/software that take advantage of quad core CPU. If it doesn't, then no point going quad.
If I'm not mistaken, video encoding will benefit from quad core. I always skip this part of any review as I don't do video encoding! You should check reviews on quad core doing video encoding. If the results are spectacular, which I think it will be, then quad core is for you.
If only for gaming, then a faster dual core is better. So far, discussions have concluded that multithreaded games will come out but not so fast. In the future, when multithreaded games are common place, you can always upgrade to newer native quad core processors! For me, I'm looking forward to penryn!
QUOTE(Phoenixwunin @ Jul 16 2007, 12:36 PM)
err... getting a little headache after reading a few replies back then

So I assume for gaming E6750 will be enuff?? No need for Q6600 rite???
In terms of price, the E6750 is the sweet spot, I think.
However, I just booked a E6850 because I got a good price for it!

My initial plan was to get a E6750.....