doubt it will be that good because the surface will not be that flat no matter how well it is lapped.
DTH heatsink discussion!, vs tower and ultra 120
DTH heatsink discussion!, vs tower and ultra 120
|
|
May 29 2007, 08:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
doubt it will be that good because the surface will not be that flat no matter how well it is lapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 29 2007, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 30 2007, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(lohwenli @ May 29 2007, 10:24 PM) Are you kidding me? Copper's heat conductivity is at least 30% more than aluminium. there is a diff between conductivity and atrractivity.But really, if anyone wants to be extreme, use a silver plate. Silver is the best heat and electrical conductor for any single metal at room temperature. At least 10% better than copper. think bout it. if copper is better, then why are the fins aluminium? this is because of its ability to extract heat ahd disperse it quickly just to add onto the topic. QUOTE You can see where the pipes gap between the Aluminum of the base and the next pipe, but the contact between the base of each heatpipe was excellent. These little gaps got filled with TIM, and could possibly cause a slight performance loss. This post has been edited by DaRkSyThE: May 30 2007, 10:41 AM |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
ok lets get back to the discussion of this heatsink. not much point going around the same thing over and ovef again
|
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
ok, i have merged the thread so that u guys can discuss here
|
| Change to: | 0.0248sec
0.13
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:08 AM |