it is small compared to the HR-01....i have removed some fins in order to put in my system...dah cacatlo...
DTH heatsink discussion!, vs tower and ultra 120
DTH heatsink discussion!, vs tower and ultra 120
|
|
Jul 4 2007, 08:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i love it...going to replace my thermalright HR-1......
it is small compared to the HR-01....i have removed some fins in order to put in my system...dah cacatlo... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 5 2007, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
good heatsink...going to get it from TS today!!!!
|
|
|
Jul 5 2007, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
u are sooooo right!!!! well,i get the xigmatek HDT-S963 from ckhoong today!!! man...this is really small heatsink as compared to my current Thermalright HR01(mine saw off 1/4 in height)!! will test it once i get back as compared to my currently setting!! QUOTE(E-J@1 @ Jul 5 2007, 12:30 PM) not like that la who is stupid enough to buy a heatsink that is bigger, heavier, got extra 3 or 10 or 100 heatpipe just like buying those TT BigWater watercooler --> why pay more when High-end Air Cooling can do the job? why go such hassle installing it when High-end Air Cooling is damn easy in installing it even Xigmatek is the same price with Ultra-120 Extreme, I still go for xigmatek reason --> smaller in size, easy installation of other hardware such as 4-Pin Power Cable, i'm willingly to sacrifice my hardware 1 degree hotter just for the easy installation --> utterly stupid for me to go for the 1 degree difference when my hardware can sustain till 80 degrees (still lots more temp left) |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
damn,
i found out that the Xigmatek perform much much betther if i open my side casing!!!! Idle at 3040Ghz(E6400) at 36 to 39C Orthos Load show at 50 to 55C......quite good as compared to my "modification HR-01" which show 60 to 65C.. all using thermal paste AS5. |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ya...my air ventilation is not good...
open side casing immediately show idle temperature to 36C to 41C which is much much better than my HR-01. who is selling this so call Evercool PC Air Conditioner the link ; http://www.cyberguys.com/templates/searchd...?productID=6423 i have fix back my 80mm Fan on my side casing...it did bring down the temperature. Man...this heatsink is cool... [[[[[[[[[[[Neon Crab Cooler with "Shawty Bling Bling"]]]]]]]]]] ((((((My Modified HR-01 with Ori Intel Fan Glue)))))) *********Tunnel Cooling System******* Modified HR-01 At Load state....................................................................At Idle State My Humble PC; Xigamatek S963 result My conclusion; For my casing,i need a small medium size heatsink where Xigmatek S963 fit nicely in my casing. Maybe it is not fair to compared my "decaptivated" HR-01 heatsink All i can say...Xigmatek performed good for my O/C E6400 at 3Ghz.. The Xigmatek fan is damn noisy....so i use back the intel fan!!!! This post has been edited by MakNok: Jul 9 2007, 10:36 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 10:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Cannot close my side panel lo...
so i dismantle the fin one by one until the height just ngam ngam my slim casing.. well..it still better than the stock heatsink.. i just like the quite fan noise of the intel. QUOTE(sHawTY @ Jul 9 2007, 10:07 PM) Added on July 9, 2007, 10:24 pmNow awaiting my CoolIt Eliminator as shown in the link below; http://www.coolitsystems.com/index.php?opt...ask=view&id=132 This post has been edited by MakNok: Jul 9 2007, 10:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Maybe my defective HR-01 isn't performing as expected but i remember clearly that the result doesn't differ much even if the original height for this HR-01 is still intact..
just taken a risk to dismantle some of the aluminium fins and i bend the the end rod as u can see. Using longnose plier,,,i twist and turn and using cutter as well. and u can see my masterpiece!! QUOTE(Polar_012 @ Jul 9 2007, 10:25 PM) |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Jul 9 2007, 10:55 PM) @MakNok, thx for the feedback! I can't wait to get my hands on the xigmatek S1293!!! yalor ...not much difference and i have just broken one of the heatpipe to show that Polar_012 theory is wrong...!!Wahlioa! So brave aaa..... If you happen to rupture the heatpipes, then the heatsink would be so defective!!! I think if he just remove a few of the top fins, it won't make much of a difference. The reason is that the top fins are usually cool! Even on my noctua, at core temp of 60'c, the top fins are still cool..... see the broken heatpipe....there goes my HR-01!! now my heatsink really defective!!!! Added on July 9, 2007, 11:15 pm QUOTE(AceCombat @ Jul 9 2007, 04:47 PM) definitely...see my latest posting!!This post has been edited by MakNok: Jul 9 2007, 11:15 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Polar_012 @ Jul 9 2007, 11:17 PM) The inner part of that heatpipe you broke is porous for the sole purpose of capilary function so that the fluid would flow back to it's original state despite gravity. like that ar..then i will saw off the bottom heat pipe tomolo at my working place interested to know further if your theory is right!! learning new thing everyday!!! This post has been edited by MakNok: Jul 9 2007, 11:31 PM |
|
|
Jul 10 2007, 08:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,713 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0159sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 12:10 PM |