You can read the star link above.

AG TT had recused himself, the new DPP takes full responsibility for his decision to drop it.

He came in with a fresh perspective and thought it's a guaranteed losing case, hence he dropped the case, TT had nothig to do with it. As the DPP said, he only informed TT on the morning itself he decided to drop it.

MACC can terkejut all they want, but it is the DPP handling the case that has the prerogative to press on or drop it, and he made it clear it was his decision, not anyone else.

In fact, he requested for discharge not amounting to acquittal, but the court had granted full acquittal. So TT had the power to influence the court?

Who got some Indian to be the patsy as CEO of a fake company.

KUALA LUMPUR: : Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) menafikan dakwaan untuk menarik balik dua pertuduhan kes rasuah terhadap Menteri Kewangan Lim Guan Eng seperti yang dilaporkan oleh sebuah portal berita.

“SPRM tidak mempunyai kuasa untuk melaksanakan perkara seumpama itu bagi mana-mana kes pendakwaan sebaliknya ia tertakluk kepada kuasa Pejabat Peguam Negara,” jelas kenyataan yang dikeluarkan pada Rabu.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.astroawani.c...-181364%3famp=1

Yes AG got the power...

It mentions Pejabat Peguam Negara which means it's the AG Chambers (not necessarily the AG himself as it could be the DPP in charge who decided to drop the charge).

AG is the head of AG Chambers and DPP work under AG in AGC. AG and DPP have absolute discretion (power) to decide whether to charge or not to charge a person or withdraw the charge halfway through the proceeding.

But of course if there is any conflict between the decision of AG and DPP, the AG's decision should prevail as he is the head/boss of DPP. That is to say, if the DPP decided to withdraw the charge but AG decided against the withdrawal, the DPP then ought to follow AG's decision.

In LGE case, the AG claimed that he was not involved in the decision making for the withdrawal of the charge which means that he did not decide for or against the withdrawal of the charge, he just stayed away from it and let the DPP himself make the decision.

Although logically as the AG himself, he should have reviewed the case thoroughly to make sure the DPP's decision to withdraw the charge is right and proper instead of staying away from it and solely letting the DPP himself to make the decision as he did in order to avoid any political accusation or remarks against him.

This post has been edited by Riggo: Aug 28 2019, 09:00 PM

Thats how money laundering works... You pusing satu dunia to make it hard to trace.

I hope SriRam gave the best to nab bijan... Sri Ram is the best we got.

But kindda Sad as nothing we don't know in what SriRam said. And some or all has been answered by BN macais... But now is the real showdown.... The best we got from Malaysian Baru vs Hot Shot lawyer... Fight..

Magahai dis bijan. I hope he got loceng cancer and his dick drop off

i take a look already headache liao, how come u can get mental orgasms .... lawyers all like super long documents ke?

Thanks for the clarification..you got the point

The last two paragrsph explain eveything. It can be the AG or DPP itself for which we will never know.

My humbe opinion, trial should be carried out as it is. Let the justice speak to itself...

No, lawyers like complicated stuff distilled down into easy, simple to read and understand points presented in an articulate, eloquent and erudite fashion.

Sri Ram made a complex, multi-layered, tedious and winding case sound simple and easy to follow. Takes VERY big brains to pull off such a packaging.

ok

lemme read again .... when free

due to the power of cash.. u think he no money they will worship him? His troopers are still here as you can see...busloads of them

Brevity and conciseness.

but hor your kepit boss najib and hot shot lawyer safee want to ban sri ram ler so scare meh

dog bit ma hand

tired

another court case

medical cert


sky is the limit. what will shafee think of next?

Don't pancut awal laa..... Really.. All is old news and allegation.. I do hope for some new allegation... All has been answered. Well... We see lah... Jeng... Jeng... Jeng....

mc card activated !!!
even though mc not valid in court still mc janji delay

Most likely previous AG were forced to make a case even though fully knowing it's a losing battle, because such case will smear LGE name just in time for GE14